This one is a fix for something that could currently only affect c6x,
but I have code that exposes it on i386.
When optionally gathering operand info in regrename, we can overflow the
array in certain situations. This can occur when we have a situation
where a value is constructed in multiple
On 06/11/15 11:08, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> This one is a fix for something that could currently only affect c6x, but I
> have code that exposes it on i386.
>
> When optionally gathering operand info in regrename, we can overflow the
> array in certain situations. This can occur when we have a
On 11/06/2015 12:17 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On 06/11/15 11:08, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
This one is a fix for something that could currently only affect c6x, but I
have code that exposes it on i386.
When optionally gathering operand info in regrename, we can overflow the array in certain
On 11/06/2015 04:08 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
This one is a fix for something that could currently only affect c6x,
but I have code that exposes it on i386.
When optionally gathering operand info in regrename, we can overflow the
array in certain situations. This can occur when we have a
On 06/11/15 11:31, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 11/06/2015 12:17 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>> On 06/11/15 11:08, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>>> This one is a fix for something that could currently only affect c6x, but I
>>> have code that exposes it on i386.
>>>
>>> When optionally gathering
