* Thomas Quinot, 2016-09-18 :
> Sorry for the delay in reviewing your patch. It looks good on the
> surface; we're QAing it internally to make sure it does not break
> PolyORB (which is the primary consumer of g-pehage). I'll let you know
> as soon as I have the results from that run.
QA went
> This patch fixes GNAT.Perfect_Hash_Generators for strings which are
> not 1-based. It does this by introducing its own storage type which
> fixes the first index as 1. This is also a minor optimization because
> it avoids the need to store the index.
>
> Okay for trunk?
>
> Should I try to
