> I’ve extended the logical warning to the NAMED, OPENED, and PENDING
> specifiers. I’ve also audited the integer specifiers, and extended the
> warning to NUMBER, NEXTREC, and RECL, which were missing.
>
> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-apple-darwin13, OK to commit?
Committed as rev. 211
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 09:38:06PM +0200, FX wrote:
> > It seems that some of these extensions are not caught by -std=f95
>
> I?ve now audited the I/O specifiers for such warnings too. A warning existed
> only for EXIST, which was introduced way back by Steve:
>
> > 2010-07-05 Steven G. Kargl
> It seems that some of these extensions are not caught by -std=f95
I’ve now audited the I/O specifiers for such warnings too. A warning existed
only for EXIST, which was introduced way back by Steve:
> 2010-07-05 Steven G. Kargl
>
> PR fortran/44797
> * fortran/io.c (resolve
