[gomp4] Re: acc_on_device for device_type_host_nonshm

2015-06-03 Thread Tom de Vries
On 28/05/15 15:16, Julian Brown wrote: On Thu, 28 May 2015 04:48:58 -0700 H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 4:10 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 01:02:12PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: Hi! On Thu, 7 May 2015 19:32:26 +0100, Julian

[PR libgomp/65742, PR middle-end/66332] XFAIL acc_on_device compile-time evaluation (was: acc_on_device for device_type_host_nonshm)

2015-06-02 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On Thu, 7 May 2015 19:32:26 +0100, Julian Brown jul...@codesourcery.com wrote: On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 15:16:19 +0200 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 05:43:26PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: Really, acc_on_device is implemented as a compiler builtin (which

Re: acc_on_device for device_type_host_nonshm

2015-05-28 Thread H.J. Lu
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 4:10 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 01:02:12PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: Hi! On Thu, 7 May 2015 19:32:26 +0100, Julian Brown jul...@codesourcery.com wrote: Here's a new version of the patch [...] OK for trunk? Makes sense

Re: acc_on_device for device_type_host_nonshm

2015-05-28 Thread Julian Brown
On Thu, 28 May 2015 04:48:58 -0700 H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 4:10 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 01:02:12PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: Hi! On Thu, 7 May 2015 19:32:26 +0100, Julian Brown jul...@codesourcery.com

Re: acc_on_device for device_type_host_nonshm

2015-05-21 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 01:02:12PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: Hi! On Thu, 7 May 2015 19:32:26 +0100, Julian Brown jul...@codesourcery.com wrote: Here's a new version of the patch [...] OK for trunk? Makes sense to me (with just a request to drop the testsuite changes, see

Re: acc_on_device for device_type_host_nonshm

2015-05-21 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On Thu, 7 May 2015 19:32:26 +0100, Julian Brown jul...@codesourcery.com wrote: Here's a new version of the patch [...] OK for trunk? Makes sense to me (with just a request to drop the testsuite changes, see below), to get the existing regressions under control. Jakub? PR

Re: acc_on_device for device_type_host_nonshm (was: libgomp nvptx plugin: rework initialisation and support the proposed load/unload hooks) (PR65742)

2015-05-07 Thread Julian Brown
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 15:16:19 +0200 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 05:43:26PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:15:02 +0100, Julian Brown jul...@codesourcery.com wrote: On Wed, 8 Apr 2015 17:58:56 +0300 Ilya Verbin iver...@gmail.com

Re: acc_on_device for device_type_host_nonshm (was: libgomp nvptx plugin: rework initialisation and support the proposed load/unload hooks)

2015-04-17 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 05:43:26PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:15:02 +0100, Julian Brown jul...@codesourcery.com wrote: On Wed, 8 Apr 2015 17:58:56 +0300 Ilya Verbin iver...@gmail.com wrote: I see several regressions: FAIL:

acc_on_device for device_type_host_nonshm (was: libgomp nvptx plugin: rework initialisation and support the proposed load/unload hooks)

2015-04-14 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:15:02 +0100, Julian Brown jul...@codesourcery.com wrote: On Wed, 8 Apr 2015 17:58:56 +0300 Ilya Verbin iver...@gmail.com wrote: I see several regressions: FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_on_device-1.c -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host_nonshm=1