On 11/11/14 10:49 +0100, FX wrote:
The patch below break bootstrap on darwin
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63811):
Fix std::deque move construction with non-equal allocators.
* include/bits/stl_deque.h (_Deque_base::_Deque_base(_Deque_base&&)):
Dispatch accordi
The patch below break bootstrap on darwin
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63811):
> Fix std::deque move construction with non-equal allocators.
>
> * include/bits/stl_deque.h (_Deque_base::_Deque_base(_Deque_base&&)):
> Dispatch according to whether allocators are alway
On 05/11/14 17:49 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 5 November 2014 14:14, David Edelsohn wrote:
Jonathan,
I still am seeing new failures in the libstdc++ deque testsuite as of
last night. I don't know if you still are working through the fallout
from the earlier patches, but I wanted to make y
On 5 November 2014 14:14, David Edelsohn wrote:
> Jonathan,
>
> I still am seeing new failures in the libstdc++ deque testsuite as of
> last night. I don't know if you still are working through the fallout
> from the earlier patches, but I wanted to make you aware.
Yes, those tests are meant to f
Jonathan,
I still am seeing new failures in the libstdc++ deque testsuite as of
last night. I don't know if you still are working through the fallout
from the earlier patches, but I wanted to make you aware.
AIX defaults to 32 bit. A template was not initialized for int?
FAIL: 23_containers/deq