Re: testsuite: Be more informative for ICEs
Hi! On 2021-12-13T14:12:26-0500, David Malcolm wrote: > On Mon, 2021-12-13 at 10:53 -0700, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote: >> On 12/10/21 3:42 PM, Thomas Schwinge wrote: >> > OK to push the attached "testsuite: Be more informative for ICEs"? >> >> Adding more detail here seems like a useful improvement to me. > > Agreed. Thanks, and given Jeff's approval, now pushed to master branch in commit 45b768cb80930c0beeb735727349c44ec66f7dd2 "testsuite: Be more informative for ICEs", see attached. > I don't think I can formally approve this patch, but it looks > like a big improvement to me, too. Well, for some meaning of "big improvement" anyway... ;-) But yes, certainly useful when you've (that is: I've) been comparing for a while DejaGnu '*.sum' files before/after a source code change, wondering why ICEs don't go away and only eventually realized that ICEs indeed do go away -- but just to be replaced with other ICEs. That's now becoming obvious. > Does it identify assertion failures, BTW? Some of the examples I have in the commit log actually are that, for example, for 'gcc/cp/constexpr.c': 6954gcc_checking_assert (ctx->quiet || errorcount); ... we get: [...]/source-gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-lambda26.C: In lambda function: [...]/source-gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-lambda26.C:14:35: internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_constant_expression, at cp/constexpr.c:6954 0x675604 cxx_eval_constant_expression [...]/source-gcc/gcc/cp/constexpr.c:6954 0xdfcfb5 cxx_eval_call_expression [...]/source-gcc/gcc/cp/constexpr.c:2398 [...] ..., and my simple patch just captures the 'internal compiler error: [...]' part and uses it as follows: -XFAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-lambda26.C -std=c++17 (internal compiler error) +XFAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-lambda26.C -std=c++17 (internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_constant_expression, at cp/constexpr.c:6954) Grüße Thomas - Siemens Electronic Design Automation GmbH; Anschrift: Arnulfstraße 201, 80634 München; Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung; Geschäftsführer: Thomas Heurung, Frank Thürauf; Sitz der Gesellschaft: München; Registergericht München, HRB 106955 >From 45b768cb80930c0beeb735727349c44ec66f7dd2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Schwinge Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 19:08:26 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] testsuite: Be more informative for ICEs For example, for the two (FAIL, XFAIL) 'gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-dg.exp:gcc-dg-test-1' cases: -FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_a.H -std=c++17 (internal compiler error) +FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_a.H -std=c++17 (internal compiler error: tree check: expected var_decl or function_decl or field_decl or type_decl or concept_decl or template_decl, have namespace_decl in get_merge_kind, at cp/module.cc:10072) -FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/clauses-1.f90 -O (internal compiler error) +FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/clauses-1.f90 -O (internal compiler error: Segmentation fault) -XFAIL: c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-decompose-ice-1.c (internal compiler error) +XFAIL: c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-decompose-ice-1.c (internal compiler error: in lower_omp_target, at omp-low.c:13147) -XFAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-lambda26.C -std=c++17 (internal compiler error) +XFAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-lambda26.C -std=c++17 (internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_constant_expression, at cp/constexpr.c:6954) That allows for more easily spotting when during development you're trading one ICE for another. gcc/testsuite/ * lib/fortran-torture.exp (fortran-torture-compile) (fortran-torture-execute): Be more informative for ICEs. * lib/gcc-defs.exp (${tool}_check_compile): Likewise. * lib/gcc-dg.exp (gcc-dg-test-1): Likewise. * lib/go-torture.exp (go-torture-compile, go-torture-execute): Likewise. --- gcc/testsuite/lib/fortran-torture.exp | 8 gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-defs.exp| 4 ++-- gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-dg.exp | 6 +++--- gcc/testsuite/lib/go-torture.exp | 8 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/fortran-torture.exp b/gcc/testsuite/lib/fortran-torture.exp index d6759aa0b4b..11d73d9f1f7 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/fortran-torture.exp +++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/fortran-torture.exp @@ -138,8 +138,8 @@ proc fortran-torture-compile { src option } { return } -if [string match "*internal compiler error*" $comp_output] then { - gfortran_fail $testcase "$option (internal compiler error)" +if [regexp -line -- "internal compiler error.*" $comp_output ice] then { + gfortran_fail $testcase "$option ($ice)" catch { remote_file build delete $output } return } @@ -263,8 +263,8 @@ proc fortran-torture-execute { src } { continue } - if [string match "*inter
