On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net wrote:
The attached patch does two things for df_get_call_refs():
How did you test this patch?
Normally, a patch submission comes with text like, Bootstrapped
tested on ..., no regressions.. Also, you chould write a ChangeLog
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 06:20:04AM +0300, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
The attached patch does two things for df_get_call_refs():
* First it uses HARD_REG_SETs for defs_generated and
regs_invalidated_by_call, instead of bitmaps. Replacing in total
more than 400K calls (for my testcase) to
On 07/08/2011 05:51 AM, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
+ /* first write DF_REF_BASE */
This is not necessary. These uses are written to use_vec, while the
uses from REG_EQUIV and REG_EQUAL are written to eq_use_vec (see
df_ref_create_structure).
Also, anyway this wouldn't work because
df-scan.c has this code to deal with group sets:
/* It is legal to have a set destination be a parallel. */
if (GET_CODE (dst) == PARALLEL)
{
int i;
for (i = XVECLEN (dst, 0) - 1; i = 0; i--)
{
rtx temp = XVECEXP (dst, 0, i);
if (GET_CODE (temp)
On 07.07.2011 20:18, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
On 07/01/2011 10:50 AM, Andrey Belevantsev wrote:
On 26.05.2011 17:32, Andrey Belevantsev wrote:
On 25.05.2011 19:31, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 05/25/2011 03:29 PM, Andrey Belevantsev wrote:
I think the hook is a better idea than the attribute
On 07/07/11 21:08, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Richard Earnshaw rearn...@arm.com writes:
On 07/07/11 15:34, Richard Sandiford wrote:
It seems a shame to have both (return) and (simple_return). You said
that we need the distinction in order to cope with targets like ARM,
whose (return)
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011, Martin Jambor wrote:
Hi,
in order to better analyze what SRA is or is not doing, it is
sometimes advantageous to have in the dump information that a
structure was not subject to total scalarization because it was too
big - if we have detailed dumping on, that is.
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011, Sebastian Pop wrote:
Hi,
First there are two cleanup patches independent of the fix:
Start counting nesting level from 0.
Do not compute twice type, lb, and ub.
Then the patch that fixes PR47654:
Fix PR47654: Compute LB and UB of a CLAST expression.
One
Bernd Schmidt ber...@codesourcery.com writes:
On 07/05/11 21:25, Richard Sandiford wrote:
A C bootstrap only should be fine of course, since the code isn't
going to be run.)
+ hwloop_info loops = NULL;
Unnecessary initialisation (or at least, it should be).
? The value is used inside
This XFAILs the loop interchange testcases that are now confused
by better PRE.
Tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2011-07-08 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR tree-optimization/49662
* gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-14.c: XFAIL.
*
Hello,
This patch simply removes legacy call_expr_arg and call_expr_argp
declarations since these functions no longer have a defined body. Use
CALL_EXPR_ARG and CALL_EXPR_ARGP macros instead.
Build fine and no regression on x86_64.
2011-07-08 Romain Geissler romain.geiss...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Romain Geissler
romain.geiss...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
This patch simply removes legacy call_expr_arg and call_expr_argp
declarations since these functions no longer have a defined body. Use
CALL_EXPR_ARG and CALL_EXPR_ARGP macros instead.
Build fine and no
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 06:20:04AM +0300, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
The attached patch does two things for df_get_call_refs():
* First it uses HARD_REG_SETs for defs_generated and
regs_invalidated_by_call, instead of bitmaps. Replacing in total
more
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:03 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is the updated patch. I will wait for Uros's comments.
I attached the wrong file. Here is the updated patch.
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/bitfield3.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/bitfield3.C
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
//
2011/7/8 Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello,
This patch - first of series - adds to fold and some helper routines support
for one-bit precision bitwise folding and detection.
This patch is necessary for
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, Tom G. Christensen wrote:
Latest results for 4.4.x.
Thanks, Tom.
