On 30 October 2013 02:47, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/24/13 02:20, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
Hi,
REG_INC note is lost in subreg2 pass when resolve_simple_move, which
might lead to wrong dependence for ira. e.g. In function
validate_equiv_mem of ira.c, it checks REG_INC note:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 05:15:24PM -0700, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:
Actually, I guessed the flags:
You don't have to guess them, if you look into
testsuite/g++/g++.log (or testsuite/gcc/gcc.log etc.), you can find them
there.
% ../gcc-inst/bin/g++ -g -fsanitize=address -static-libasan -O2
so in the end I guess I have nothing against the original patch
(with whatever form of the copy to reg call is desirable).
So ok to commit?
-Y
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:32:14AM +0400, Yury Gribov wrote:
so in the end I guess I have nothing against the original patch
(with whatever form of the copy to reg call is desirable).
So ok to commit?
Ok with the change suggested by Richard, I think it was:
addr = copy_to_mode_reg
Jason Merrill wrote:
On 10/28/2013 05:48 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
DEFTREECODE (RANGE_FOR_STMT, range_for_stmt, tcc_statement, 4)
has now a 5th operator (RANGE_FOR_IVDEP), which has the value
boolean_true_node - or NULL_TREE (via begin_range_for_stmt).
You don't need to add an operand, you
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
2013/10/29 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
On 10/29/13 07:52, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Yeah. I'm working on it right now. I've fixed known issues and now
I'm looking for others. Meanwhile here is a new patch version with
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 Oct 13:39, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/24/13 08:43, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
+/* Return the number of arguments used by call statement GS. */
+
+static inline unsigned
+gimple_call_num_nobnd_args (const_gimple gs)
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Cong Hou co...@google.com wrote:
For the define_expand I added as below, the else body is there to
avoid fall-through transformations to ABS operation in optabs.c.
Otherwise ABS will be converted to other operations even that we have
corresponding instructions
-Original Message-
From: Richard Henderson [mailto:r...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 11:07 PM
To: Zhenqiang Chen; Richard Earnshaw; 'Richard Biener'
Cc: GCC Patches
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/n] Add conditional compare support
On 10/28/2013 01:32 AM, Zhenqiang Chen
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
Marc pointed out that the handling of various BUILT_IN_MEM* and
BUILT_IN_STR* functions in tree-ssa-alias.c probably wasn't working as
intended because the code wasn't prepared for a common return value from
ao_ref_base,
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, Jeff Law wrote:
Marc pointed out that the handling of various BUILT_IN_MEM* and
BUILT_IN_STR* functions in tree-ssa-alias.c probably wasn't working as
intended because the code wasn't prepared for a
Hi!
I've noticed that this testcase doesn't clean up after itself.
Fixed thusly, committed as obvious to trunk.
This was nagging me last weekend.. ;)
What about automating this?
Manual part is attached.
The Adjust all callers below is too big to send to the list:
git grep -l -E
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, Richard Biener wrote:
For the POINTER_PLUS_EXPR offset argument you should use
int_cst_value () to access it (it will unconditionally sign-extend)
and use host_integerp (..., 0). That leaves the
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Hans-Peter Nilsson
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 10:38 AM
To: Zhenqiang Chen
Cc: Richard Earnshaw; 'Richard Biener'; GCC Patches
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/n] Add conditional
Hi!
Yesterday I've noticed that for AVX which allows unaligned operands in
AVX arithmetics instructions we still don't combine unaligned loads with the
AVX arithmetics instructions. So say for -O2 -mavx -ftree-vectorize
void
f1 (int *__restrict e, int *__restrict f)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Sharad Singhai sing...@google.com wrote:
This patch removes a deprecated option -ftree-vectorizer-verbose. It
was already implemented in terms of -fopt-info and makes little sense
to keep it around longer. It causes needless confusion as reported in
PR
2013/10/30 Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
2013/10/29 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
On 10/29/13 07:52, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Yeah. I'm working on it right now. I've fixed known issues and now
I'm looking
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:47:13AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
Yesterday I've noticed that for AVX which allows unaligned operands in
AVX arithmetics instructions we still don't combine unaligned loads with the
AVX arithmetics instructions. So say for -O2 -mavx -ftree-vectorize
void
Hi,
The pch-init leaves check objects lying around, remove them.
