On 29 October 2014 10:28, Zhenqiang Chen zhenqiang.c...@arm.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Richard Henderson [mailto:r...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 10:56 PM
To: Zhenqiang Chen
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Ping] [PATCH, 1/10] two hooks
-Original Message-
From: Richard Henderson [mailto:r...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 10:56 PM
To: Zhenqiang Chen
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Ping] [PATCH, 1/10] two hooks for conditional compare (ccmp)
On 10/27/2014 12:47 AM, Zhenqiang Chen wrote
On 10/29/2014 03:28 AM, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
Thanks! Patch is updated.
Ok.
r~
Thanks for the comments. All comments are accepted and the updated patch is
attached.
-Zhenqiang
-Original Message-
From: Richard Henderson [mailto:r...@redhat.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2014 11:00 PM
To: Zhenqiang Chen; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Ping] [PATCH, 1/10
On 10/27/2014 12:47 AM, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
+ @var{NULL} if the combination of @var{prev} and this comparison is\n\
@code{NULL}
Otherwise ok.
r~
On 09/22/2014 11:43 PM, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
+@cindex @code{ccmp} instruction pattern
+@item @samp{ccmp}
+Conditional compare instruction. Operand 2 and 5 are RTLs which perform
+two comparisons. Operand 1 is AND or IOR, which operates on the result of
+operand 2 and 5.
+It uses
On Sep 22, 2014, at 11:43 PM, Zhenqiang Chen zhenqiang.c...@arm.com wrote:
Ping?
Patch is attached for easy to apply.
Note I have been using an earlier version of this patch set in house and not
have found any issues with it.
Thanks,
Andrew
Thanks!
-Zhenqiang
-Original
