Re: fix for 48208 and 48260 on darwin

2011-03-30 Thread Mike Stump
On Mar 30, 2011, at 5:41 AM, gcchelp.5.ad...@0sg.net wrote:
 Tests that now fail, but worked before:
 
 g++.dg/warn/Wstrict-aliasing-float-ref-int-obj.C  (test for warnings, line 7)
 
 Tests that now work, but didn't before:
 
 g++.dg/warn/Wstrict-aliasing-float-ref-int-obj.C  (test for warnings, line 7)

Yeah, someone thought it would be funny to have two test cases with the same 
exact name, and then to have one of them fail and the other one work, so, 
technically, what it said is true.

I've now applied the patch for you.  In the future, by sure to attach the diffs 
as a file, as Mail eats white spacing in odd ways which corrupts patches.

Thanks.


2011-03-30  Christian Schüler  cschue...@gmx.de

PR/driver 48208
* config/c.opt (F): Added 'Driver' to -F option.
PR/driver 48260
* config/darwin-driver.c (darwin_driver_init): Add '-arch' to handler 
function.
* config/darwin.opt: Added '-arch' option.

Index: c-family/c.opt
===
--- c-family/c.opt  (revision 171691)
+++ c-family/c.opt  (working copy)
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@
 C ObjC C++ ObjC++ Undocumented Var(flag_preprocess_only)
 
 F
-C ObjC C++ ObjC++ Joined Separate MissingArgError(missing path after %qs)
+Driver C ObjC C++ ObjC++ Joined Separate MissingArgError(missing path after 
%qs)
 -F dir   Add dir to the end of the main framework include path
 
 H
Index: config/darwin.opt
===
--- config/darwin.opt   (revision 171691)
+++ config/darwin.opt   (working copy)
@@ -31,6 +31,9 @@
 allowable_client
 Driver Separate Alias(Zallowable_client)
 
+arch
+Driver RejectNegative Separate
+
 arch_errors_fatal
 Driver Alias(Zarch_errors_fatal)
 
Index: config/darwin-driver.c
===
--- config/darwin-driver.c  (revision 171691)
+++ config/darwin-driver.c  (working copy)
@@ -161,6 +161,15 @@
continue;
   switch ((*decoded_options)[i].opt_index)
{
+#if DARWIN_X86
+   case OPT_arch:
+ if (!strcmp ((*decoded_options)[i].arg, i386))
+   generate_option (OPT_m32, NULL, 1, CL_DRIVER, 
(*decoded_options)[i]);
+ else if (!strcmp ((*decoded_options)[i].arg, x86_64))
+   generate_option (OPT_m64, NULL, 1, CL_DRIVER, 
(*decoded_options)[i]);
+ break;
+#endif
+
case OPT_filelist:
case OPT_framework:
  ++*decoded_options_count;





Re: fix for 48208 and 48260 on darwin

2011-03-28 Thread IainS

Hi Christian,

On 28 Mar 2011, at 04:55, Christian Schüler wrote:


F
-C ObjC C++ ObjC++ Joined Separate MissingArgError(missing path  
after %qs)
+Driver C ObjC C++ ObjC++ Joined Separate MissingArgError(missing  
path after \

%qs)
-F dir  Add dir to the end of the main framework include path


This looks right (but I cannot approve it).

+++ gcc-4.6.0-RC-20110321-patched/gcc/config/darwin-driver.c	 
2011-03-26

07:01:02.0 +0100
@@ -161,6 +161,13 @@
continue;
  switch ((*decoded_options)[i].opt_index)
{
+#if DARWIN_X86
+   case OPT_arch:
+ if (!strcmp ((*decoded_options)[i].arg, i386))
+		generate_option (OPT_m32, NULL, 1, CL_DRIVER, (*decoded_options) 
[i]);

+ else if (!strcmp ((*decoded_options)[i].arg, x86_64))
+		generate_option (OPT_m64, NULL, 1, CL_DRIVER, (*decoded_options) 
[i]);

+ break;
+#endif


Hm - this doesn't quite cover the scenario - what about people using  
GCC on powerpc*-darwin9?

(or people on x86-darwin10 targeting powerpc on darwin9)?

Normally, the arch option is recognized (and swallowed) by the  
Apple way 'driverdriver.c' program which then emits the right driver  
lines for the arch (and deals with cross-compiler lines for ppc).


driverdriver.c is available from the Apple Local GCC open source  
releases (e.g. http://opensource.apple.com/source/gcc/gcc-5646/driverdriver.c)

- it's at the top of the source tree
- it builds OK against gcc-4.5 headers  - which is OK, since it's a  
stand-alone program that just manipulates command lines (doesn't  
compile against gcc-4.6 headers because of the changes in option  
handling)


[I guess someone should cook up one for gcc/contrib that works with  
our new system].


One then builds the {ppc,x86}-apple-darwin* compilers, installs them  
and you have a working set that does the Apple way layer on top of  
GCC.


This works (at least a few weeks ago) - since I managed to get pre- 
release 4.6 going within XCode - but needs a couple more small patches  
to deal with other options.


---

-- ping me off list, if you would like to try this and I'll try and  
send more detailed instructions and a couple of additional patches  
that are work in progress ... 


--

however, I can neither approve nor reject your patches ;-)
cheers
Iain



Re: fix for 48208 and 48260 on darwin

2011-03-28 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Christian Schüler wrote:

   PR 48208
   * config/c.opt: Added 'Driver' to -F option

This part of the changes is OK with the ChangeLog entry fixed (it should 
go in c-family/ChangeLog):

PR driver/48208
* c.opt (-F): Add Driver.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com

Re: fix for 48208 and 48260 on darwin

2011-03-28 Thread Mike Stump
On Mar 27, 2011, at 8:55 PM, Christian Schüler wrote:
 please review the following patch (and besides, bear with me as this is the 
 first patch proposal from me). For gcc 4.5 and earlier it was possible to 
 configure xcode via a modified xcplugin to use the newer gcc directly (yes, 
 the -arch flag was ignored during link time, but since I had -m32/-m64 
 anyways, this didn't matter). With the new argument checking of version 4.6 
 during the linking stage this is no longer possible. The proposed patch makes 
 gcc on darwin recognize the -arch flag to the extent necessary to reinstate 
 the old functionality. Besides, it fixes the already existing support for the
 -F flag.

Ok (when regression tested).  Did you run the gcc regression testsuite on it?  
To install it, we'd need a testsuite run on it.  Roughy, run the testsuite 
before your patch, save off the .sum file, run it after your patch, then run 
contrib/compare_tests before.sum after.sum and see if there is any output.  You 
might need expect/tcl/dejagnu installed to do that.



If you want to contribute longer term (larger patches), you'll want to get 
started on your paper work, if you've not done that already.  And, welcome.  
Before you say, but...  let me say, what took so long, 10 years is a long 
while?  :-)