Re: Fix regrename compare-debug issue

2016-05-09 Thread Bernd Schmidt
On 05/05/2016 09:02 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote: When scanning addresses inside a debug insn, we shouldn't use normal base/index classes. This shows as a compare-debug issue on Alpha, where INDEX_REG_CLASS is NO_REGS, and this prevented a chain from being renamed with debugging turned on. Uros

Re: Fix regrename compare-debug issue

2016-05-05 Thread Eric Botcazou
> When scanning addresses inside a debug insn, we shouldn't use normal > base/index classes. This shows as a compare-debug issue on Alpha, where > INDEX_REG_CLASS is NO_REGS, and this prevented a chain from being > renamed with debugging turned on. > > Uros has reported that this patch resolves

Fix regrename compare-debug issue

2016-05-04 Thread Bernd Schmidt
When scanning addresses inside a debug insn, we shouldn't use normal base/index classes. This shows as a compare-debug issue on Alpha, where INDEX_REG_CLASS is NO_REGS, and this prevented a chain from being renamed with debugging turned on. Uros has reported that this patch resolves the