While at it, i noticed that i was getting warnings from the check since
it was invoced with xg++ -nostdinc++ on C source (in one of the two
iterations the check is run -- once per tool).
My suggestion is to use the correct tool to
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, Mike Stump wrote:
On Oct 29, 2013, at 5:43 AM, Richard Sandiford rsand...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de writes:
I think the cases Mike added should only be enabled when we can figure
them out at compile-time, too.
Well, the idea
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:53:58AM +0100, Ondřej Bílka wrote:
Yesterday I've noticed that for AVX which allows unaligned operands in
AVX arithmetics instructions we still don't combine unaligned loads with the
AVX arithmetics instructions. So say for -O2 -mavx -ftree-vectorize
void
f1
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:00:13AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
But the above is 16 byte unaligned load. Furthermore, GCC supports
-mavx256-split-unaligned-load and can emit 32 byte loads either as an
unaligned 32 byte load, or merge of 16 byte unaligned loads. The patch
affects only the
In C++ all classes have destructors, but we try to defer building the
implicit declaration. My patch causes us to build those implicit
declarations more often, which is probably a bit of a memory regression,
but it would be good for your code to handle the dtor being declared.
OK, patch
On 30 Oct 10:26, Richard Biener wrote:
Ick - you enlarge all return statements? But you don't set the actual value?
So why allocate it with 2 ops in the first place??
When return does not return bounds it has operand with zero value similar to
case when it does not return value. What is the
Without that patch, which I have copied from asan-dg.exp, I get tons of
failures because ld cannot find libcilkrts.
OK for committal?
Tobias
2013-10-30 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
* gcc.dg/cilk-plus/cilk-plus.exp: Add the libcilkrts library
path to the compile flags.
diff --git
On 24 Oct 23:34, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/21/13 05:59, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
This patch adds attributes 'bnd_variable_size' and 'bnd_legacy' used by
Pointers Checker.
Bootstrapped and tested on linux-x86_64.
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2013-10-21 Ilya Enkovich
On 24 Oct 23:55, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/21/13 06:10, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
This patch introduces two new contructor types supported by
cgraph_build_static_cdtor.
'B' type is used to initialize static objects (bounds) created by Pointers
Checker. The difference of this type from the
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 Oct 10:26, Richard Biener wrote:
Ick - you enlarge all return statements? But you don't set the actual value?
So why allocate it with 2 ops in the first place??
When return does not return bounds it has
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com
wrote:
On 30 Oct 10:26, Richard Biener wrote:
Ick - you enlarge all return statements? But you don't set the actual
value?
So why
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:05:58AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:00:13AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
But the above is 16 byte unaligned load. Furthermore, GCC supports
-mavx256-split-unaligned-load and can emit 32 byte loads either as an
unaligned 32 byte load, or
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Yesterday I've noticed that for AVX which allows unaligned operands in
AVX arithmetics instructions we still don't combine unaligned loads with the
AVX arithmetics instructions. So say for -O2 -mavx -ftree-vectorize
This
PR58854 is another manifestation of the usual issue with the scheduler
not understanding sp fp overlap issues and hoisting such adjustments
(see PR38644 for a long history on an earlier one) over accesses from
the frame. The usual bodge in the backend is attached.
Tested arm-none-eabi cross -
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:55:04PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
Surely you can't rely on CCP and VRP compute exactly the same
nonzero_bits. As you don't record/compute zero_bits you can't
tell whether a not set bit in nonzer_bits is don't know or
Kenneth Zadeck zad...@naturalbridge.com writes:
On 10/29/2013 06:37 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
This patch tries to update the main wide_int comment to reflect the current
implementation.
- bitsizetype is TImode on x86_64 and others, so I don't think it's
necessarily true that all
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 04:29:56PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Surely you can't rely on CCP and VRP compute exactly the same
nonzero_bits. As you don't record/compute zero_bits you can't
tell whether a not set bit in nonzer_bits is don't
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 01:11:53PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
+/* Return number of known trailing zero bits in EXPR, or, if the value of
+ EXPR is known to be zero, the precision of it's type. */
+
+int
unsigned int?
