On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:45 AM, Dominik Vogt v...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
The only points in that patch are that on one hand - as far as I
know - the Abi does not guarantee that section symbols are either
zero or not relocated, even if that may be the case in reality.
And on the other hand,
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 07:29:33AM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Dominik Vogt v...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On s390[x] the symbol value of a section symbol is definitely not
zero.
Is true even in an object file?
No.
I agree that in an executable a
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 06:25:55PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Dominik Vogt v...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
* libgo/go/debug/elf/file.go (applyRelocationsAMD64):
Fix the calculation of some relocations; do not assume that the
symbol
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Dominik Vogt v...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On s390[x] the symbol value of a section symbol is definitely not
zero.
Is true even in an object file? I agree that in an executable a
section symbol will have a non-zero value, but that case doesn't arise
since an
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Dominik Vogt v...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
This optional cleanup patch fixes some sloppy programming in the
x86 libgo/go/debug/elf library that had given me a very hard time
to debug and fix when porting the code to s390[x]. See commit
comment for details.
