Re: [match-and-simplify] reject expanding operator-list to implicit 'for'

2015-05-23 Thread Prathamesh Kulkarni
On 20 May 2015 at 17:39, Prathamesh Kulkarni prathamesh.kulka...@linaro.org wrote: On 20 May 2015 at 17:01, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote: On Wed, 20 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: On 20 May 2015 at 16:17, Prathamesh Kulkarni prathamesh.kulka...@linaro.org wrote: Hi, This

Re: [match-and-simplify] reject expanding operator-list to implicit 'for'

2015-05-21 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, 20 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: On 20 May 2015 at 18:18, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote: On Wed, 20 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: On 20 May 2015 at 17:01, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote: On Wed, 20 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: On 20

Re: [match-and-simplify] reject expanding operator-list to implicit 'for'

2015-05-20 Thread Prathamesh Kulkarni
On 20 May 2015 at 16:17, Prathamesh Kulkarni prathamesh.kulka...@linaro.org wrote: Hi, This patch rejects expanding operator-list to implicit 'for'. On second thoughts, should we reject expansion of operator-list _only_ if it's mixed with 'for' ? We could define multiple operator-lists in

[match-and-simplify] reject expanding operator-list to implicit 'for'

2015-05-20 Thread Prathamesh Kulkarni
Hi, This patch rejects expanding operator-list to implicit 'for'. OK for trunk after bootstrap+testing ? Thanks, Prathamesh 2015-05-20 Prathamesh Kulkarni prathamesh.kulka...@linaro.org * genmatch.c (parser::record_operlist): Remove. (parser::oper_lists_set): Likewise.

Re: [match-and-simplify] reject expanding operator-list to implicit 'for'

2015-05-20 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, 20 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: Hi, This patch rejects expanding operator-list to implicit 'for'. OK for trunk after bootstrap+testing ? Ok. Thanks, Richard.

Re: [match-and-simplify] reject expanding operator-list to implicit 'for'

2015-05-20 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, 20 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: On 20 May 2015 at 16:17, Prathamesh Kulkarni prathamesh.kulka...@linaro.org wrote: Hi, This patch rejects expanding operator-list to implicit 'for'. On second thoughts, should we reject expansion of operator-list _only_ if it's mixed with

Re: [match-and-simplify] reject expanding operator-list to implicit 'for'

2015-05-20 Thread Prathamesh Kulkarni
On 20 May 2015 at 17:01, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote: On Wed, 20 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: On 20 May 2015 at 16:17, Prathamesh Kulkarni prathamesh.kulka...@linaro.org wrote: Hi, This patch rejects expanding operator-list to implicit 'for'. On second thoughts, should

Re: [match-and-simplify] reject expanding operator-list to implicit 'for'

2015-05-20 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, 20 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: On 20 May 2015 at 17:01, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote: On Wed, 20 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: On 20 May 2015 at 16:17, Prathamesh Kulkarni prathamesh.kulka...@linaro.org wrote: Hi, This patch rejects expanding

Re: [match-and-simplify] reject expanding operator-list to implicit 'for'

2015-05-20 Thread Prathamesh Kulkarni
On 20 May 2015 at 18:18, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote: On Wed, 20 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: On 20 May 2015 at 17:01, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote: On Wed, 20 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: On 20 May 2015 at 16:17, Prathamesh Kulkarni