On 03/07/18 07:47 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Here is the updated patch.
* include/bits/stl_algobase.h (__niter_wrap): New.
(__copy_move_a2(_II, _II, _OI)): Use latter.
(__copy_move_backward_a2(_BI1, _BI1, _BI2)): Likewise.
(fill_n(_OI, _Size, const _Tp&)): Likewise.
Here is the updated patch.
* include/bits/stl_algobase.h (__niter_wrap): New.
(__copy_move_a2(_II, _II, _OI)): Use latter.
(__copy_move_backward_a2(_BI1, _BI1, _BI2)): Likewise.
(fill_n(_OI, _Size, const _Tp&)): Likewise.
(equal(_II1, _II1, _II2)): Use
On 01/07/18 21:20 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Here is a new proposal between yours and mine.
It is still adding a function to wrap what __niter_base unwrap, I
called it __nwrap_iter for this reason. But it takes advantage of
Since "niter" refers to __normal_iterator I think a name
Here is a new proposal between yours and mine.
It is still adding a function to wrap what __niter_base unwrap, I
called it __nwrap_iter for this reason. But it takes advantage of
knowing that __niter_base will only unwrap random access iterator to use
an expression to that will do the
On 27/06/2018 22:02, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 27/06/18 21:25 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
On 27/06/2018 02:13, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 26/06/18 17:03 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 18/06/18 23:01 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
I abandon the idea of providing Debug algos, it
On 27/06/18 21:25 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
On 27/06/2018 02:13, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 26/06/18 17:03 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 18/06/18 23:01 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
I abandon the idea of providing Debug algos, it would be too
much code to add and maintain.
On 27/06/2018 02:13, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 26/06/18 17:03 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 18/06/18 23:01 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
I abandon the idea of providing Debug algos, it would be too
much code to add and maintain. However I haven't quit on reducing
Debug mode
On 27/06/18 21:03 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
On 26/06/2018 18:03, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 18/06/18 23:01 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
I abandon the idea of providing Debug algos, it would be too
much code to add and maintain. However I haven't quit on reducing
Debug mode
On 26/06/2018 18:03, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 18/06/18 23:01 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
I abandon the idea of providing Debug algos, it would be too much
code to add and maintain. However I haven't quit on reducing Debug
mode performance impact.
So this patch make use of the
On 26/06/18 17:03 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 18/06/18 23:01 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
I abandon the idea of providing Debug algos, it would be too
much code to add and maintain. However I haven't quit on reducing
Debug mode performance impact.
So this patch make use of
On 18/06/18 23:01 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
I abandon the idea of providing Debug algos, it would be too much
code to add and maintain. However I haven't quit on reducing Debug
mode performance impact.
So this patch make use of the existing std::__niter_base to get
rid of
Hi
I abandon the idea of providing Debug algos, it would be too much
code to add and maintain. However I haven't quit on reducing Debug mode
performance impact.
So this patch make use of the existing std::__niter_base to get rid
of the debug layer around
12 matches
Mail list logo