Gerald
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello,
This patch - third of series - fixes vrp to handle bitwise one-bit
precision typed operations.
And it introduces a second - limitted to non-switch-statement range - vrp
pass.
Err - please split this patch. I
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote
2011/7/8 Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello,
This patch - first of series - adds to fold and some helper routines support
for
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
Looks fine to me, but please allow 24 hours for the web maintainers to
comment if they wish.
Thanks, this looks good.
Gerald
CCed Eric and Bernd.
Denis Chertykov wrote:
Did you decide about the fix for PR46779?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg00810.html
Is it ok to commit?
I forgot about testsuite regressions for this patch.
Denis.
There were no new regressions:
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net wrote:
Hello list,
The attached patch does two things for df_get_call_refs():
* First it uses HARD_REG_SETs for defs_generated and
regs_invalidated_by_call, instead of bitmaps.
2011/7/8 Georg-Johann Lay a...@gjlay.de:
CCed Eric and Bernd.
Denis Chertykov wrote:
Did you decide about the fix for PR46779?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg00810.html
Is it ok to commit?
I forgot about testsuite regressions for this patch.
Denis.
There were no new
As described in the PR, unless the assembler supports -relax, SPARC gcc
can emit sethi+jmp instead of just call, so the pattern has to be more
specific.
This patch implements this, also having to account for the fact that
subexpressions in Tcl regexps double the match count.
Tested with the
Eric, Jakub,
Thanks for your inputs, I've applied them. Updated patch is attached.
So, one more time:
ChangeLog entry:
2011-07-06 Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@intel.com
PR middle-end/49519
* calls.c (mem_overlaps_already_clobbered_arg_p): Additional
check if address is
The next patch in the line of toplevel libgcc moves proved to be
completely trivial: fixed-bit.[ch] is moved over with corresponding
include and Makefile changes.
Tested with a C-only --enable-fixed-point non-bootstrap build/test on
mips-sgi-irix6.5. Without --enable-fixed-point, fixed-point
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011, Michael Matz wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
+ tree rhs1 = gimple_assign_rhs1 (stmt);
+ gimple def_stmt = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (rhs1);
+ value_range_t *final, *inner;
+
+ /* Obtain final and inner value-ranges for a conversion
+
Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org writes:
df-scan.c has this code to deal with group sets:
/* It is legal to have a set destination be a parallel. */
if (GET_CODE (dst) == PARALLEL)
{
int i;
for (i = XVECLEN (dst, 0) - 1; i = 0; i--)
{
rtx temp =
2011/7/8 Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
2011/7/7 Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org:
On 07/07/2011 06:07 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
+ /* We redo folding here one time for allowing to inspect more
+ complex
On 07/08/2011 12:33 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
The next patch in the line of toplevel libgcc moves proved to be
completely trivial: fixed-bit.[ch] is moved over with corresponding
include and Makefile changes.
Tested with a C-only --enable-fixed-point non-bootstrap build/test on
mips-sgi-irix6.5.
2011/7/8 Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
2011/7/7 Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org:
On 07/07/2011 06:07 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
+ /* We redo folding here one time for allowing to inspect more
+ complex
So, one more time:
You didn't really need to re-submit but...
ChangeLog entry:
2011-07-06 Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@intel.com
PR middle-end/49519
* calls.c (mem_overlaps_already_clobbered_arg_p): Additional
check if address is stored in register. If so - give
Hi Doug,
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011, Douglas Rupp wrote:
An update to the IA-32/x86-64 section seems the right place. I confess
to being ignorant about how to update this html page. Please advise.
at http://gcc.gnu.org/cvs.html I tried to summarize things a bit.
If you have any questions, don't
Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org writes:
Patch is okay if you take care of committing both, but please wait 48 hours
or so, and please post the updated patch with config/dfp-bit.c moved to
dfp-bit.c (config/t-dfprules should stay there).
