Re: libgo patch committed: Update to current version of Go library

2013-02-08 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:07 AM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote: I did hit one new error that seems related: --- FAIL: TestChtimes (0.00 seconds) os_test.go:681: AccessTime didn't go backwards;

Re: libgo patch committed: Update to current version of Go library

2013-02-08 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:07 AM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote: I did hit one new error that seems related: --- FAIL: TestChtimes (0.00 seconds)

Re: libgo patch committed: Update to current version of Go library

2013-02-08 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote: I did hit one new error that seems related: --- FAIL: TestChtimes (0.00 seconds) os_test.go:681: AccessTime didn't go backwards; was={63495872497 0 47130825733376}, after={63495872497 0 47130825733376}

Re: libgo patch committed: Update to current version of Go library

2013-02-08 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote: I did hit one new error that seems related: --- FAIL: TestChtimes (0.00 seconds) os_test.go:681: AccessTime didn't go backwards;

Re: libgo patch committed: Update to current version of Go library

2013-02-08 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote: I did hit one new error that seems related: --- FAIL: TestChtimes (0.00

Re: libgo patch committed: Update to current version of Go library

2013-02-08 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote: utimensat returns zero on CentOS. Following is gdb session: Thanks--can you do the same session but with step instead of next? Ian

Re: libgo patch committed: Update to current version of Go library

2013-02-08 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote: utimensat returns zero on CentOS. Following is gdb session: Thanks--can you do the same session but with step instead of next? I think I got the

Re: libgo patch committed: Update to current version of Go library

2013-02-08 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote: utimensat returns zero on CentOS. Following is gdb session: Thanks--can you do the

Re: libgo patch committed: Update to current version of Go library

2013-02-08 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote: Please note, that looking at generated libcalls.go, there are many other possible signed/unsigned issues of the same type. Since this all happens on x86_64 (where go int is apparently 64bit), it looks that it is very

Re: libgo patch committed: Update to current version of Go library

2013-02-07 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote: Hello! I've committed a patch to upgrade libgo to the current version of the master Go library. As usual, this mail message only includes the changes

Re: libgo patch committed: Update to current version of Go library

2013-02-07 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:26 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks, I have tested it on CentOS 5.9. However, for some reason, I got unrelated linker errors that prevents further testing: === libgo tests === ./a.out: error while loading shared libraries:

Re: libgo patch committed: Update to current version of Go library

2013-02-07 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:26 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks, I have tested it on CentOS 5.9. However, for some reason, I got unrelated linker errors that prevents further testing: ===

Re: libgo patch committed: Update to current version of Go library

2013-02-05 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote: Hello! I've committed a patch to upgrade libgo to the current version of the master Go library. As usual, this mail message only includes the changes to files that are specific to gccgo. Bootstrapped and ran Go testsuite

Re: libgo patch committed: Update to current version of Go library

2013-01-03 Thread Uros Bizjak
Hello! I've committed a patch to upgrade libgo to the current version of the master Go library. As usual, this mail message only includes the changes to files that are specific to gccgo. Bootstrapped and ran Go testsuite on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Committed to mainline. This caused

libgo patch committed: Update to current version of Go library

2012-12-25 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
I've committed a patch to upgrade libgo to the current version of the master Go library. As usual, this mail message only includes the changes to files that are specific to gccgo. Bootstrapped and ran Go testsuite on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Committed to mainline. Ian diff -r 1faae2fad711

libgo patch committed: Update to current version of Go library

2011-03-24 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
I've committed a patch to libgo to update to the current version of the master Go library. The patch is too large to include here, and is in any case simply a copy of changes available in the master Go library repository. See SVN or http://codereview.appspot.com/4281068/ for the changes as