On 1 April 2012 23:55, David Edelsohn dje@gmail.com wrote:
If there are no further comments I am inclined to commit this
patch early next week (possibly causing quite some fallout ...).
I am glad there was not more fallout. Unfortunately powerpc-aix was
not so lucky:
On Mar 30, 2012, at 2:39 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 30/03/2012 12:22, Tristan Gingold ha scritto:
On Mar 27, 2012, at 10:38 AM, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:01, Tristan Gingold ging...@adacore.com wrote:
Hi,
this patch fixes this issue. Is it OK ?
Ok.
On Mar 30, 2012, at 5:46 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Tristan Gingold ging...@adacore.com writes:
2012-03-30 Tristan Gingold ging...@adacore.com
* stack-limit.c: Includes ansidecl.h.
(stack_limit_increase): Add ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED
This is OK.
Thanks, committed.
Tristan.
On Mar 30, 2012, at 7:44 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 03/20/2012 05:41 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
2012-03-20 Tristan Gingold ging...@adacore.com
* ggc-page.c (PAGE_L1_SIZE, PAGE_L2_SIZE, LOOKUP_L1, LOOKUP_L2)
(ggc_allocated_p, lookup_page_table_entry, set_page_table_entry)
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hello!
Attached patch restores alpha bootstrap.
2012-03-31 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
Partially revert:
2012-03-29 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
* rtl.h (extended_count): Remove.
* combine.c
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
2012-03-31 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
Partially revert:
2012-03-29 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
* rtl.h (extended_count): Remove.
* combine.c (extended_count): Remove.
On Mon, 2 Apr 2012, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
2012-03-31 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
Partially revert:
2012-03-29 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
* rtl.h (extended_count): Remove.
This patch implements the new Valid_Scalars attribute (that tests all
scalar parts of an object including discriminabnts and subcomponents,
to ensure they are valid. All cases are handled (including multi-
dimensional arrays) except for variant records which will be
implemented in a separate step.
Style checks must apply to suprogram instantiations, even though they are
rewritten by means of a wrapper package and appear not to come from source.
Missing overriding indicators (for primitives of untagged types) and casing
anomalies in the text of the instance are now diagnosed.
the command
This patch corrects the insertion of the compiler-generated routine which
encapsulates the behavior of post conditions. When a formal parameter is of a
packed array type, the compiler creates several helper subtypes and inserts
them at the top of the related subprogram declaration list. Since the
When GNAT.Expect reaches the end of its input, it does not properly
closes the input file descriptor, thus resulting in a memory leak.
This was properly handles when calling Get_Process_Output, but not
when writing the loop manually
---
-- The following program had errors reported by valgrind
This fixes PR52803 - when we do not enter the pass_loop2 sub-pass
queue nothing will execute pass_rtl_loop_done. But we still need
to destroy loops, which are preserved until after pass_loop2.
Doing so in the gate of pass_loop2 is ugly, but destroyed
properties are ignored if the gate returns
The definition of a User-defined operator carries quotes around the name, as
do operators invoked in functional notation. The parser handles these as strings
and their source position is that of the opening quote. This is awkward for
GPS navigation, where we want the highlight of occurrences of
Units that are only withed from generic instantiation are now put in the
ALI file as Z lines instead of W lines.
There is no impact on GNAT tools. This is for the benefit of gprbuild.
The test for this is to have a unit A instantiating a generic unit B,
the body of which import a package C. In tha
You should be able to use fold_unary instead of fold_build1.
make_signed_type should also not be used, but
build_nonstandard_integer_type (or even better, get an integer mode of the
same size of the float mode and then use type_for_mode).
Using the mode size wouldn't work directly for XFmode
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
You should be able to use fold_unary instead of fold_build1.
make_signed_type should also not be used, but
build_nonstandard_integer_type (or even better, get an integer mode of the
same size of the float mode and then
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Martin Jambor wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:03:59AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012, Martin Jambor wrote:
Hi,
when testing a patch of mine on sparc64-linux, I came across an Ada
bootstrap failure due to a structure DECL which
This fixes PR52800.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Richard.
2012-04-02 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR rtl-optimization/52800
* cprop.c (execute_rtl_cprop): Call cleanup_cfg with
CLEANUP_CFG_CHANGED.
Index: gcc/cprop.c
Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com writes:
Therefore, an RFA for the attached patch. Bootstrappedtested on
powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK?
Unfortunately, this patch completely broke libjava testing on
i386-pc-solaris2* and x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu: all execution tests fail
with a SEGV:
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Rainer Orth r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de
wrote:
Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com writes:
Therefore, an RFA for the attached patch. Bootstrappedtested on
powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK?
