One update, last Friday, I merged all my patches for counted-by support
(including the Patch to workaround the LTO issue) with the latest trunk,
bootstrapped
and run the testing, everything is good.
Today, when I disabled the Patch that workaround the LTO issue, surprisingly, I
cannot
repeat
> On Jan 22, 2024, at 2:40 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 5:26 PM Qing Zhao wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Jan 19, 2024, at 4:30 AM, Richard Biener
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 3:46 PM Qing Zhao wrote:
> On Jan 17, 2024, at 1:43 AM,
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 5:26 PM Qing Zhao wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 19, 2024, at 4:30 AM, Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 3:46 PM Qing Zhao wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Jan 17, 2024, at 1:43 AM, Richard Biener
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 7:42 AM
> On Jan 19, 2024, at 4:30 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 3:46 PM Qing Zhao wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Jan 17, 2024, at 1:43 AM, Richard Biener
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 7:42 AM Richard Biener
>>> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 9:26 PM
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 3:46 PM Qing Zhao wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 17, 2024, at 1:43 AM, Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 7:42 AM Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 9:26 PM Qing Zhao wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> On Jan 15, 2024, at 4:31 AM,
> On Jan 17, 2024, at 1:43 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 7:42 AM Richard Biener
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 9:26 PM Qing Zhao wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
On Jan 15, 2024, at 4:31 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> All my questions for
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 7:42 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 9:26 PM Qing Zhao wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Jan 15, 2024, at 4:31 AM, Richard Biener
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> All my questions for unshare_expr relate to a LTO bug that I currently
> > >> stuck with
> > >>
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 9:26 PM Qing Zhao wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 15, 2024, at 4:31 AM, Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> >
> >> All my questions for unshare_expr relate to a LTO bug that I currently
> >> stuck with
> >> when using .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE in bound sanitizer (only with -flto, without
>
> On Jan 15, 2024, at 4:31 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>
>> All my questions for unshare_expr relate to a LTO bug that I currently
>> stuck with
>> when using .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE in bound sanitizer (only with -flto, without
>> -flto, no issue):
>>
>> [opc@qinzhao-aarch64-ol8 gcc]$ sh t
>>
> On Jan 15, 2024, at 3:13 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>
>> Okay, so, the "unsharing everything” is done automatically by the compiler
>> before gimplification?
>
> See the blurb at gimplify.cc:835 and below about this.
Thanks a lot for the info. (I read this paragraph before sending the
> On Jan 15, 2024, at 10:06 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 02:54:26PM +, Qing Zhao wrote:
>> So, before gimplification, when inserting tree node, we don’t need manually
>> add unshare_expr since the gimplification will automatically unshare nodes.
>
> There are
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 02:54:26PM +, Qing Zhao wrote:
> So, before gimplification, when inserting tree node, we don’t need manually
> add unshare_expr since the gimplification will automatically unshare nodes.
There are cases where unshare_expr is needed even then, such as the uses in
the
> On Jan 15, 2024, at 4:31 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 6:30 PM Qing Zhao wrote:
>>
>> Thanks a lot for the reply.
>>
>>> On Jan 12, 2024, at 11:28 AM, Richard Biener
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
Am 12.01.2024 um 16:55 schrieb Qing Zhao :
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 6:30 PM Qing Zhao wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot for the reply.
>
> > On Jan 12, 2024, at 11:28 AM, Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >> Am 12.01.2024 um 16:55 schrieb Qing Zhao :
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have some questions on using the utility routine “unshare_expr”:
> Okay, so, the "unsharing everything” is done automatically by the compiler
> before gimplification?
See the blurb at gimplify.cc:835 and below about this.
--
Eric Botcazou
Thanks a lot for the reply.
> On Jan 12, 2024, at 11:28 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> Am 12.01.2024 um 16:55 schrieb Qing Zhao :
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have some questions on using the utility routine “unshare_expr”:
>>
>> From my understanding, there should be NO shared nodes in a
> Am 12.01.2024 um 16:55 schrieb Qing Zhao :
>
> Hi,
>
> I have some questions on using the utility routine “unshare_expr”:
>
> From my understanding, there should be NO shared nodes in a GENERIC function.
> Otherwise, gimplication might fail.
There is sharing and this is why we unshare
Hi,
I have some questions on using the utility routine “unshare_expr”:
From my understanding, there should be NO shared nodes in a GENERIC function.
Otherwise, gimplication might fail.
Therefore, when we insert new tree nodes manually into the GENERIC function, we
should
Make sure there is
18 matches
Mail list logo