Here's the revised version. Bootstrapped without
2011/7/8 Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello,
This patch - second of series - adds boolification of comparisions in
gimplifier. For this
casts from/to boolean are marked as not-useless. And in
On 07/08/2011 01:31 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
And another easy one: moving libgcov over to libgcc.
Bootstrapped without regressions on i386-pc-solaris2.11 and
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Ok for mainline?
After this one, and once the problems with the unwinder move are sorted
out, I've got a few
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
2011/7/8 Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello,
This patch - second of series - adds boolification of comparisions in
gimplifier.
Denis Chertykov wrote:
2011/7/8 Georg-Johann Lay a...@gjlay.de:
CCed Eric and Bernd.
Denis Chertykov wrote:
Did you decide about the fix for PR46779?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg00810.html
Is it ok to commit?
I forgot about testsuite regressions for this patch.
Denis.
Hi,
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
It should be indeed safe with the current handling of conversions, but
better be safe. So, like the following?
No. The point is that you can't compare the bounds that VRP computes with
each other when the outcome affects correctness. Think
Hi!
As mentioned in the PR, IMNSHO the rs6000 vector_select_* patterns
are invalid RTL, they compare a vector register in some vector mode
to const0_rtx instead of corresponding vector zero constant.
The Comparison Operations section of RTL docs says:
The mode of the comparison is determined by
On 07/07/11 13:37, Richard Guenther wrote:
I'll cook up a quick patch for VRP.
Like the attached. I'll finish and properly test it.
Your patch appears to do the wrong thing for this test case:
int
foo (int a, short b, short c)
{
int bc = b * c;
return a + (short)bc;
}
With your patch,
Currently the gcc.dg/20020312-2.c testcase fails on darwin11 with...
FAIL: gcc.dg/20020312-2.c (test for excess errors)
at -m32 due to the fact that the absolute addressing (-mdynamic-no-pic) is not
allowed with the
default -pie linkage of darwin11 and later which produces a warning. The
On 07/08/2011 12:43 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
The docs also say that the first expr_list can be null:
If @var{lval} is a @code{parallel}, it is used to represent the case of
a function returning a structure in multiple registers. Each element
of the @code{parallel} is an
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 07/08/2011 12:43 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
The docs also say that the first expr_list can be null:
If @var{lval} is a @code{parallel}, it is used to represent the case of
a function returning a structure in multiple registers. Each element
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 3:58 AM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
So, one more time:
You didn't really need to re-submit but...
ChangeLog entry:
2011-07-06 Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@intel.com
PR middle-end/49519
* calls.c
Currently, gcc.dg/darwin-segaddr.c fails its execution test at both -m32
and -m64 on darwin11. This is due to the default -pie linkage on darwin11
allowing
ASLR to randomize the segaddr on each individual execution of the resulting
binary. The
attached patch eliminates this failure by passing
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revisionrevision=176041
Committed this patchlet as pre-approved by Denis.
Johann
* config/avr/avr.c (output_reload_insisf): Use 'REG_Z+1' instead
of magic '31'.
--- trunk/gcc/config/avr/avr.c 2011/07/08 13:03:38 176040
+++
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Andrew Stubbs a...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On 07/07/11 13:37, Richard Guenther wrote:
I'll cook up a quick patch for VRP.
Like the attached. I'll finish and properly test it.
Your patch appears to do the wrong thing for this test case:
int
foo (int a,
On 07/08/2011 03:05 PM, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
Paolo, something else, in df_mark_reg() is it ever possible for regno to
be = FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER? An assert I've put doesn't trigger for my
simple test :-)
From reading the docs of EH_RETURN_STACKADJ_RTX and EH_RETURN_HANDLER_RTX,
it
Hello,
This patch factors out the label truth_andor in fold_binary_loc into a
separate function.
2011-07-08 Kai Tietz kti...@redhat.com
* fold-const.c (fold_truth_andor): Factored out truth_andor
label from fold_binary as function.
