On 30/10/2017 19:15, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
@@ -1227,7 +1227,12 @@ class Printer(object):
def add_version(self, base, name, function):
self.add(base + name, function)
if _versioned_namespace:
- self.add(base + _versioned_namespace + name, function)
+
On 30/10/17 17:59 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 30/10/17 18:13 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
On 26/10/2017 22:41, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 26/10/17 21:37 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 26/10/17 21:30 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 26/10/17 22:19 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
@@
On 30/10/17 18:13 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
On 26/10/2017 22:41, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 26/10/17 21:37 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 26/10/17 21:30 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 26/10/17 22:19 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
@@ -1232,7 +1232,7 @@ class Printer(object):
# Add a
On 26/10/2017 22:41, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 26/10/17 21:37 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 26/10/17 21:30 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 26/10/17 22:19 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
@@ -1232,7 +1232,7 @@ class Printer(object):
# Add a name using _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_CONTAINER.
On 26/10/17 21:37 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 26/10/17 21:30 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 26/10/17 22:19 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
@@ -1232,7 +1232,7 @@ class Printer(object):
# Add a name using _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_CONTAINER.
def add_container(self, base, name, function):
On 26/10/17 21:30 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 26/10/17 22:19 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
@@ -1232,7 +1232,7 @@ class Printer(object):
# Add a name using _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_CONTAINER.
def add_container(self, base, name, function):
self.add_version(base, name, function)
On 26/10/17 22:19 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
@@ -1232,7 +1232,7 @@ class Printer(object):
# Add a name using _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_CONTAINER.
def add_container(self, base, name, function):
self.add_version(base, name, function)
-self.add_version(base +
Hi
When restoring versioned namespace feature I forgot to check for
the pretty printer tests which are now broken.
Here is the patch to fix those. Tested under Linux x86_64 normal
and versioned namepace modes, ok to commit ?
François
diff --git
On 15/02/17 22:44 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
Here is the end result. I eventually chose to detect usage of
versioned namespace while generating the .gdb file. I haven't use any
caching mecanism considering the limited number of test cases.
Tested under Linux x86_64 with and
On 19/01/17 22:01 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
On 10/01/2017 13:39, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
I've committed the attached patch, which passes the tests for the
default configuration and the versioned namespace configuration.
I added another helper function, strip_versioned_namespace, which is
On 10/01/2017 13:39, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
I've committed the attached patch, which passes the tests for the
default configuration and the versioned namespace configuration.
I added another helper function, strip_versioned_namespace, which is
more expressive than doing
On 09/01/17 21:25 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
On 04/01/2017 13:52, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 24/12/16 14:47 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
I'd prefer not to have to use the regex matches in libstdc++.exp as
they complicate things.
For the two examples above, the whatis results are bad even
On 04/01/2017 13:52, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 24/12/16 14:47 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
I'd prefer not to have to use the regex matches in libstdc++.exp as
they complicate things.
For the two examples above, the whatis results are bad even for the
non-versioned namespace. For
On 24/12/16 14:47 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
On 15/12/2016 15:57, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
And we could avoid three re.match expressions with complicated regular
expressions by creating a helper function to do the "startswith"
checks:
def is_specialization_of(type, template_name):
return
On 15/12/2016 15:57, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
And we could avoid three re.match expressions with complicated regular
expressions by creating a helper function to do the "startswith"
checks:
def is_specialization_of(type, template_name):
return re.match('^std::(%s)?%s<.*>$' % (vers_nsp,
On 14/12/16 22:49 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
On 09/12/2016 16:18, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
But I don't know how to fix this so for the moment I just adapt it
to correctly handle std::__7::string.
But that's not correct. Please try to understand the point I'm making:
The name
On 14/12/16 22:49 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
@@ -1321,7 +1328,7 @@ def register_type_printers(obj):
if not _use_type_printing:
return
-for pfx in ('', 'w'):
+for pfx in ('', 'w', vers_nsp, vers_nsp + 'w'):
add_one_type_printer(obj, 'basic_string', pfx + 'string')
On 14/12/16 22:49 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
On 09/12/2016 16:18, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
But I don't know how to fix this so for the moment I just adapt it
to correctly handle std::__7::string.
But that's not correct. Please try to understand the point I'm making:
The name
On 09/12/2016 16:18, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
But I don't know how to fix this so for the moment I just adapt it to
correctly handle std::__7::string.
But that's not correct. Please try to understand the point I'm making:
The name "std::__7::string" does not appear in a symbol name.
Ok, the
On 09/12/16 13:55 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
On 02/12/2016 01:41, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 01/12/16 22:51 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
We needed the StdExpVerAnyPrinter just because of the loopkup for
'std::string' which has to be 'std::__7::string'. But I used
similar technique exposed
On 02/12/2016 01:41, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 01/12/16 22:51 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
We needed the StdExpVerAnyPrinter just because of the loopkup for
'std::string' which has to be 'std::__7::string'. But I used similar
technique exposed previously to get rid of it.
But I don't see
On 01/12/16 22:51 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
On 29/11/2016 21:17, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 28/11/16 22:19 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
I am not fully happy with the replication in printers.py of
StdRbtreeIteratorPrinter and
StdExpAnyPrinter(SingleObjContainerPrinter in respectively
On 29/11/2016 21:17, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 28/11/16 22:19 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
Here is a patch to fix pretty printers when versioned namespace is
activated.
You will see that I have hesitated in making the fix independant
of the version being used. In source files you
On 28/11/16 22:19 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
Here is a patch to fix pretty printers when versioned namespace is
activated.
You will see that I have hesitated in making the fix independant
of the version being used. In source files you will find (__7::)?
patterns while
Hi
Here is a patch to fix pretty printers when versioned namespace is
activated.
You will see that I have hesitated in making the fix independant of
the version being used. In source files you will find (__7::)? patterns
while in xmethods.py I chose (__\d+::)? making it ready
25 matches
Mail list logo
