Committed to ARM/embedded-4_6-branch
2012-06-08 Joey Ye joey...@arm.com
Backport r182014 from mainline.
2011-12-05 Kazu Hirata k...@codesourcery.com
PR target/51408
* config/arm/arm.md (*minmax_arithsi): Always require the else
clause in the MINUS
On 29/05/12 09:31, Jim MacArthur wrote:
2012-05-28 Jim MacArthurjim.macart...@arm.com
* config/aarch64/t-aarch64: Delete.
* config.host (aarch64*-*-elf): Remove reference to t-aarch64.
I've committed this patch to the aarch64 branch.
/Marcus
On 31/05/12 16:33, Jim MacArthur wrote:
* config/aarch64/sync-cache.S: New file.
Corrected to sync-cache.c and committed to aarch64 branch.
/Marcus
I've merged revision 188326 from the gcc 4.7 branch to the gccgo
branch. I also included the two patches I sent out and have committed
to mainline but have not yet committed to 4.7 branch.
Ian
On 01/06/12 14:29, Jim MacArthur wrote:
In response to a comment from
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg01721.html, this patch removes
t-softfp-sfdf and t-softfp-excl from the aarch64 entries in libgcc/config.host.
Every setting in these files is overridden by t-softfp.
Addition
On 01/06/12 09:56, Sofiane Naci wrote:
Hi,
This patch re-factors TLS dialect option selection in the AArch64 port to
use the generic support for enumerated option arguments.
Thanks
Sofiane
-
2012-06-01 Sofiane Nacisofiane.n...@arm.com
[AArch64] Use Enums for TLS option
On 01/06/12 09:53, Sofiane Naci wrote:
Hi,
This patch replaces instances of sprintf with snprintf with sizeof(..) in
the AArch64 port.
It also fixes layout issues in the code it touches.
Thanks
Sofiane
-
ChangeLog
2012-06-01 Sofiane Nacisofiane.n...@arm.com
[AArch64] Replace
Committed to ARM/embedded-4_6-branch
2012-06-08 Joey Ye joey...@arm.com
Backport r184442 from mainline
2012-02-21 Richard Earnshaw rearn...@arm.com
PR target/52294
* thumb2.md (thumb2_shiftsi3_short): Split register and
immediate shifts. For
Hi
In rtl expression, substract a constant c is expressed as add a value -c, so it
is alse processed by adddi3, and I extend it more to handle a subtraction of
64bit constant. I created an insn pattern arm_subdi3_immediate to specifically
represent substraction with 64bit constant while continue
Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com writes:
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
index 1a25324..b93dc5c 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
@@ -3795,6 +3795,8 @@ proc
Hi all,
here is a patch for an ICE-on-invalid bug, which concerns the
allocation of CLASS variables. The ICE is fixed by changing the order
of the checks which are done in gfc_match_allocate, so that an error
is triggered before the ICE can occur.
Regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Ok for
On 06/06/12 21:45, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Looks good to me. (Note, that as someone with write access to the
GCC repository you don't need approval for changes like this, though
I am always happy to look at changes.)
Ok, thank you, I hadn't realized approval was not required.
Change
[Side note: The piece of code which I'm moving contains a FIXME
comment, which I don't quite understand, so I'm not sure whether it is
still valid. It was added by Steve in
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revisionrevision=145331. Does anyone
have an opinion on this?]
Possibly the comment
Hi,
Janus Weil wrote:
here is a patch for an ICE-on-invalid bug, which concerns the
allocation of CLASS variables. The ICE is fixed by changing the order
of the checks which are done in gfc_match_allocate, so that an error
is triggered before the ICE can occur.
Regtested on
Hi,
here is a patch for an ICE-on-invalid bug, which concerns the
allocation of CLASS variables. The ICE is fixed by changing the order
of the checks which are done in gfc_match_allocate, so that an error
is triggered before the ICE can occur.
Regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Ok for
Janus Weil wrote:
In any case, for those two, it does not trigger but one
gets later (resolve?) the error:
Error: Allocate-object at (1) must be ALLOCATABLE or a POINTER
Then I guess one can just remove the FIXME.
That's fine with me.
Regarding the error:
Error: Allocate-object at (1) is
Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com writes:
@@ -326,13 +336,18 @@
}
{
+ text=T
+ case $GOARCH in
+ ppc*) text=D ;;
This is wrong for ppc.
Andreas.
diff --git a/libgo/testsuite/gotest b/libgo/testsuite/gotest
index da1162e..208cbaf 100755
--- a/libgo/testsuite/gotest
+++
This fixes most of the libgo testsuite failures.