(fold_binary_loc): Replace
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Michael Matz wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
It should be indeed safe with the current handling of conversions, but
better be safe. So, like the following?
No. The point is that you can't compare the bounds that VRP computes with
each
Thanks Paolo for the detailed explanation!
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
That said, changing exit_block_uses and entry_block_defs to HARD_REG_SET would
be a nice cleanup, but it would also touch target code due to
targetm.extra_live_on_entry (entry_block_defs);
I've already
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
Thanks, here is what I've committed after bootstrapping/regtesting
again on x86_64-linux and i686-linux.
Thanks Jakub. Probably worth an entry in changes.html.
Yes, please. :-)
Gerald
On 07/07/11 22:08, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Sure, I understand that returns does more than return on ARM.
What I meant was: we'd normally want that other stuff to be
expressed in rtl alongside the (return) rtx. E.g. something like:
(parallel
[(return)
(set (reg r4) (mem (plus
On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 17:30 +0200, Michael Matz wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
I still do not like the implementation of yet another CSE machinery
given that we already have two.
From reading it it really seems to be a normal block-local CSE, without
anything
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011, Richard Henderson wrote:
alpha-elf: Disable stabs debugging, and the mips sdb extensions.
In particular, the mips sdb extensions accidentally implied the
irix dwarf2 extensions and restrictions. Disable stabs because
it's almost certainly untested
On 07/08/2011 11:05 AM, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 06:20:04AM +0300, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
The attached patch does two things for df_get_call_refs():
* First it uses HARD_REG_SETs for defs_generated and
Now that we have constexpr constructors, having a non-trivial
constructor no longer precludes a variable being TREE_READONLY. The
front end will clear TREE_READONLY if the variable requires non-constant
initialization.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
commit
There are tests in suite that set -fschedule-insns[2] and FAIL because of
warning: instruction scheduling not supported on this target machine
[enabled by default]
As there is no individual switch do disable the warning, the patch
disables some test cases so reduce the overall noise of false
Rainer Orth r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de writes:
Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com writes:
Rainer Orth r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de writes:
All bootstraps have completed without regressions, so I've installed the
patch as is, after verifying that the libgo parts aren't present in the
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Rainer Orth wrote:
And another easy one: moving libgcov over to libgcc.
Do you have any specific plans regarding gcov-io.c and gcov-io.h? Because
they are genuinely used on both the host and the target they are a
trickier case; I wonder if they should end up in their own
2011/7/8 Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
2011/7/7 Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org:
On 07/07/2011 06:07 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
+ /* We redo folding here one time for allowing to inspect more
+ complex
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 10:22:16AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-rom.C
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+// PR c++/49673: check that test_data goes into .rodata
+// { dg-options -std=c++0x }
+// { dg-final { scan-assembler rodata } }
That will match
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
2011/7/8 Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
2011/7/7 Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org:
On 07/07/2011 06:07 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
+ /* We
2011/7/8 Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
2011/7/8 Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
2011/7/7 Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org:
These tests are too big for AVR: .text (128 KiB) overflows and ld
complains.
Ok to commit?
Johann
* gcc.dg/compat/struct-by-value-16_main.c: Skip AVR.
* gcc.dg/compat/struct-by-value-17_main.c: Skip AVR.
* gcc.dg/compat/struct-by-value-18_main.c: Skip AVR.
*
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot. (If you have
any questions, send them to coordina...@translationproject.org.)
A new POT file for textual domain 'cpplib' has been made available
to the language teams for translation. It is archived as:
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi!
As mentioned in the PR, IMNSHO the rs6000 vector_select_* patterns
are invalid RTL, they compare a vector register in some vector mode
to const0_rtx instead of corresponding vector zero constant.
The Comparison
On 11-07-08 3:25 AM, Andrey Belevantsev wrote:
On 07.07.2011 20:18, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
The changes in sel-sched.c is ok for me. i386.md changes look ok for
me too
but you should ask a x86 maintainer to get an approval for the change.
