Re: [wwwdocs] Mention libstdc++-v3 regex in 4.9 changes.html

2013-10-03 Thread Tim Shen
Committed. Thanks! On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com wrote: On 2 October 2013 15:52, Tim Shen wrote: I feel little bit uncomfortable with new ISO C++ standard, C++11, since C++14 is already there, so I removed it. Good idea. Please check the words,

Re: [wwwdocs] Mention libstdc++-v3 regex in 4.9 changes.html

2013-10-02 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Tue, 1 Oct 2013, Tim Shen wrote: Hi, libstdc++-v3 regex is ready for releasing. Nice! Is it Ok to apply? By the way, do we need a News entry for this improvement? Yes, and yes. :-) Just one question improved experimental support sounds a bit weak. I think I understand where it is

Re: [wwwdocs] Mention libstdc++-v3 regex in 4.9 changes.html

2013-10-02 Thread Paolo Carlini
Hi, On 10/02/2013 12:19 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: On Tue, 1 Oct 2013, Tim Shen wrote: Hi, libstdc++-v3 regex is ready for releasing. Nice! Is it Ok to apply? By the way, do we need a News entry for this improvement? Yes, and yes. :-) Just one question improved experimental support sounds

Re: [wwwdocs] Mention libstdc++-v3 regex in 4.9 changes.html

2013-10-02 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 2 October 2013 11:41, Paolo Carlini wrote: Minimally, I would talk about improved support: the evolution from -std=c++0x to -std=c++11 meant that we aren't in experimental mode anymore. From speaking to Jason he's pretty adamant it's still experimental for now :-) My understanding was that

Re: [wwwdocs] Mention libstdc++-v3 regex in 4.9 changes.html

2013-10-02 Thread Paolo Carlini
On 10/02/2013 12:45 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 2 October 2013 11:41, Paolo Carlini wrote: Minimally, I would talk about improved support: the evolution from -std=c++0x to -std=c++11 meant that we aren't in experimental mode anymore. From speaking to Jason he's pretty adamant it's still

Re: [wwwdocs] Mention libstdc++-v3 regex in 4.9 changes.html

2013-10-02 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 12:55:48PM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote: On 10/02/2013 12:45 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 2 October 2013 11:41, Paolo Carlini wrote: Minimally, I would talk about improved support: the evolution from -std=c++0x to -std=c++11 meant that we aren't in experimental mode

Re: [wwwdocs] Mention libstdc++-v3 regex in 4.9 changes.html

2013-10-02 Thread Paolo Carlini
On 10/02/2013 12:59 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: We have announced only core language feature completeness, the library was known to be incomplete. And, I think for 4.9 the library C++11 support is still meant to be experimental because of the ABI issues, where we know we'll need to change

Re: [wwwdocs] Mention libstdc++-v3 regex in 4.9 changes.html

2013-10-02 Thread Tim Shen
I feel little bit uncomfortable with new ISO C++ standard, C++11, since C++14 is already there, so I removed it. Please check the words, since English is not my first language . Thanks! Index: htdocs/index.html === RCS file:

Re: [wwwdocs] Mention libstdc++-v3 regex in 4.9 changes.html

2013-10-02 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 2 October 2013 15:52, Tim Shen wrote: I feel little bit uncomfortable with new ISO C++ standard, C++11, since C++14 is already there, so I removed it. Good idea. Please check the words, since English is not my first language . The english is fine, please wait a few hours in case anyone

[wwwdocs] Mention libstdc++-v3 regex in 4.9 changes.html

2013-10-01 Thread Tim Shen
Hi, libstdc++-v3 regex is ready for releasing. Is it Ok to apply? By the way, do we need a News entry for this improvement? Thanks! Index: htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.9/changes.html,v