Hi!
On 2024-01-24T12:43:04+, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> This [...]
... became commit 99890e15527f1f04caef95ecdd135c9f1a077f08
"amdgcn: additional gfx1030/gfx1100 support", and included the following:
> --- a/gcc/config/gcn/gcn-valu.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/gcn/gcn-valu.md
> @@ -3555,30 +3555,63 @@
> ;; }}}
> ;; {{{ Int/int conversions
>
> +(define_code_iterator all_convert [truncate zero_extend sign_extend])
> (define_code_iterator zero_convert [truncate zero_extend])
> (define_code_attr convop [
> (sign_extend "extend")
> (zero_extend "zero_extend")
> (truncate "trunc")])
>
> -(define_insn "2"
> +(define_expand "2"
> + [(set (match_operand:V_INT_1REG 0 "register_operand" "=v")
> +(all_convert:V_INT_1REG
> + (match_operand:V_INT_1REG_ALT 1 "gcn_alu_operand" " v")))]
> + "")
> +
> +(define_insn "*_sdwa"
>[(set (match_operand:V_INT_1REG 0 "register_operand" "=v")
> (zero_convert:V_INT_1REG
> (match_operand:V_INT_1REG_ALT 1 "gcn_alu_operand" " v")))]
> - ""
> + "!TARGET_RDNA3"
>"v_mov_b32_sdwa\t%0, %1 dst_sel: dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD
> src0_sel:"
>[(set_attr "type" "vop_sdwa")
> (set_attr "length" "8")])
>
> -(define_insn "extend2"
> +(define_insn "extend_sdwa"
>[(set (match_operand:V_INT_1REG 0 "register_operand" "=v")
> (sign_extend:V_INT_1REG
> (match_operand:V_INT_1REG_ALT 1 "gcn_alu_operand" " v")))]
> - ""
> + "!TARGET_RDNA3"
>"v_mov_b32_sdwa\t%0, sext(%1) src0_sel:"
>[(set_attr "type" "vop_sdwa")
> (set_attr "length" "8")])
>
> +(define_insn "*_shift"
> + [(set (match_operand:V_INT_1REG 0 "register_operand" "=v")
> +(all_convert:V_INT_1REG
> + (match_operand:V_INT_1REG_ALT 1 "gcn_alu_operand" " v")))]
> + "TARGET_RDNA3"
> + {
> +enum {extend, zero_extend, trunc};
> +rtx shiftwidth = (mode == QImode
> + || mode == QImode
> + ? GEN_INT (24)
> + : mode == HImode
> + || mode == HImode
> + ? GEN_INT (16)
> + : NULL);
> +operands[2] = shiftwidth;
> +
> +if (!shiftwidth)
> + return "v_mov_b32 %0, %1";
> + else if ( == extend || == trunc)
> + return "v_lshlrev_b32\t%0, %2, %1\;v_ashrrev_i32\t%0, %2, %0";
> +else
> + return "v_lshlrev_b32\t%0, %2, %1\;v_lshrrev_b32\t%0, %2, %0";
> + }
> + [(set_attr "type" "mult")
> + (set_attr "length" "8")])
OK to push the attached
"amdgcn: additional gfx1030/gfx1100 support: adjust test cases"?
Tested 'gcn.exp' for all '-march'es.
Grüße
Thomas
>From 04b83e9aa19b02b9805e03f31db14325bb00e737 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Schwinge
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 10:40:39 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] amdgcn: additional gfx1030/gfx1100 support: adjust test cases
The "SDWA" changes in commit 99890e15527f1f04caef95ecdd135c9f1a077f08
"amdgcn: additional gfx1030/gfx1100 support" caused a few regressions:
PASS: gcc.target/gcn/sram-ecc-3.c (test for excess errors)
[-PASS:-]{+FAIL:+} gcc.target/gcn/sram-ecc-3.c scan-assembler zero_extendv64qiv64si2
PASS: gcc.target/gcn/sram-ecc-4.c (test for excess errors)
[-PASS:-]{+FAIL:+} gcc.target/gcn/sram-ecc-4.c scan-assembler zero_extendv64hiv64si2
PASS: gcc.target/gcn/sram-ecc-7.c (test for excess errors)
[-PASS:-]{+FAIL:+} gcc.target/gcn/sram-ecc-7.c scan-assembler zero_extendv64qiv64si2
PASS: gcc.target/gcn/sram-ecc-8.c (test for excess errors)
[-PASS:-]{+FAIL:+} gcc.target/gcn/sram-ecc-8.c scan-assembler zero_extendv64hiv64si2
Those test cases need corresponding adjustment.
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.target/gcn/sram-ecc-3.c: Adjust.
* gcc.target/gcn/sram-ecc-4.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/gcn/sram-ecc-7.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/gcn/sram-ecc-8.c: Likewise.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/gcn/sram-ecc-3.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/gcn/sram-ecc-4.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/gcn/sram-ecc-7.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/gcn/sram-ecc-8.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/gcn/sram-ecc-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/gcn/sram-ecc-3.c
index 692d4578b66..bc89e3542d2 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/gcn/sram-ecc-
