On 10/11/19 4:23 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
has_value_dependent_address wasn't stripping location wrappers so it
gave the wrong answer for "&x" in the static_assert. That led us to
thinking that the expression isn't instantiation-dependent, and we
skipped static initialization of A<0>::x.
This pa
Ping.
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 04:23:34PM -0400, Marek Polacek wrote:
> has_value_dependent_address wasn't stripping location wrappers so it
> gave the wrong answer for "&x" in the static_assert. That led us to
> thinking that the expression isn't instantiation-dependent, and we
> skipped static i
has_value_dependent_address wasn't stripping location wrappers so it
gave the wrong answer for "&x" in the static_assert. That led us to
thinking that the expression isn't instantiation-dependent, and we
skipped static initialization of A<0>::x.
This patch adds stripping so that has_value_depende
