Re: [v3 PATCH] PR libstdc++/70437

2016-04-05 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 05/04/16 14:07 +0300, Ville Voutilainen wrote: On 5 April 2016 at 13:53, Jonathan Wakely wrote: I wonder if we want an __is_samey trait that checks if two decayed types are the same. If such checks become more common, then yes. For now, perhaps not. We already do it

Re: [v3 PATCH] PR libstdc++/70437

2016-04-05 Thread Ville Voutilainen
On 5 April 2016 at 13:53, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > I wonder if we want an __is_samey trait that checks if two decayed > types are the same. If such checks become more common, then yes. For now, perhaps not. > More seriously, a comment might be useful to explain that although

Re: [v3 PATCH] PR libstdc++/70437

2016-04-05 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 04/04/16 21:45 +0300, Ville Voutilainen wrote: And yes, -ENOPATCH. On 4 April 2016 at 21:42, Ville Voutilainen wrote: Tested on Linux-PPC64. 2016-04-04 Ville Voutilainen PR libstdc++/70437 * include/bits/stl_pair.h

Re: [v3 PATCH] PR libstdc++/70437

2016-04-04 Thread Ville Voutilainen
And yes, -ENOPATCH. On 4 April 2016 at 21:42, Ville Voutilainen wrote: > Tested on Linux-PPC64. > > 2016-04-04 Ville Voutilainen > > PR libstdc++/70437 > * include/bits/stl_pair.h (_ConstructiblePair, >

[v3 PATCH] PR libstdc++/70437

2016-04-04 Thread Ville Voutilainen
Tested on Linux-PPC64. 2016-04-04 Ville Voutilainen PR libstdc++/70437 * include/bits/stl_pair.h (_ConstructiblePair, _ImplicitlyConvertiblePair, _MoveConstructiblePair, _ImplicitlyMoveConvertiblePair): Add shortcut conditions for same-type