On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:02 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 04/04/2018 05:03 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>>
>> Hi Martin
>>
>> On 05/04/2018 00:28, Martin Sebor wrote:
>>>
>>> + implementations do suppresses the warning.
>>
>> suppress
>
>
> I was about to fix this but re-reading the full sentenc
On 04/04/2018 05:03 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi Martin
On 05/04/2018 00:28, Martin Sebor wrote:
+ implementations do suppresses the warning.
suppress
I was about to fix this but re-reading the full sentence made
me realize it's correct as is:
Note that due to GCC bug 82944, defining
OK.
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 3:13 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-04/msg00219.html
>
> There's one outstanding typo that Paolo noticed since I posted
> the update. I'll fix that before committing.
>
>
> On 04/04/2018 04:28 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
>>
>> Atta
Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-04/msg00219.html
There's one outstanding typo that Paolo noticed since I posted
the update. I'll fix that before committing.
On 04/04/2018 04:28 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Attached is an updated diff rebased on top of the latest revision
of the file.
Hi Martin
On 05/04/2018 00:28, Martin Sebor wrote:
+ implementations do suppresses the warning.
suppress
Paolo.
Attached is an updated diff rebased on top of the latest revision
of the file. This new version fixes the typos Paolo pointed out
(thanks) and adds a few more options:
-Wmissing-attributes, -Wif-not-aligned, and -Wpacked-not-aligned.
I used a spell-checker this time to (hopefully) minimize the
Hi again ;)
On 03/04/2018 22:54, Martin Sebor wrote:
+more consistently. Mutually excclusive attribute specifications are
exclusive
Paolo.
Hi,
On 03/04/2018 22:54, Martin Sebor wrote:
+mutually exclusive attribute specifications and hande such conflicts
handle
Thanks,
Paolo.
Oh my,
On 03/04/2018 22:54, Martin Sebor wrote:
+declaration or on distinct declarations of the same entitiy. For
entity
It's getting late here in Italy, I would recommend a systematic check of
the typos.
Paolo.
The attached changes add documentation of some of the options
I worked on for GCC 8.
The links to the GCC 8 manual don't work because there is no
gcc-8 documentation directory. I have checked them by hand
by substituting the GCC 7 directory. (I wonder: would it be
possible to populate the GCC 8
10 matches
Mail list logo