Ok.
+
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:55:44AM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Yesterday I've noticed that for AVX which allows unaligned operands in
AVX arithmetics instructions we still don't combine unaligned loads with the
AVX
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, Cong Hou wrote:
Hi
SAD (Sum of Absolute Differences) is a common and important algorithm
in image processing and other areas. SSE2 even introduced a new
instruction PSADBW for it. A SAD loop can be greatly accelerated by
this instruction after being vectorized. This
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Hans-Peter Nilsson
One thing I don't see other people mentioning, is that this patch has just
too
much code inside #ifdef
2013/10/30 Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com
wrote:
On 30 Oct 10:26, Richard Biener wrote:
Ick - you enlarge all return statements? But you don't set the actual
value?
So why allocate it with 2 ops in the
This adds a struct function taking variant of
pre_and_rev_post_order_compute that also drops the assert that
all blocks were visited (consistent with the function comment).
This makes graph.c not ICE on CFGs with unreachable blocks
which it tries to handle already, but it didn't notice that
RPO
Hi,
I'm having a look at this very old parsing issue. We reject things like:
struct S { void operator () (); };
void foo ()
{
( S()() );
}
because the parenthesized S()() triggers an hard error from groktypename
as called at the end of cp_parser_type_id (called by
Il 18/09/2013 11:45, Zhenqiang Chen ha scritto:
+;; Expand conditional compare according to the instruction patterns.
+(define_expand conditional_compare
+ [(set (match_operand 0 s_register_operand )
+ (match_operator 1
+ [(match_operator:SI 2 arm_comparison_operator
+
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, Richard Biener wrote:
For the POINTER_PLUS_EXPR offset argument you should use
int_cst_value () to access it (it will unconditionally sign-extend)
and use
On 10/30/2013 07:01 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Kenneth Zadeck zad...@naturalbridge.com writes:
On 10/29/2013 06:37 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
This patch tries to update the main wide_int comment to reflect the current
implementation.
- bitsizetype is TImode on x86_64 and others, so I
Partially fixing a bug that caused lookup errors in valid programs. For example:
templateInt T, Float U
pairT, U::type void f(T, U); // Error, no such pair
When entering a template scope, we tried to match the template to one
having the same constraints. Obviously pair doesn't have Int and
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 09:01:45PM +, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
Thanks! I will extract and check in the Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync for C work.
This broke bootstrap on i686-linux, fixed thusly, committed as obvious:
2013-10-30 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
* cilk.c
Applying a patch from Ville that adds diagnostics for the concept
specifier. Thanks Ville!
2013-10-30 Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilai...@gmail.com
* gcc/cp/decl.c (grokdeclarator): Reject concept keyword
in typedefs, function parameters, data members, non-static
member
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, Richard Biener wrote:
For the POINTER_PLUS_EXPR offset argument you should use
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:18 AM, bin.cheng bin.ch...@arm.com wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that IVOPT generates complex address expressions like below for iv
base.
arr_base[0].y
arr[0]
MEM[p+o]
It's even worse for targets support auto-increment addressing mode because
IVOPT
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 03:04:41PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
I'm sorry, you want me to move the c++1y VLA check into
compute_array_index_type, or just do the ubsan instrumentation in
there? Thanks,
Both.
Unfortunately, I'm having quite a lot of trouble with side-effects. :(
For e.g.
int
The following patch fixes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58784
LRA has an old check of legitimate addresses. It was written before a
newer address decomposition code which makes more correct checks of
addresses.
So I removed the old check.
Committed as rev. 204215.
Hello Everyone,
What I ideally wanted to do with my testsuite files was that I want all
the Cilk keywords test to compile no matter what the architecture is, but it
should only run in certain architectures where the runtime is enabled (this is
known statically and thus the testsuite
The following patch fixes:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58785
LRA chooses constraint 'm' for const_int operand. It means that the
const_int should be placed in memory but it does not happen as preferred
reload class hook returns LO_REGS for class NO_REGS which is result of
This isn't a regression but is tiny and removes an unnecessary
pessimisation, so I'm committing it to the 4.7 and 4.8 branches. The
problem doesn't exist on the trunk.
