dn't count it as a regression.
OK thanks for the comments. I think this can probably wait for stage 1.
I've committed this to trunk now.
commit e41006c3d97121574e9a2f61aea8533c33bd6c40
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date: Fri Apr 6 01:30:19 2018 +0100
PR libstdc++/83860 avoid dangling
On 6 April 2018 at 09:50, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Apr 2018, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
>> This attempts to solve some of the problems when mixing std::valarray
>> operations and 'auto', by storing nested closure objects as values
>> instead of references. This means we don't end up with dangli
On Fri, 6 Apr 2018, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This attempts to solve some of the problems when mixing std::valarray
operations and 'auto', by storing nested closure objects as values
instead of references. This means we don't end up with dangling
references to temporary closures that have already b
erics/valarray/83860.cc: New.
I'll commit this to trunk only for now, unless anybody sees a problem
with the approach, or thinks the layout changes require new mangled
names for the closures.
commit 1dd9f0f54457eb2c44c6b1125800d94eaac0cb2f
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date: Fri Apr 6 01:30