Re: testsuite: Be more informative for ICEs
On 12/10/2021 3:42 PM, Thomas Schwinge wrote: Hi! OK to push the attached "testsuite: Be more informative for ICEs"? Grüße Thomas - Siemens Electronic Design Automation GmbH; Anschrift: Arnulfstraße 201, 80634 München; Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung; Geschäftsführer: Thomas Heurung, Frank Thürauf; Sitz der Gesellschaft: München; Registergericht München, HRB 106955 0001-testsuite-Be-more-informative-for-ICEs.patch From 5ffc2cfc9c6ec6ed0937311377118efd648f0297 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Schwinge Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 19:08:26 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] testsuite: Be more informative for ICEs For example, for the two (FAIL, XFAIL) 'gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-dg.exp:gcc-dg-test-1' cases: -FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_a.H -std=c++17 (internal compiler error) +FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_a.H -std=c++17 (internal compiler error: tree check: expected var_decl or function_decl or field_decl or type_decl or concept_decl or template_decl, have namespace_decl in get_merge_kind, at cp/module.cc:10072) -FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/clauses-1.f90 -O (internal compiler error) +FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/clauses-1.f90 -O (internal compiler error: Segmentation fault) -XFAIL: c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-decompose-ice-1.c (internal compiler error) +XFAIL: c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-decompose-ice-1.c (internal compiler error: in lower_omp_target, at omp-low.c:13147) -XFAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-lambda26.C -std=c++17 (internal compiler error) +XFAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-lambda26.C -std=c++17 (internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_constant_expression, at cp/constexpr.c:6954) That allows for more easily spotting when during development you're trading one ICE for another. gcc/testsuite/ * lib/fortran-torture.exp (fortran-torture-compile) (fortran-torture-execute): Be more informative for ICEs. * lib/gcc-defs.exp (${tool}_check_compile): Likewise. * lib/gcc-dg.exp (gcc-dg-test-1): Likewise. * lib/go-torture.exp (go-torture-compile, go-torture-execute): Likewise. OK. jeff
Re: testsuite: Be more informative for ICEs
On Mon, 2021-12-13 at 10:53 -0700, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote: > On 12/10/21 3:42 PM, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > Hi! > > > > OK to push the attached "testsuite: Be more informative for ICEs"? > > Adding more detail here seems like a useful improvement to me. > > Martin Agreed. I don't think I can formally approve this patch, but it looks like a big improvement to me, too. Does it identify assertion failures, BTW? Dave
Re: testsuite: Be more informative for ICEs
On 12/10/21 3:42 PM, Thomas Schwinge wrote: Hi! OK to push the attached "testsuite: Be more informative for ICEs"? Adding more detail here seems like a useful improvement to me. Martin Grüße Thomas - Siemens Electronic Design Automation GmbH; Anschrift: Arnulfstraße 201, 80634 München; Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung; Geschäftsführer: Thomas Heurung, Frank Thürauf; Sitz der Gesellschaft: München; Registergericht München, HRB 106955 0001-testsuite-Be-more-informative-for-ICEs.patch From 5ffc2cfc9c6ec6ed0937311377118efd648f0297 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Schwinge Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 19:08:26 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] testsuite: Be more informative for ICEs For example, for the two (FAIL, XFAIL) 'gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-dg.exp:gcc-dg-test-1' cases: -FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_a.H -std=c++17 (internal compiler error) +FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_a.H -std=c++17 (internal compiler error: tree check: expected var_decl or function_decl or field_decl or type_decl or concept_decl or template_decl, have namespace_decl in get_merge_kind, at cp/module.cc:10072) -FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/clauses-1.f90 -O (internal compiler error) +FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/clauses-1.f90 -O (internal compiler error: Segmentation fault) -XFAIL: c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-decompose-ice-1.c (internal compiler error) +XFAIL: c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-decompose-ice-1.c (internal compiler error: in lower_omp_target, at omp-low.c:13147) -XFAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-lambda26.C -std=c++17 (internal compiler error) +XFAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-lambda26.C -std=c++17 (internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_constant_expression, at cp/constexpr.c:6954) That allows for more easily spotting when during development you're trading one ICE for another. gcc/testsuite/ * lib/fortran-torture.exp (fortran-torture-compile) (fortran-torture-execute): Be more informative for ICEs. * lib/gcc-defs.exp (${tool}_check_compile): Likewise. * lib/gcc-dg.exp (gcc-dg-test-1): Likewise. * lib/go-torture.exp (go-torture-compile, go-torture-execute): Likewise. --- gcc/testsuite/lib/fortran-torture.exp | 8 gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-defs.exp| 4 ++-- gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-dg.exp | 6 +++--- gcc/testsuite/lib/go-torture.exp | 8 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/fortran-torture.exp b/gcc/testsuite/lib/fortran-torture.exp index d6759aa0b4b..11d73d9f1f7 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/fortran-torture.exp +++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/fortran-torture.exp @@ -138,8 +138,8 @@ proc fortran-torture-compile { src option } { return } -if [string match "*internal compiler error*" $comp_output] then { - gfortran_fail $testcase "$option (internal compiler error)" +if [regexp -line -- "internal compiler error.*" $comp_output ice] then { + gfortran_fail $testcase "$option ($ice)" catch { remote_file build delete $output } return } @@ -263,8 +263,8 @@ proc fortran-torture-execute { src } { continue } - if [string match "*internal compiler error*" $comp_output] then { - gfortran_fail $testcase "$option (internal compiler error)" + if [regexp -line -- "internal compiler error.*" $comp_output ice] then { + gfortran_fail $testcase "$option ($ice)" catch { remote_file build delete $executable } continue } diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-defs.exp b/gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-defs.exp index d17308d0f86..66df4e1c6aa 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-defs.exp +++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-defs.exp @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ proc ${tool}_check_compile {testcase option objname gcc_output} { return 0 } -if [string match "*internal compiler error*" $gcc_output] then { - ${tool}_fail $testcase "$option (internal compiler error)" +if [regexp -line -- "internal compiler error.*" $gcc_output ice] then { + ${tool}_fail $testcase "$option ($ice)" return 0 } diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-dg.exp b/gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-dg.exp index 78a6c3651ef..464059608b8 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-dg.exp +++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-dg.exp @@ -315,13 +315,13 @@ proc gcc-dg-test-1 { target_compile prog do_what extra_tool_flags } { # to avoid a second failure for excess errors. # "Error reporting routines re-entered" ICE says "Internal" rather than # "internal", so match that too. -if [string match {*[Ii]nternal compiler error*} $comp_output] { +if [regexp -line -- {[Ii]nternal compiler error.*} $comp_output ice] { upvar 2 name name if { $expect_ice == 0 } { -
testsuite: Be more informative for ICEs
