Re: Ping ** 0.5 patch, fortran] Inline matmul with conjugate complex numbers

Le 21/05/2015 19:51, Thomas Koenig a écrit : Am 18.05.2015 um 00:05 schrieb Thomas Koenig: this patch extends the inline matmul functionality to conjugate complex numbers. Regression-tested. OK for trunk? OK (with the trivial change in the follow-up e-mail)? I'd like to start extending

Ping ** 0.5 patch, fortran] Inline matmul with conjugate complex numbers

Am 18.05.2015 um 00:05 schrieb Thomas Koenig: this patch extends the inline matmul functionality to conjugate complex numbers. Regression-tested. OK for trunk? OK (with the trivial change in the follow-up e-mail)? I'd like to start extending this to TRANSPOSE(CONJG(A)) :-) Thomas

Re: Ping ** 0.5 patch, fortran] Inline matmul with conjugate complex numbers

Hi Mikael, There is little that is specific to conjg (any elemental function would work roughly the same), but anyway, the patch is OK. Conjg has the advantage that it is an extremely cheap function - essentially zero cost. For an arbitrary elemental function, we would have to think about