On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 2:15 PM Marc Glisse wrote:
>
> On Fri, 7 Aug 2020, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 10:33 AM Marc Glisse wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 7 Aug 2020, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 8:07 PM Marc Glisse wrote:
>
> On Thu, 6 Aug
On Fri, 7 Aug 2020, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 10:33 AM Marc Glisse wrote:
On Fri, 7 Aug 2020, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 8:07 PM Marc Glisse wrote:
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Was I on the right track configuring with
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 10:33 AM Marc Glisse wrote:
>
> On Fri, 7 Aug 2020, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 8:07 PM Marc Glisse wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 6 Aug 2020, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> >>
> Was I on the right track configuring with
>
On Fri, 7 Aug 2020, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 8:07 PM Marc Glisse wrote:
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Was I on the right track configuring with
--target=arm-none-linux-gnueabihf --with-cpu=cortex-a9
--with-fpu=neon-fp16
then compiling without any special
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 8:07 PM Marc Glisse wrote:
>
> On Thu, 6 Aug 2020, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>
> >> Was I on the right track configuring with
> >> --target=arm-none-linux-gnueabihf --with-cpu=cortex-a9
> >> --with-fpu=neon-fp16
> >> then compiling without any special option?
> >
> > Maybe you
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Was I on the right track configuring with
--target=arm-none-linux-gnueabihf --with-cpu=cortex-a9
--with-fpu=neon-fp16
then compiling without any special option?
Maybe you also need --with-float=hard, I don't remember if it's
implied by the 'hf'
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 13:42, Marc Glisse wrote:
>
> On Thu, 6 Aug 2020, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 11:06, Marc Glisse wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 6 Aug 2020, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> >>
> > 2020-08-05 Marc Glisse
> >
> > PR tree-optimization/95906
>
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 11:06, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020, Christophe Lyon wrote:
2020-08-05 Marc Glisse
PR tree-optimization/95906
PR target/70314
* match.pd ((c ? a : b) op d, (c ? a : b) op (c ? d : e),
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 11:06, Marc Glisse wrote:
>
> On Thu, 6 Aug 2020, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>
> >>> 2020-08-05 Marc Glisse
> >>>
> >>> PR tree-optimization/95906
> >>> PR target/70314
> >>> * match.pd ((c ? a : b) op d, (c ? a : b) op (c ? d : e),
> >>> (v ?
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 10:17 AM Christophe Lyon
wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 at 16:24, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 3:33 PM Marc Glisse wrote:
New version that passed bootstrap+regtest during the night.
When
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 10:17 AM Christophe Lyon
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 at 16:24, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 3:33 PM Marc Glisse wrote:
> > >
> > > New version that passed bootstrap+regtest during the night.
> > >
> > > When vector
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020, Christophe Lyon wrote:
2020-08-05 Marc Glisse
PR tree-optimization/95906
PR target/70314
* match.pd ((c ? a : b) op d, (c ? a : b) op (c ? d : e),
(v ? w : 0) ? a : b, c1 ? c2 ? a : b : b): New transformations.
(op (c ? a : b)):
Hi,
On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 at 16:24, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 3:33 PM Marc Glisse wrote:
> >
> > New version that passed bootstrap+regtest during the night.
> >
> > When vector comparisons were forced to use vec_cond_expr, we lost a number
> > of
> >
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 3:33 PM Marc Glisse wrote:
>
> New version that passed bootstrap+regtest during the night.
>
> When vector comparisons were forced to use vec_cond_expr, we lost a number of
> optimizations (my fault for not adding enough testcases to prevent that).
> This patch tries to
New version that passed bootstrap+regtest during the night.
When vector comparisons were forced to use vec_cond_expr, we lost a number of
optimizations (my fault for not adding enough testcases to prevent that).
This patch tries to unwrap vec_cond_expr a bit so some optimizations can
still
15 matches
Mail list logo