Hi! OK to push the attached "testsuite: Be more informative for ICEs"? Grüße Thomas - Siemens Electronic Design Automation GmbH; Anschrift: Arnulfstraße 201, 80634 München; Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung; Geschäftsführer: Thomas Heurung, Frank Thürauf; Sitz der Gesellschaft: München; Registergericht München, HRB 106955 >From 5ffc2cfc9c6ec6ed0937311377118efd648f0297 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Schwinge Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 19:08:26 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] testsuite: Be more informative for ICEs For example, for the two (FAIL, XFAIL) 'gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-dg.exp:gcc-dg-test-1' cases: -FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_a.H -std=c++17 (internal compiler error) +FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_a.H -std=c++17 (internal compiler error: tree check: expected var_decl or function_decl or field_decl or type_decl or concept_decl or template_decl, have namespace_decl in get_merge_kind, at cp/module.cc:10072) -FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/clauses-1.f90 -O (internal compiler error) +FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/clauses-1.f90 -O (internal compiler error: Segmentation fault) -XFAIL: c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-decompose-ice-1.c (internal compiler error) +XFAIL: c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-decompose-ice-1.c (internal compiler error: in lower_omp_target, at omp-low.c:13147) -XFAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-lambda26.C -std=c++17 (internal compiler error) +XFAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-lambda26.C -std=c++17 (internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_constant_expression, at cp/constexpr.c:6954) That allows for more easily spotting when during development you're trading one ICE for another. gcc/testsuite/ * lib/fortran-torture.exp (fortran-torture-compile) (fortran-torture-execute): Be more informative for ICEs. * lib/gcc-defs.exp (${tool}_check_compile): Likewise. * lib/gcc-dg.exp (gcc-dg-test-1): Likewise. * lib/go-torture.exp (go-torture-compile, go-torture-execute): Likewise. --- gcc/testsuite/lib/fortran-torture.exp | 8 gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-defs.exp| 4 ++-- gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-dg.exp | 6 +++--- gcc/testsuite/lib/go-torture.exp | 8 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/fortran-torture.exp b/gcc/testsuite/lib/fortran-torture.exp index d6759aa0b4b..11d73d9f1f7 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/fortran-torture.exp +++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/fortran-torture.exp @@ -138,8 +138,8 @@ proc fortran-torture-compile { src option } { return } -if [string match "*internal compiler error*" $comp_output] then { - gfortran_fail $testcase "$option (internal compiler error)" +if [regexp -line -- "internal compiler error.*" $comp_output ice] then { + gfortran_fail $testcase "$option ($ice)" catch { remote_file build delete $output } return } @@ -263,8 +263,8 @@ proc fortran-torture-execute { src } { continue } - if [string match "*internal compiler error*" $comp_output] then { - gfortran_fail $testcase "$option (internal compiler error)" + if [regexp -line -- "internal compiler error.*" $comp_output ice] then { + gfortran_fail $testcase "$option ($ice)" catch { remote_file build delete $executable } continue } diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-defs.exp b/gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-defs.exp index d17308d0f86..66df4e1c6aa 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-defs.exp +++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-defs.exp @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ proc ${tool}_check_compile {testcase option objname gcc_output} { return 0 } -if [string match "*internal compiler error*" $gcc_output] then { - ${tool}_fail $testcase "$option (internal compiler error)" +if [regexp -line -- "internal compiler error.*" $gcc_output ice] then { + ${tool}_fail $testcase "$option ($ice)" return 0 } diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-dg.exp b/gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-dg.exp index 78a6c3651ef..464059608b8 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-dg.exp +++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-dg.exp @@ -315,13 +315,13 @@ proc gcc-dg-test-1 { target_compile prog do_what extra_tool_flags } { # to avoid a second failure for excess errors. # "Error reporting routines re-entered" ICE says "Internal" rather than # "internal", so match that too. -if [string match {*[Ii]nternal compiler error*} $comp_output] { +if [regexp -line -- {[Ii]nternal compiler error.*} $comp_output ice] { upvar 2 name name if { $expect_ice == 0 } { - fail "$name (internal compiler error)" + fail "$name ($ice)" } else { # We expected an ICE and we got it. - xfail "$name (internal compiler error)" + xfail "$name ($ice)" # Prune the ICE from the output. set comp_output [prune_ices $comp_output] } diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/go-torture.exp b/gcc/testsuite