On 03/03/15 17:59, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Kyrylo Tkachov
Sent: 27 February 2015 14:30
To: Kyrylo Tkachov; GCC Patches
Cc: Ramana Radhakrishnan; Richard Earnshaw
Subject: RE: [PATCH][ARM] PR target/64600 Fix another ICE with -
mtune=xscale: properly sign
-Original Message-
From: Kyrylo Tkachov
Sent: 27 February 2015 14:30
To: Kyrylo Tkachov; GCC Patches
Cc: Ramana Radhakrishnan; Richard Earnshaw
Subject: RE: [PATCH][ARM] PR target/64600 Fix another ICE with -
mtune=xscale: properly sign-extend mask during constant splitting
On 03/02/15 15:18, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
The ICE in this PR occurs when -mtune=xscale triggers a particular path
through arm_gen_constant during expand
that creates a 0xf00f mask but for a 64-bit HOST_WIDE_INT doesn't
sign extend it into
0xf00f that signifies the
another ICE with -
mtune=xscale: properly sign-extend mask during constant splitting
Ping.
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 10/02/15 09:25, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Ping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg00141.html
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 03/02/15 15:18, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all
Ping.
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 10/02/15 09:25, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Ping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg00141.html
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 03/02/15 15:18, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
The ICE in this PR occurs when -mtune=xscale triggers a particular path
through arm_gen_constant
Ping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg00141.html
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 03/02/15 15:18, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
The ICE in this PR occurs when -mtune=xscale triggers a particular path
through arm_gen_constant during expand
that creates a 0xf00f mask but for a 64-bit