On 11/14/2011 11:56 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
* function.c (thread_prologue_and_epilogue_insns): Guard
emitting return with single_succ_p test.
Ok.
r~
From: Bernd Schmidt ber...@codesourcery.com
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:51:56 +0100
On 11/11/11 20:13, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
AFAICT, your patch has got sufficiently testing now (on three
targets to boot) to be considered safe to check in. Or is
something amiss?
(If it's the
Someone with approval rights: pretty please?
Can I add my +1 pretty please as well here :) ? According to #c3
this fixes arm-linux-gnueabi cross-builds for C++ as well and
potentially allows this to bootstrap again. I have kicked off a
bootstrap and test run on arm-linux-gnueabi .
cheers
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org writes:
Someone with approval rights: pretty please?
Can I add my +1 pretty please as well here :) ? According to #c3
this fixes arm-linux-gnueabi cross-builds for C++ as well and
potentially allows this to bootstrap again. I have kicked
On 11/14/2011 04:10 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
Looks like all we need is a positive review of
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01409.html and a
ChangeLog entry to unbreak three or more targets.
Someone with approval rights: pretty please?
That patch is ok.
r~
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 07:48:03AM -1000, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 11/14/2011 04:10 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
Looks like all we need is a positive review of
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01409.html and a
ChangeLog entry to unbreak three or more targets.
Someone
From: Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:48:03 +0100
On 11/14/2011 04:10 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
Looks like all we need is a positive review of
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01409.html and a
ChangeLog entry to unbreak three or more targets.
On 11/14/2011 11:56 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 07:48:03AM -1000, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 11/14/2011 04:10 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
Looks like all we need is a positive review of
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01409.html and a
ChangeLog entry to
On 11/15/11 01:43, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 11/14/2011 11:56 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
* function.c (thread_prologue_and_epilogue_insns): Guard
emitting return with single_succ_p test.
Hmm. This looks plausible too.
Bernd's patch made sure that cfglayout didn't do something
From: Bernd Schmidt ber...@codesourcery.com
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 01:54:34 +0100
On 11/15/11 01:43, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 11/14/2011 11:56 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
* function.c (thread_prologue_and_epilogue_insns): Guard
emitting return with single_succ_p test.
Hmm. This looks
10 matches
Mail list logo