I think you should describe the attribute in the
Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com writes:
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Rainer Orth wrote:
And another easy one: moving libgcov over to libgcc.
Do you have any specific plans regarding gcov-io.c and gcov-io.h? Because
None so far: the issues outlined in the libgcov submission are currently
Ian,
I committed the libgo patch to the upstream repository.
I completely missed that: at least in https://go.googlecode.com/hg/
libtool.m4 isn't present.
The immediate upstream project for libgo is
https://gofrontend.googlecode.com/hg/ . Most of the files in the libgo
directory in that
2011/7/8 Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
Index: gcc-head/gcc/tree-vrp.c
@@ -2232,6 +2235,7 @@ extract_range_from_binary_expr (value_ra
some cases. */
if (code != BIT_AND_EXPR
code !=
Hi, there was only one patch committed to the graphite branch that
matters to also have in trunk:
Remove continue from loop, add one more assert.
The other patches are squashed into the two commits:
Only update ChangeLog.graphite.
these are related to the graphite-opencl infrastructure and
---
gcc/ChangeLog.graphite | 22 ++
1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog.graphite b/gcc/ChangeLog.graphite
index 628fb7e..b2c1b1c 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog.graphite
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog.graphite
@@ -1,3 +1,25 @@
+2011-05-26 Alexey
---
gcc/ChangeLog.graphite | 27 +++
1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog.graphite b/gcc/ChangeLog.graphite
index c3fd009..2a14fc4 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog.graphite
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog.graphite
@@ -1,3 +1,30 @@
+2011-05-24
2011-07-08 Sebastian Pop sebastian@amd.com
* graphite-dependences.c (build_alias_set_powerset): Remove
continue from loop, add one more assert.
---
gcc/ChangeLog |5 +
gcc/ChangeLog.graphite |5 +
gcc/graphite-dependences.c | 15
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot. (If you have
any questions, send them to coordina...@translationproject.org.)
A new POT file for textual domain 'gcc' has been made available
to the language teams for translation. It is archived as:
Hello,
This is the reworked patch, It fixes vrp to handle bitwise one-bit
precision typed operations
and to handle some type hoisting cases, Some cases can't be handled as
long as vrp doesn't
allows to insert new statements in folding pass.
To have in first pass better match, VRP uses for
Hi,
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Kai Tietz wrote:
This is the reworked patch, It fixes vrp to handle bitwise one-bit
precision typed operations and to handle some type hoisting cases, Some
cases can't be handled as long as vrp doesn't allows to insert new
statements in folding pass. To have in
2011/7/8 Michael Matz m...@suse.de:
Hi,
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Kai Tietz wrote:
This is the reworked patch, It fixes vrp to handle bitwise one-bit
precision typed operations and to handle some type hoisting cases, Some
cases can't be handled as long as vrp doesn't allows to insert new
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 06:03:07PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi,
patch is long, so let me review it in more passes.
Fair enough.
2011-06-22 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz
* ipa-prop.h: Include alloc-pool.h.
(ipa_lattice_type): Removed.
(ipcp_value_source):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As detailed in the PR, improvements to jump threading caused the
relatively simple guard predicates in this testcase to become
significantly more complex. The predicate complexity is enough to
confuse the predicate-aware pruning of bogus
On 07/08/2011 10:35 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
That will match only on ELF and perhaps a few other targets, but I'm certain
many targets put read-only data elsewhere. I'd just guard this
with a few most common target triplets that are known to use .rodata
section.
Done, thanks. I've also
The testcase is kind of bogus, but we ought to be more robust.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applied to trunk.
commit f6ac9e35ced48b4e646f1cb0a8b5cab869ad91f6
Author: Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jul 8 13:05:01 2011 -0400
PR c++/45603
* decl.c (expand_static_init): Don't
Steve,
I just tried builds on ia64 linux and HP-UX and both builds failed. I
am re-trying the HP-UX build with --with-system-libunwind to see if that
changes things but that should be the default on IA64 HP-UX.
