On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 11:33 +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
On 2011/3/30 05:28 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 15:35 +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
On 2011/3/30 上午 12:23, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 22:53 +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
On 2011/3/29 下午
On 2011/3/31 06:14 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 11:33 +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
On 2011/3/30 05:28 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 15:35 +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
On 2011/3/30 上午 12:23, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 22:53 +0800,
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 22:18 +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
On 2011/3/31 06:14 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 11:33 +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
On 2011/3/30 05:28 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 15:35 +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
On 2011/3/30 上午
On 2011/4/1 01:33 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 22:18 +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
On 2011/3/31 06:14 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 11:33 +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
On 2011/3/30 05:28 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 15:35 +0800,
On 2011/3/30 上午 12:23, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 22:53 +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
On 2011/3/29 下午 10:26, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 18:25 +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
On 2011/3/24 06:51 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 12:56 +0900,
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 15:35 +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
On 2011/3/30 上午 12:23, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 22:53 +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
On 2011/3/29 下午 10:26, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 18:25 +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
On 2011/3/24 06:51
On 2011/3/30 05:28 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 15:35 +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
On 2011/3/30 上午 12:23, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 22:53 +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
On 2011/3/29 下午 10:26, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 18:25 +0800,
On 2011/3/24 06:51 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 12:56 +0900, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
Hi,
PR48250 happens under TARGET_NEON, where DImode is included within the
valid NEON modes. This turns the range of legitimate constant indexes to
step-4 (coproc load/store), thus
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 18:25 +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
On 2011/3/24 06:51 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 12:56 +0900, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
Hi,
PR48250 happens under TARGET_NEON, where DImode is included within the
valid NEON modes. This turns the range of
On 2011/3/29 下午 10:26, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 18:25 +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
On 2011/3/24 06:51 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 12:56 +0900, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
Hi,
PR48250 happens under TARGET_NEON, where DImode is included within the
valid
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 12:56 +0900, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
Hi,
PR48250 happens under TARGET_NEON, where DImode is included within the
valid NEON modes. This turns the range of legitimate constant indexes to
step-4 (coproc load/store), thus arm_legitimize_reload_address() when
trying to
11 matches
Mail list logo
