Re: RFA: PATCH to use -std=c++98 in stage 1 of bootstrap

2015-05-21 Thread Jason Merrill
On 05/20/2015 06:11 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote: The only serious problem with the patch is that it changes Makefile.in, but not the corresponding part of Makefile.tpl from which it is generated. Ok with that change. Now, if you'd also update the comments just before it, that still suggest we

RFA: PATCH to use -std=c++98 in stage 1 of bootstrap

2015-05-20 Thread Jason Merrill
I want to explicitly pass -std=c++98 to the compiler used in building stage 1. Does this seem like the right way to do that? Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. commit 97e77ef17e558cdb6d26d440e691fea710e2a2dc Author: Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com Date: Mon May 18 23:58:41 2015 -0400 *

Re: RFA: PATCH to use -std=c++98 in stage 1 of bootstrap

2015-05-20 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On May 20, 2015, Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com wrote: I want to explicitly pass -std=c++98 to the compiler used in building stage 1. Does this seem like the right way to do that? It certainly works, but I'm a bit concerned about its overriding the earlier choices of STAGE1_CXXFLAGS, that use