Re: [testsuite, i386] Fix for PR50185

2011-08-30 Thread Kirill Yukhin
Hi, This is a ping. Is the patch ok for trunk? Thanks, K On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 5:52 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, Thanks for your objections. HJ, I scanned all AVX2 tests. So, every tests

Re: [testsuite, i386] Fix for PR50185

2011-08-30 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, This is a ping. Is the patch ok for trunk? OK. Thanks, Uros.

Re: [testsuite, i386] Fix for PR50185

2011-08-30 Thread Kirill Yukhin
Thank you! Guys who is able to write, could you please check-in my changes? K On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, This is a ping. Is the patch ok for trunk? OK.

[testsuite, i386] Fix for PR50185

2011-08-26 Thread Kirill Yukhin
Hi, Here is a fix for http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50182 testsuite/ChangeLog entry: 2011-08-26 Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@intel.com PR testsuite/50185 * gcc.target/i386/avx2-vmovmskb-2.c: Rename to ... * gcc.target/i386/avx2-vpmovmskb-2.c: ... this.

Re: [testsuite, i386] Fix for PR50185

2011-08-26 Thread Kirill Yukhin
According to Jakub's input, I've updated test to scan instruction, not pattern name. Is it ok? Thanks, K On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Here is a fix for http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50182 testsuite/ChangeLog entry:

Re: [testsuite, i386] Fix for PR50185

2011-08-26 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com wrote: According to Jakub's input, I've updated test to scan instruction, not pattern name. Is it ok? Thanks, K On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Here is a fix for

Re: [testsuite, i386] Fix for PR50185

2011-08-26 Thread H.J. Lu
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 5:04 AM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com wrote: According to Jakub's input, I've updated test to scan instruction, not pattern name. Is it ok? Thanks, K On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Here is a fix for

Re: [testsuite, i386] Fix for PR50185

2011-08-26 Thread Kirill Yukhin
Hi guys, Thanks for your objections. HJ, I scanned all AVX2 tests. So, every tests has at least tab which distinguishes it from filename: $ pwd /export/users/kyukhin/ws/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386 $ grep scan-assembler avx2-* |grep -v \t |wc -l 0 Uros, you're right. Patch contains usless

Re: [testsuite, i386] Fix for PR50185

2011-08-26 Thread H.J. Lu
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, Thanks for your objections. HJ, I scanned all AVX2 tests. So, every tests has at least tab which distinguishes it from filename: $ pwd /export/users/kyukhin/ws/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386 $ grep

Re: [testsuite, i386] Fix for PR50185

2011-08-26 Thread Jakub Jelinek
Hi! On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 06:04:20AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote: Please check ALL AVX2 tests to see if they have similar problems. Checking all current i386 tests revealed another problematic testcase: grep scan-assembler' [a-z0-9]*' testsuite/gcc.target/i386/*.c | grep '\(.*\).*\1' (minmax-*.c