On 02/12/13 19:47, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
Add class record_builder to ease construction of records and unions. Use it
in some appropriate places.
Nathan please review the vxworks changes.
config/vxworks.c
Replace vxworks_emutls_var_fields() with vxworks_emutls_object_type().
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Lawrence Crowl cr...@google.com wrote:
On 2/14/13, Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Lawrence Crowl cr...@google.com wrote:
Add class record_builder to ease construction of records and unions. Use
it
in some
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Note that there is no such thing as a middle-end or back-end type.
but we do conceptually have them.
-- Gaby
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Lawrence Crowl cr...@google.com wrote:
Add class record_builder to ease construction of records and unions. Use it
in some appropriate places.
Nathan please review the vxworks changes.
tree.h
New class record_builder.
tree.c
Implement
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 4:26 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Note that tag_name does not allow the way C++ uses this (it can be
a TYPE_DECL).
Overall I'm not sure this is a good abstraction unless you manage to
make the frontends use it.
I think that is a mistake. This
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 4:26 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Note that tag_name does not allow the way C++ uses this (it can be
a TYPE_DECL).
Overall I'm not sure this is a good abstraction
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Because it's otherwise almost unused. No usual gimple pass builds
up record types. What's the point in introducing the abstraction if
most of the users cannot use it?
There may be few users on the gimple side,
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Because it's otherwise almost unused. No usual gimple pass builds
up record types. What's the point in introducing the abstraction if
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Because it's otherwise almost unused. No usual gimple
On 2/14/13, Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Lawrence Crowl cr...@google.com wrote:
Add class record_builder to ease construction of records and unions. Use
it
in some appropriate places.
tree
-default_emutls_var_fields (tree type,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Lawrence Crowl cr...@google.com wrote:
@@ -182,24 +163,9 @@ default_emutls_var_init (tree to, tree d
static tree
get_emutls_object_type (void)
{
- tree type, type_name, field;
-
- type = emutls_object_type;
- if (type)
-return type;
-
-
On 2/13/13, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Lawrence Crowl cr...@google.com wrote:
@@ -182,24 +163,9 @@ default_emutls_var_init (tree to, tree d
static tree
get_emutls_object_type (void)
{
- tree type, type_name, field;
-
- type =
Thanks. The patch is OK for the branch. You can address Nathan's
review after he's back and gets a chance to look at it.
Let me know when the patch is in. I've got another merge in process.
Diego.
On 2/13/13, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
Thanks. The patch is OK for the branch. You can address Nathan's
review after he's back and gets a chance to look at it.
Let me know when the patch is in. I've got another merge in process.
Committed.
--
Lawrence Crowl
Add class record_builder to ease construction of records and unions. Use it
in some appropriate places.
Nathan please review the vxworks changes.
tree.h
New class record_builder.
tree.c
Implement record_builder member functions.
asan.c
Change asan_global_struct to use
15 matches
Mail list logo