Tested x86_64-linux.
2013-10-30 Chris Studholme c...@cs.utoronto.ca
PR libstdc++/58912
*
On 10/29/2013 01:37 PM, Dehao Chen wrote:
If we're actually emitting the name now, we need to give it a name different
from the complete constructor. I suppose it makes sense to go with C4/D4 as
in the decloning patch,
Shall we do it in a separate patch? And I suppose binutils also need
to be
I find -Wformat warnings about unknown % codes when building with an
older GCC to be mildly annoying noise; this patch avoids them by passing
-Wno-format during stage 1.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Is this OK for trunk? Do you have another
theory of how this should work?
commit
On 10/30/2013 10:52 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
+ if ((flag_sanitize SANITIZE_VLA)
+ !processing_template_decl
You don't need to check processing_template_decl; the template case was
already handled above.
+ tree x = cp_save_expr (size);
+ x =
On 10/30/13 03:34, Richard Biener wrote:
* tree-ssa-alias.c (stmt_kills_ref_p_1): Handle case where
ao_ref_base returns a MEM_REF.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/alias-26.c: New test.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/alias-26.c
On Tue, 2013-09-10 at 15:36 +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Amongst other things, the rename_symtab.py script converts
symtab_node to symtab_node *.
This will lead to broken code on declarations that declare
more than one variable (only the first would get a *), so split
up such
On 10/30/13 00:09, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
On 30 October 2013 02:47, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/24/13 02:20, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
Hi,
REG_INC note is lost in subreg2 pass when resolve_simple_move, which
might lead to wrong dependence for ira. e.g. In function
validate_equiv_mem of
Il 30/10/2013 16:47, Jason Merrill ha scritto:
I find -Wformat warnings about unknown % codes when building with an
older GCC to be mildly annoying noise; this patch avoids them by passing
-Wno-format during stage 1.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Is this OK for trunk?
Ok.
On 10/30/13 03:26, Richard Biener wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/gimple.c b/gcc/gimple.c
index 3ddceb9..20f6010 100644
--- a/gcc/gimple.c
+++ b/gcc/gimple.c
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ gimple_build_with_ops_stat (enum gimple_code code, unsigned
subcode,
gimple
gimple_build_return (tree retval)
{
-
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:56:25AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 10/30/2013 10:52 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
+ if ((flag_sanitize SANITIZE_VLA)
+ !processing_template_decl
You don't need to check processing_template_decl; the template case
was already handled above.
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013, Richard Biener wrote:
Btw, get_addr_base_and_unit_offset may also return an offsetted
MEM_REF (from MEM [p_3, 17] for example). As we are interested in
pointers this could be handled by not requiring a memory reference
but extracting the base address and offset, covering
On 10/30/2013 02:47 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
2013-10-30 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_avx256_split_vector_move_misalign): If
op1 is misaligned_operand, just use *movmode_internal insn
rather than UNSPEC_LOADU load.
On 10/30/2013 06:14 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
+/* Return whether DECL, a method of a C++ TYPE, is trivial, that is to say
+ doesn't do anything for the objects of TYPE. */
+
+static bool
+is_trivial_method (const_tree decl, const_tree type)
+{
+ if (cpp_check (decl, IS_CONSTRUCTOR)
On 10/30/13 04:34, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
On 30 Oct 10:26, Richard Biener wrote:
Ick - you enlarge all return statements? But you don't set the
actual value? So why allocate it with 2 ops in the first place??
When return does not return bounds it has operand with zero value
similar to case
I found my problem: I put DONE outside of if not inside. You are
right. I have updated my patch.
I appreciate your comment and test on it!
thanks,
Cong
diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index 8a38316..84c7ab5 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
Forget to attach the patch file.
thanks,
Cong
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Cong Hou co...@google.com wrote:
I found my problem: I put DONE outside of if not inside. You are
right. I have updated my patch.
