Toon Moene writes:
> On 2/1/24 22:33, Tamar Christina wrote:
>
>> Bootstrapped Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu no
>> issues.
>> Also checked both with --enable-lto --with-build-config='bootstrap-O3
>> bootstrap-lto' --enable-multilib
>> and --enable-lto
> Am 01.02.2024 um 22:34 schrieb Tamar Christina :
>
>
>>
>>>
>>> If the above is correct then I think I understand what you're saying and
>>> will update the patch and do some Checks.
>>
>> Yes, I think that's what I wanted to say.
>>
>
> As discussed:
>
> Bootstrapped Regtested on
On 2/1/24 22:33, Tamar Christina wrote:
Bootstrapped Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu no
issues.
Also checked both with --enable-lto --with-build-config='bootstrap-O3
bootstrap-lto' --enable-multilib
and --enable-lto --with-build-config=bootstrap-O3
> >
> > If the above is correct then I think I understand what you're saying and
> > will update the patch and do some Checks.
>
> Yes, I think that's what I wanted to say.
>
As discussed:
Bootstrapped Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu no
issues.
Also checked both
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024, Tamar Christina wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Richard Biener
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2024 9:51 AM
> > To: Tamar Christina
> > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd ; j...@ventanamicro.com
> > Subject: Re: [PAT
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Biener
> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2024 9:51 AM
> To: Tamar Christina
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd ; j...@ventanamicro.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH]middle-end: check memory accesses in the destination block
> [PR113588].
>
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024, Tamar Christina wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> When analyzing loads for early break it was always the intention that
> for the exit where things get moved to we only check the loads that can
> be reached from the condition.
Looking at the code I'm a bit confused that we always move