On Linux (debian) the build stopped with:
Steve,
It looks like the GCC build is trying to compile unwind-ia64.c on IA64
HP-UX even though it should not use or need this file. Using
--with-system-libunwind doesn't seem to help. I am not sure where this
should be handled under the new setup. Previously config.gcc would
either
/* Structure holding data required to describe a pass-through jump
function. */
struct GTY(()) ipa_pass_through_data
{
/* If an operation is to be performed on the original parameter, this
is the
second (constant) operand. */
tree operand;
/* Number of
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the Spanish team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/es.po
(This file, 'gcc-4.6.1.es.po', has
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 15:48, Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de wrote:
I have now committed the patch with only the nits fixed (Rev.175966). But
given that the coarray support - especially with regards to the library - is
still in a flux, we can still change everything, including the ABI of the
Hi!
E.g. on
extern void d (int);
void __attribute__((noinline, noclone))
self (int i)
{
if (i == 200)
self (i + 1);
else
d (i + 2);
}
this patch saves two bytes in the location description of the call site
value where we have a SImode comparison with 200, by
As suggested in c++/49353, this patch stops copying linkage flags to
thunks in function_and_variable_visibility, replacing that with just
asserts to make sure that the front end is setting things up properly.
To make the front end's job easier, I've added
cgraph_add_to_same_comdat_group so
The C++ sequence point rules for compound assignment (+= and such) are
slightly different from those for C: the value of the LHS is not loaded
until after the RHS value (and LHS location) are evaluated. Since we
don't have tree codes for compound assignment, I need to handle this in
C++ by
This appears to do the right thing. I didn't bother with
markers for unwind info, since pdp11 is limited to a.out
and thus will never use dwarf2.
There are improvements that could be made. I added some
comments to that effect but did not otherwise change the
code generation.
Note that the
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 05:49:36PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
The C++ sequence point rules for compound assignment (+= and such)
are slightly different from those for C: the value of the LHS is not
loaded until after the RHS value (and LHS location) are evaluated.
Since we don't have tree
As suggested in c++/49353, this patch stops copying linkage flags to
thunks in function_and_variable_visibility, replacing that with just
asserts to make sure that the front end is setting things up properly.
To make the front end's job easier, I've added
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, Tom G. Christensen wrote:
Latest results for 4.5.x
Thanks, Tom, this is on now.
Gerald
Both resulting from the discussion in PR49680, neither
of which (probably) fix the original reported problem.
Tested via cross-compile to mips-sgi-irix6.5. Committed.
r~
Richard Henderson (2):
dwarf2cfi: Insert notes correctly wrt tablejumps.
dwarf2cfi: Flush queued saves at the end of
There's little point at holding onto these saves indefinitely.
PR bootstrap/49680
* dwarf2cfi.c (create_cfi_notes): Flush queued saves at the
end of the prologue.
---
gcc/ChangeLog |4
gcc/dwarf2cfi.c |7 +++
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
PR bootstrap/49680
* dwarf2cfi.c (dwarf2out_frame_debug): Insert cfi notes after
any tablejump vector.
---
gcc/ChangeLog |6 ++
gcc/dwarf2cfi.c | 12 ++--
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 07/08/2011 05:51 AM, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
+ /* first write DF_REF_BASE */
This is not necessary. These uses are written to use_vec, while the uses
from REG_EQUIV and REG_EQUAL are written to eq_use_vec (see
df_ref_create_structure).
The fix of streaming DECL_CHAIN in pph for VAR_DECL and FUNCTION_DECL was
introduced to fix member not found errors for structs (and we don't have any
tests with unions (we probably should...), but I believe they work the same).
The fix was too general and was actually interfering with
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
