On Thu, 25 Sep 2014, David Malcolm wrote:
Should this have the $(exeext) suffix seen in Makefile.in?
$(target_noncanonical)-gcc-$(version)$(exeext)
Depends on whether that's needed for the pex code to find it.
As for (B), would it make sense to bake in the path to the binary into
the pex
On Tue, 2014-09-23 at 23:27 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
[...]
The code for compiling a .s file should:
[...]
* use the $(target_noncanonical)-gcc-$(version) name for the driver rather
than plain gcc, to maximise the chance that it is actually the same
compiler the JIT library was built for
