On 05/27/14 02:04, Rainer Orth wrote:
It's been a week since I've submitted the patch, so far having received
approval for the testsuite parts only.
While I don't need approval for the Solaris-only parts, it would be good
if the doc and build changes could be checked by the respective
Jeff Law l...@redhat.com writes:
On 05/27/14 02:04, Rainer Orth wrote:
It's been a week since I've submitted the patch, so far having received
approval for the testsuite parts only.
While I don't need approval for the Solaris-only parts, it would be good
if the doc and build changes could
Hi Gerald,
On Tue, 27 May 2014, Mike Stump wrote:
So, I read the doc bits, and they look fine. I’m not a doc reviewer,
but, the changes are usual and customary for a port, and trivial.
Yes, and I'd like to emphasize this point: Just because a file
matches *.texi doesn't mean that ports,
Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net writes:
On May 27, 2014, at 1:04 AM, Rainer Orth r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de
wrote:
It's been a week since I've submitted the patch, so far having received
approval for the testsuite parts only.
So, I read the doc bits, and they look fine. I’m not a doc
On Tue, 27 May 2014, Mike Stump wrote:
So, I read the doc bits, and they look fine. I’m not a doc reviewer,
but, the changes are usual and customary for a port, and trivial.
Yes, and I'd like to emphasize this point: Just because a file
matches *.texi doesn't mean that ports, middle, front,
Rainer Orth r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de writes:
Rainer Orth r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de writes:
Prompted by the recent failures of c-c++-common/gomp/pr60823-2.c on
Solaris/x86 with Sun as
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00943.html
I've reworked the clearing of
On May 27, 2014, at 1:04 AM, Rainer Orth r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
It's been a week since I've submitted the patch, so far having received
approval for the testsuite parts only.
So, I read the doc bits, and they look fine. I’m not a doc reviewer, but, the
changes are usual and
Rainer Orth r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de writes:
Prompted by the recent failures of c-c++-common/gomp/pr60823-2.c on
Solaris/x86 with Sun as
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00943.html
I've reworked the clearing of hardware capabilities via linker maps for
Sun ld, which
On May 20, 2014, at 6:03 AM, Rainer Orth r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
The following patch implements what I've outlined there
Ok for mainline and 4.9 branch if those pass?
For the test suite bits, Ok.
Prompted by the recent failures of c-c++-common/gomp/pr60823-2.c on
Solaris/x86 with Sun as
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00943.html
I've reworked the clearing of hardware capabilities via linker maps for
Sun ld, which is currently replicated in several places all over the
10 matches
Mail list logo
