As reported in PR 68264, tree-call-cdce.c should be using unordered
comparisons for the range checks, in order to avoid raising FE_INVALID
for quiet NaNs.
Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu and aarch64-linux-gnu. The test failed on
aarch64-linux-gnu before the patch, but it didn't on x86_64-linux-gnu
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> As reported in PR 68264, tree-call-cdce.c should be using unordered
> comparisons for the range checks, in order to avoid raising FE_INVALID
> for quiet NaNs.
>
> Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu and