On Thu, 22 Jun 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Marc Glisse
wrote:
Hello,
I was asked to handle (const) fenv_t and
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Marc Glisse
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I was asked to handle (const) fenv_t and fexcept_t the same way as
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
I was asked to handle (const) fenv_t and fexcept_t the same way as FILE and
const tm. Since these have special handling in quite a few places, it seems
necessary to
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was asked to handle (const) fenv_t and fexcept_t the same way as FILE and
> const tm. Since these have special handling in quite a few places, it seems
> necessary to make their support a bit more generic
Hello,
I was asked to handle (const) fenv_t and fexcept_t the same way as FILE
and const tm. Since these have special handling in quite a few places, it
seems necessary to make their support a bit more generic first. If I
didn't mess up, this patch should not change anything.
Bootstrap +