FYI. > On Apr 23, 2020, at 5:13 PM, David Malcolm <dmalc...@redhat.com> wrote: > > May need updating to match the hint message. > > [...] > > This is OK for stage 1 with those nits fixed.
I committed the updated patch with all the suggestions today to gcc11 stage1 as: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:530b44094354758d0dea5374188caa6863647114 <https://gcc.gnu.org/g:530b44094354758d0dea5374188caa6863647114> Thanks. Qing > > There was talk earlier in the thread about fixing this in GCC 10. > > Richi/Jakub: is this OK for stage 4? Although it adds a new command- > line option, it's a workaround for a regression introduced in GCC 6 and > should be low risk. > > Thanks > Dave >
