On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Easwaran Raman era...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Easwaran Raman era...@google.com wrote:
In that case,
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Easwaran Raman era...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Richard Biener
?
Why not simply conservatively use gimple_uid (a) = gimple_uid (b)
in not_dominated_by?
Richard.
Thanks,
Easwaran
2013-05-23 Easwaran Raman era...@google.com
PR tree-optimization/57337
* tree-ssa-reassoc.c (appears_later_in_bb): New function.
(find_insert_point): Correctly identify
.
Thanks,
Easwaran
2013-05-23 Easwaran Raman era...@google.com
PR tree-optimization/57337
* tree-ssa-reassoc.c (appears_later_in_bb): New function.
(find_insert_point): Correctly identify the insertion point
when two statements with the same UID is compared.
Index: gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c
which statement appears earlier in a BB. Bootstraps and no test
regressions in x86_64 on linux. Ok for trunk?
Why not simply conservatively use gimple_uid (a) = gimple_uid (b)
in not_dominated_by?
Richard.
Thanks,
Easwaran
2013-05-23 Easwaran Raman era...@google.com
PR tree
gimple_uid (a) = gimple_uid (b)
in not_dominated_by?
Richard.
Thanks,
Easwaran
2013-05-23 Easwaran Raman era...@google.com
PR tree-optimization/57337
* tree-ssa-reassoc.c (appears_later_in_bb): New function.
(find_insert_point): Correctly identify the insertion point
when two statements
(a) = gimple_uid (b)
in not_dominated_by?
Richard.
Thanks,
Easwaran
2013-05-23 Easwaran Raman era...@google.com
PR tree-optimization/57337
* tree-ssa-reassoc.c (appears_later_in_bb): New function.
(find_insert_point): Correctly identify the insertion point
when two statements
This addresses the case where UID alone is not sufficient to figure
out which statement appears earlier in a BB. Bootstraps and no test
regressions in x86_64 on linux. Ok for trunk?
Thanks,
Easwaran
2013-05-23 Easwaran Raman era...@google.com
PR tree-optimization/57337
* tree-ssa-reassoc.c