al Message-
> > From: Kirill Yukhin [mailto:kirill.yuk...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2018 11:49 AM
> > To: Koval, Julia <julia.ko...@intel.com>
> > Cc: 'Jakub Jelinek' <ja...@redhat.com>; 'Uros Bizjak' <ubiz...@gmail.com>;
> >
edhat.com>; 'Uros Bizjak' <ubiz...@gmail.com>;
> 'GCC Patches' <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix various x86 avx512{bitalg, vpopcntdq, vbmi2} issues
> (PR
> target/83488)
>
> Hello Julia,
> On 12 Jan 08:55, Koval, Julia wrote:
> >
Hello Julia,
On 12 Jan 08:55, Koval, Julia wrote:
> Changelog
>
> gcc/
> * config/i386/avx512bitalgintrin.h (_mm512_bitshuffle_epi64_mask,
> _mm512_mask_bitshuffle_epi64_mask, _mm256_bitshuffle_epi64_mask,
> _mm256_mask_bitshuffle_epi64_mask, _mm_bitshuffle_epi64_mask,
>
CC Patches' <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] Fix various x86 avx512{bitalg,vpopcntdq,vbmi2} issues (PR
> target/83488)
>
> Hi,
>
> What do you think about changing these types to UHI_FTYPE_V16QI_V16QI_UHI
> and so on?
> In docs it is (KL, VL) = (16,128)
> Sent: Monday, December 25, 2017 1:01 PM
> To: Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>; Kirill Yukhin <kirill.yuk...@gmail.com>;
> Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com>
> Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] Fix various x86 avx512{bita
Thank you very much for fixing those issues.
Note, __builtin_ia32_vpshufbitqmb{128,256,512}_mask are implemented
> incorrectly, can somebody from Intel handle that? The inlines in the
> intrinsic header look correct, but the builtins aren't and what's even worse
> is that the define_insns are
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 07:40:11PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Starting bootstrap/regtest on x86_64-linux and i686-linux right now, ok for
> trunk if it passes?
Bootstrapped/regtested successfully on both.
Jakub
