On 3 July 2014 10:34, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
On 03-07-14 10:20, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
On 2 July 2014 09:02, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
On 02-07-14 08:23, Marc Glisse wrote:
In the first example you gave, looking at the pattern (no match_dup,
setting
On 7 July 2014 11:29, Christophe Lyon christophe.l...@linaro.org wrote:
On 3 July 2014 10:34, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
On 03-07-14 10:20, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
On 2 July 2014 09:02, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
On 02-07-14 08:23, Marc Glisse wrote:
In the
On 2 July 2014 09:02, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
On 02-07-14 08:23, Marc Glisse wrote:
In the first example you gave, looking at the pattern (no match_dup,
setting the
full register), it seems that it may have wanted = instead of +.
[ move discussion from gcc ml to
On 03-07-14 10:20, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
On 2 July 2014 09:02, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
On 02-07-14 08:23, Marc Glisse wrote:
In the first example you gave, looking at the pattern (no match_dup,
setting the
full register), it seems that it may have wanted = instead of +.
On 01-07-14 21:47, Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/01/14 13:27, Tom de Vries wrote:
So my question is: is the combination of '' and '+' supported ? If so,
what is the exact semantics ? If not, should we warn or give an error ?
I don't think we can define any reasonable semantics for +. My
On 02-07-14 08:23, Marc Glisse wrote:
In the first example you gave, looking at the pattern (no match_dup, setting the
full register), it seems that it may have wanted = instead of +.
[ move discussion from gcc ml to gcc-patches ml ]
Marcus,
The + constraint on operand 0 of
On 02/07/14 08:52, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 01-07-14 21:47, Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/01/14 13:27, Tom de Vries wrote:
So my question is: is the combination of '' and '+' supported ? If so,
what is the exact semantics ? If not, should we warn or give an error ?
I don't think we can define any