Unfortunately, this patch completely broke libjava testing on
After going through a gazillion of candidate fixes for PR52756, a
case where jump threading destroys loops in a non-recoverable way,
I settled with the following. The issue is that we thread both
the loop latch and the loop entry edge but the code is not prepared
for that. Another possible fix
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 1:03 AM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
+struct __processor_model
+{
+ /* Vendor. */
+ unsigned int __cpu_is_amd : 1;
+ unsigned int
This fixes PR52803 - when we do not enter the pass_loop2 sub-pass
queue nothing will execute pass_rtl_loop_done. But we still need
to destroy loops, which are preserved until after pass_loop2.
Doing so in the gate of pass_loop2 is ugly, but destroyed
properties are ignored if the gate
On 2/04/2012, at 3:23 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
As is, it appears this patch did not see much testing, I'm pretty sure it
breaks building shared libraries and PIE executable for Linux.
I do not expect any changes in compiler behavior for non Android
targets. I bootstrapped and checked
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012, Eric Botcazou wrote:
May I apply the patch I posted? It boostrapped/regtested fine on
x86-64/Linux.
Yes.
Thanks. Unfortunately, while this was the last identified problem on x86,
another issue is visible on x86-64 as a miscompilation of XML/Ada at -O0.
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/04/2012, at 3:23 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
As is, it appears this patch did not see much testing, I'm pretty sure it
breaks building shared libraries and PIE executable for Linux.
I do not expect any changes in
On Mon, 2 Apr 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
After going through a gazillion of candidate fixes for PR52756, a
case where jump threading destroys loops in a non-recoverable way,
I settled with the following. The issue is that we thread both
the loop latch and the loop entry edge but the
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
After going through a gazillion of candidate fixes for PR52756, a
case where jump threading destroys loops in a non-recoverable way,
I settled with the following. The issue is that we thread both
the loop latch and the
On Mon, 2 Apr 2012, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
After going through a gazillion of candidate fixes for PR52756, a
case where jump threading destroys loops in a non-recoverable way,
I settled with the following. The issue is
Hello,
On 19.01.2012 18:40, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 06:13:58PM +0400, Andrey Belevantsev wrote:
2012-01-19 Andrey Belevantseva...@ispras.ru
PR target/51106
* function.c (instantiate_virtual_regs_in_insn): Use
delete_insn_and_edges when removing a wrong
H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com writes:
The final rt_sigreturn syscall number is changed to 0x4201 in
Linux kernel v3.4-rc1. This patch updates x32 rt_sigreturn syscall
number. OK for trunk and 4.7 branch?
Sure.
Ian
On 3/04/2012, at 2:16 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
The point is that one can build a toolchain for i686-linux-gnu that will
support both 32-bit and 64-bit multilibs. The 32-bit multilib will be used
by default, and compilation for 64-bit user-space can be requested with -m64
option. Even
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 1:03 AM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
+struct
I have committed the following patch to fix the libffi build breakage I'm
seeing on powerpc64-linux (when building java) which was caused by the
recent merge of upstream libffi. Anthony Green ack'd this patch for
upstream, but said to commit it here and he'd merge the gcc sources
back to upstream
Ping 6...
It's now been over EIGHT MONTHS since I posted the patch, back in
stage 1 for 4.7. Can someone please review and/or approve this before
gcc 4.8's stage 1 is closed? This is needed as a first step for ABI
compatibility for rx-elf.
Ping 5...
Ping 4...
Ping 3? It's been
On 03/30/2012 08:13 AM, Sandeep Kumar Singh wrote:
Hi,
Please find the attached patch to avoid saving of EXR register for
monitor functions.
By default, in prologue code of a monitor function, EXR register is
pushed onto the stack. This implementation is not required for H8S/224x
and 21xx
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 06:52:34PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 29/03/12 20:34, dann frazier wrote:
This is an updated version of a patch Debian and Ubuntu are using to
use an alternate linker path for hardfloat binaries. The difference
with this one is that it covers the case where no
Hi!
On the following testcase compute_data_dependences_for_loop
fails, but build_rdg ignores its return value and happily goes
on as if it didn't fail, optimizing away a call.
Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux,
ok for trunk/4.7?
2012-04-02 Jakub Jelinek
I'll send the patches for trunk, gcc-4_7-branch, and gcc-4_6-branch in
a separate thread later today or tomorrow, but I need to get the
google branch fixed before that. Paolo suggested this simple fix was
the right approach for the gcc-4_6-branch, so I'm using it for
google/gcc-4_6 too. I'll be
On Apr 2, 2012, at 12:41 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
Ping 6...
It's now been over EIGHT MONTHS since I posted the patch, back in
stage 1 for 4.7. Can someone please review and/or approve this before
gcc 4.8's stage 1 is closed? This is needed as a first step for ABI
compatibility for rx-elf.
On 3 April 2012 09:06, dann frazier dann.fraz...@canonical.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 06:52:34PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 29/03/12 20:34, dann frazier wrote:
This is an updated version of a patch Debian and Ubuntu are using to
use an alternate linker path for hardfloat
41 matches
Mail list logo
