Committed.
Thanks!
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 October 2013 15:52, Tim Shen wrote:
I feel little bit uncomfortable with new ISO C++ standard, C++11,
since C++14 is already there, so I removed it.
Good idea.
Please check the words,
On Tue, 1 Oct 2013, Tim Shen wrote:
Hi, libstdc++-v3 regex is ready for releasing.
Nice!
Is it Ok to apply? By the way, do we need a News entry for this
improvement?
Yes, and yes. :-)
Just one question improved experimental support sounds a bit
weak. I think I understand where it is
Hi,
On 10/02/2013 12:19 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Tue, 1 Oct 2013, Tim Shen wrote:
Hi, libstdc++-v3 regex is ready for releasing.
Nice!
Is it Ok to apply? By the way, do we need a News entry for this
improvement?
Yes, and yes. :-)
Just one question improved experimental support sounds
On 2 October 2013 11:41, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Minimally, I would talk about improved support: the evolution from
-std=c++0x to -std=c++11 meant that we aren't in experimental mode anymore.
From speaking to Jason he's pretty adamant it's still experimental for now :-)
My understanding was that
On 10/02/2013 12:45 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 2 October 2013 11:41, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Minimally, I would talk about improved support: the evolution from
-std=c++0x to -std=c++11 meant that we aren't in experimental mode anymore.
From speaking to Jason he's pretty adamant it's still
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 12:55:48PM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 10/02/2013 12:45 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 2 October 2013 11:41, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Minimally, I would talk about improved support: the evolution from
-std=c++0x to -std=c++11 meant that we aren't in experimental mode
On 10/02/2013 12:59 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
We have announced only core language feature completeness, the library
was known to be incomplete. And, I think for 4.9 the library C++11
support is still meant to be experimental because of the ABI issues,
where we know we'll need to change
I feel little bit uncomfortable with new ISO C++ standard, C++11,
since C++14 is already there, so I removed it.
Please check the words, since English is not my first language .
Thanks!
Index: htdocs/index.html
===
RCS file:
On 2 October 2013 15:52, Tim Shen wrote:
I feel little bit uncomfortable with new ISO C++ standard, C++11,
since C++14 is already there, so I removed it.
Good idea.
Please check the words, since English is not my first language .
The english is fine, please wait a few hours in case anyone
Hi, libstdc++-v3 regex is ready for releasing.
Is it Ok to apply? By the way, do we need a News entry for this improvement?
Thanks!
Index: htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html,v
10 matches
Mail list logo