Hi,
This is a ping.
Is the patch ok for trunk?
Thanks, K
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 5:52 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi guys,
Thanks for your objections.
HJ, I scanned all AVX2 tests. So, every tests
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This is a ping.
Is the patch ok for trunk?
OK.
Thanks,
Uros.
Thank you!
Guys who is able to write, could you please check-in my changes?
K
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
This is a ping.
Is the patch ok for trunk?
OK.
Hi,
Here is a fix for http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50182
testsuite/ChangeLog entry:
2011-08-26 Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@intel.com
PR testsuite/50185
* gcc.target/i386/avx2-vmovmskb-2.c: Rename to ...
* gcc.target/i386/avx2-vpmovmskb-2.c: ... this.
According to Jakub's input, I've updated test to scan instruction, not
pattern name.
Is it ok?
Thanks, K
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Here is a fix for http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50182
testsuite/ChangeLog entry:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com wrote:
According to Jakub's input, I've updated test to scan instruction, not
pattern name.
Is it ok?
Thanks, K
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Here is a fix for
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 5:04 AM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com wrote:
According to Jakub's input, I've updated test to scan instruction, not
pattern name.
Is it ok?
Thanks, K
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Here is a fix for
Hi guys,
Thanks for your objections.
HJ, I scanned all AVX2 tests. So, every tests has at least tab which
distinguishes it from filename:
$ pwd
/export/users/kyukhin/ws/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386
$ grep scan-assembler avx2-* |grep -v \t |wc -l
0
Uros, you're right. Patch contains usless
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
Thanks for your objections.
HJ, I scanned all AVX2 tests. So, every tests has at least tab which
distinguishes it from filename:
$ pwd
/export/users/kyukhin/ws/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386
$ grep
Hi!
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 06:04:20AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
Please check ALL AVX2 tests to see if they have similar problems.
Checking all current i386 tests revealed another problematic testcase:
grep scan-assembler' [a-z0-9]*' testsuite/gcc.target/i386/*.c | grep
'\(.*\).*\1'
(minmax-*.c
10 matches
Mail list logo