On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 06:07:16PM +, Tamar Christina wrote:
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-early-break_100-pr113287.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-early-break_100-pr113287.c
When the testcase was being adjusted for unsigned long -> unsigned long long,
two spots using long
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 06:07:16PM +, Tamar Christina wrote:
> This changes the tests I committed for PR113287 to also
> run on targets that don't support bitint.
>
> Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu and no issues and
> tests run on both.
>
> Ok for master?
Yes,
> But I'm afraid I have no idea how is this supposed to work on
> non-bitint targets or where __BITINT_MAXWIDTH__ is smaller than 9020.
> There is no loop at all there, so what should be vectorized?
>
Yeah It was giving an unresolved and I didn't notice in diff.
> I'd say introduce
> # Return 1
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 04:55:00PM +, Tamar Christina wrote:
> PR tree-optimization/113287
> * gcc.dg/vect/vect-early-break_100-pr113287.c: Support non-bitint.
This part is ok.
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-early-break_99-pr113287.c
> +++