Andreas.
diff --git a/libgo/Makefile.am b/libgo/Makefile.am
index 1d761bc..7923567 100644
--- a/libgo/Makefile.am
+++ b/libgo/Makefile.am
@@ -1806,6 +1806,7 @@ CHECK = \
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 12:40:10PM +0200, Janus Weil wrote:
[Side note: The piece of code which I'm moving contains a FIXME
comment, which I don't quite understand, so I'm not sure whether it is
still valid. It was added by Steve in
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revisionrevision=145331.
[Side note: The piece of code which I'm moving contains a FIXME
comment, which I don't quite understand, so I'm not sure whether it is
still valid. It was added by Steve in
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revisionrevision=145331. Does anyone
have an opinion on this?]
It's been too long! I
Attached is a third version of the patch, which I will commit soon. It
adds at least the relevant standard reference to the resolution-stage
check, too, and fixes the regressions resulting from the changed error
message.
Committed as r188335.
Cheers,
Janus
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 07:10:02PM +0200, Janus Weil wrote:
[Side note: The piece of code which I'm moving contains a FIXME
comment, which I don't quite understand, so I'm not sure whether it is
still valid. It was added by Steve in
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revisionrevision=145331.
Hi, Paolo.
Here is the new version of patch. I have tested this version with gcc
testsuite only on i686 without new regressions, for now. Mips and arm
tests are in progress.
One strange thing I noticed:
No need for this gen_reg_rtx, either, by passing a NULL_RTX target below.
+
Hi!
This patch adds dwz -m DWARF extensions.
See http://www.dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=120604.1type=open
for more details and
http://sourceware.org/git/?p=dwz.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/multifile
for the tool that creates it. Compared to the DWARF5 proposal, this
is so far implemented as
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revisionrevision=188336
Revision 179760 changed casesi so that the libgcc code to read from
the lookup table by means of __tablejump2__ is used unconditionally,
i.e. does no more depend on -mcall-prologues.
Consequently, casesi costs no more depend on
On 06/01/2012 01:58 PM, Sterling Augustine wrote:
It also adds and documents a new option -g[no-]pubtypes which allows users
to generate pubtypes even if the target disables them by default.
Hmm, I thought the convention for this sort of flag was to start with
-f, that -g flags were only for
OK.
Jason
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 02:45:09PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 06/01/2012 01:58 PM, Sterling Augustine wrote:
It also adds and documents a new option -g[no-]pubtypes which allows users
to generate pubtypes even if the target disables them by default.
Hmm, I thought the convention for this
+/* Extensions for DWZ multifile.
+ See http://www.dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=120604.1type=open . */
I'd suggest repeating this comment below:
--- include/dwarf2.h.jj 2012-05-09 20:15:32.0 +0200
+++ include/dwarf2.h 2012-05-14 12:16:37.414204203 +0200
@@ -333,6 +333,9 @@
The following patch is to speed LRA up a bit. It also adds 2012 to
copyright.
The patch was sucessfully bootstrapped on x86-64.
Committed as rev. 188341.
2012-06-08 Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com
* lra-assigns.c: Add 2012 to copyright header. Use lra_assert
instead
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
This adds memcpy/memmove recognition to loop distribution (and
cleans it up some more). Issues are similar to memset and
not handled (and I just noticed we generate memset/memcpy even
with -fno-builtin ...).
On May 3, 2012, at 9:31 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
How does one turn random volunteer GCC hackers into spoiled brats?
So, brats aside, your new patch breaks my port...
diff --git a/gcc/Makefile.in b/gcc/Makefile.in
index 145e8b8..1eeeab9 100644
--- a/gcc/Makefile.in
+++ b/gcc/Makefile.in
@@
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-01/msg01427.html for the
previous discussion about the motivation for this patch and the choice
of __pthread_key_create (also the comment added in the code by this patch).
This had no effect on testsuite results on x86_64-linux-gnu
(Ubuntu EGLIBC
On Jun 8, 2012, at 4:11 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Apr 17, 2012, at 2:08 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
This patch enables GET_MODE_WIDER_MODE for MODE_PARTIAL_INT (by setting
the wider mode to the one the partial mode is based on), which is useful
for the port I'm working on: I can avoid defining
Hi,
This patch fixes the failure test case that I had submitted the last time.
The changeLog is testsuite/gChangeLog.gimplefe is as follows.
2012-06-09 Sandeep Soni soni.sande...@gmail.com
* gimple.dg/20120605-2.gimple : New.
While the changelog in gimple/ChangeLog is as
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
(1) While the address cost computation is assuming in some situations
that pre/post increment/decrement addressing will be used if
supported by the target, it isn't actually using the target's address
cost for such forms -- instead, just the cost of
36 matches
Mail list logo
