RE: [PATCH, ping 1] Move insns without introducing new temporaries in loop2_invariant

2015-05-21 Thread Uros Bizjak
Hello! From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 4:05 AM OK for the trunk. Thanks for your patience, Thanks. Committed with the added PR rtl-optimization/64616 to both ChangeLog entries. This patch caused PR66236 [1]. [1]

Re: [PATCH, ping 1] Move insns without introducing new temporaries in loop2_invariant

2015-05-12 Thread Jeff Law
On 05/12/2015 02:55 AM, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 4:17 AM On 05/06/2015 03:47 AM, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: Ping? Something to consider as future work -- I'm pretty sure PRE sets up the same kind of problematical pattern with

Re: [PATCH, ping 1] Move insns without introducing new temporaries in loop2_invariant

2015-05-12 Thread Jeff Law
On 05/12/2015 03:32 AM, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches- ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Preud'homme From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 4:17 AM + + /* Check that all uses reached by the def in insn

RE: [PATCH, ping 1] Move insns without introducing new temporaries in loop2_invariant

2015-05-12 Thread Thomas Preud'homme
From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 4:17 AM On 05/06/2015 03:47 AM, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: Ping? Something to consider as future work -- I'm pretty sure PRE sets up the same kind of problematical pattern with a new pseudo (reaching reg) holding the

RE: [PATCH, ping 1] Move insns without introducing new temporaries in loop2_invariant

2015-05-12 Thread Thomas Preud'homme
From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 4:05 AM OK for the trunk. Thanks for your patience, Thanks. Committed with the added PR rtl-optimization/64616 to both ChangeLog entries. Best regards, Thomas

RE: [PATCH, ping 1] Move insns without introducing new temporaries in loop2_invariant

2015-05-12 Thread Thomas Preud'homme
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches- ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Preud'homme From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 4:17 AM + + /* Check that all uses reached by the def in insn would still be reached + it.

Re: [PATCH, ping 1] Move insns without introducing new temporaries in loop2_invariant

2015-05-11 Thread Jeff Law
On 05/06/2015 03:47 AM, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: Ping? Something to consider as future work -- I'm pretty sure PRE sets up the same kind of problematical pattern with a new pseudo (reaching reg) holding the result of the redundant expression and the original evaluations turned into copies

RE: [PATCH, ping 1] Move insns without introducing new temporaries in loop2_invariant

2015-05-06 Thread Thomas Preud'homme
Ping? Best regards, Thomas -Original Message- From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches- ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Preud'homme Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 8:39 PM To: 'Steven Bosscher' Cc: GCC Patches; Eric Botcazou Subject: RE: [PATCH, stage1] Move