Re: [patch, testsuite, ARM] don't try to execute simd.exp tests on targets without NEON

2016-03-06 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: > On 21/05/15 10:01, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: >> Hi Sandra, >> >> On 21/05/15 06:43, Sandra Loosemore wrote: >>> This is another patch aimed at fixing bugs relating to trying to execute >>> NEON code on a

Re: [patch, testsuite, ARM] don't try to execute simd.exp tests on targets without NEON

2016-03-02 Thread Andre Vieira (lists)
On 21/05/15 10:01, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: > Hi Sandra, > > On 21/05/15 06:43, Sandra Loosemore wrote: >> This is another patch aimed at fixing bugs relating to trying to execute >> NEON code on a target that doesn't support it revealed by my >> arm-none-eabi testing on a gazillion different

Re: [patch, testsuite, ARM] don't try to execute simd.exp tests on targets without NEON

2015-05-21 Thread Kyrill Tkachov
Hi Sandra, On 21/05/15 06:43, Sandra Loosemore wrote: This is another patch aimed at fixing bugs relating to trying to execute NEON code on a target that doesn't support it revealed by my arm-none-eabi testing on a gazillion different multilibs. Inspired by what vect.exp does and my other

[patch, testsuite, ARM] don't try to execute simd.exp tests on targets without NEON

2015-05-20 Thread Sandra Loosemore
This is another patch aimed at fixing bugs relating to trying to execute NEON code on a target that doesn't support it revealed by my arm-none-eabi testing on a gazillion different multilibs. Inspired by what vect.exp does and my other patch in this group to fix advsimd-intrinsics.exp, I've