Re: Backport PR91838 and PR110838

2024-03-25 Thread Richard Biener 
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> After the backport off PR target/112787 a failure was reported against x86_64,
> this would be fixed by backporting:
> * tree-optimization/91838 - fix FAIL of g++.dg/opt/pr91838.C
> (d1c072a1c3411a6fe29900750b38210af8451eeb)
> * tree-optimization/110838 - less aggressively fold out-of-bound shifts
> (04aa0edcace22a7815cfc57575f1f7b1f166ac10)
> 
> Patches apply cleanly, just one minor git context conflict with includes.
> 
> Bootstrapped and regression tested on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu and
> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu for gcc-12 and gcc-13 branches.
> 
> OK to backport?

OK.

Thanks,
Richard.

Backport PR91838 and PR110838

2024-03-25 Thread Andre Vieira (lists) 

Hi,

After the backport off PR target/112787 a failure was reported against 
x86_64, this would be fixed by backporting:
* tree-optimization/91838 - fix FAIL of g++.dg/opt/pr91838.C 
(d1c072a1c3411a6fe29900750b38210af8451eeb)
* tree-optimization/110838 - less aggressively fold out-of-bound shifts 
(04aa0edcace22a7815cfc57575f1f7b1f166ac10)


Patches apply cleanly, just one minor git context conflict with includes.

Bootstrapped and regression tested on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu and 
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu for gcc-12 and gcc-13 branches.


OK to backport?

Kind regards,
Andre