I appreciate your comment and test on it!
thanks,
Cong
diff --git
On 10/30/13 09:09, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
Hello Everyone, What I ideally wanted to do with my testsuite files
was that I want all the Cilk keywords test to compile no matter what
the architecture is, but it should only run in certain architectures
where the runtime is enabled (this is known
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 1:08 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V; Tobias Burnus; gcc patches
Subject: Re: Testsuite / Cilk Plus: Include library path in compile flags in
gcc.dg/cilk-plus/cilk-plus.exp
On 10/30/13 09:09, Iyer,
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013, Jeff Law wrote:
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-do run { target i?86-*-* x86-64-*-* } } */
But with an effective-target keyword cilkplusrts or similar, rather than
hardcoding the same list of targets in lots of places, please.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Myers [mailto:jos...@codesourcery.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 1:15 PM
To: Jeff Law
Cc: Iyer, Balaji V; Tobias Burnus; gcc patches
Subject: Re: Testsuite / Cilk Plus: Include library path in compile flags in
gcc.dg/cilk-plus/cilk-plus.exp
I ran into a build problem while doing a canadian cross build of GCC.
I was building on linux to create a Windows (mingw) GCC that generates
code for mips-mti-elf.
The mips-mti-elf target uses newlib for its system headers and libraries
and the headers do not include a fenv.h header file.
On 10/30/13 11:12, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 1:08 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V; Tobias Burnus; gcc patches
Subject: Re: Testsuite / Cilk Plus: Include library path in compile flags in
At the Chicago meeting the EWG agreed that we don't need to throw on
0-length VLAs.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
commit 1e328cbd26bfb641db8e218e4a4c32fc1a9a8d9d
Author: Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Oct 25 06:15:01 2013 -0400
* decl.c (cp_finish_decl): Never
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Cong Hou co...@google.com wrote:
I found my problem: I put DONE outside of if not inside. You are
right. I have updated my patch.
OK, great that we put things in order ;)
Does this patch need some extra middle-end functionality? I was not
able to vectorize char
On 10/30/13 11:16, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Myers [mailto:jos...@codesourcery.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 1:15 PM
To: Jeff Law
Cc: Iyer, Balaji V; Tobias Burnus; gcc patches
Subject: Re: Testsuite / Cilk Plus: Include library path in compile
OK.
Jason
On 10/30/13 04:48, Richard Biener wrote:
foo (int * p, unsigned int size)
{
unnamed type __bound_tmp.0;
long unsigned int D.2239;
long unsigned int _2;
sizetype _6;
int * _7;
bb 3:
__bound_tmp.0_4 = __builtin_ia32_arg_bnd (p_3(D));
bb 2:
_2 = (long unsigned int)
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 09:17:04AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 10/30/2013 02:47 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
2013-10-30 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_avx256_split_vector_move_misalign): If
op1 is misaligned_operand, just use *movmode_internal insn
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Yesterday I've noticed that for AVX which allows unaligned operands in
AVX arithmetics instructions we still don't combine unaligned loads with
the
AVX arithmetics instructions. So say for -O2 -mavx -ftree-vectorize
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Yesterday I've noticed that for AVX which allows unaligned operands in
AVX arithmetics instructions we still don't combine unaligned loads with
the
On 30 Oct 2013, at 08:16, Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com wrote:
The following patch fixes:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58785
LRA chooses constraint 'm' for const_int operand. It means that the
const_int should be placed in memory but it does not happen as preferred
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Cong Hou co...@google.com wrote:
I found my problem: I put DONE outside of if not inside. You are
right. I have updated my patch.
OK, great that we put things in order ;)
Does this patch
Also, as the current expand for abs() on 8/16bit integer is not used
at all, should I comment them temporarily now? Later I can uncomment
them once I finished the pattern recognizer.
thanks,
Cong
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at
On 30 Oct 11:40, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/30/13 04:48, Richard Biener wrote:
foo (int * p, unsigned int size)
{
unnamed type __bound_tmp.0;
long unsigned int D.2239;
long unsigned int _2;
sizetype _6;
int * _7;
bb 3:
__bound_tmp.0_4 = __builtin_ia32_arg_bnd (p_3(D));
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Cong Hou co...@google.com wrote:
I found my problem: I put DONE outside of if not inside. You are
right. I have updated my patch.
OK, great that we put things in order ;)
Does this patch need some extra middle-end functionality? I was not
able to vectorize
Kenneth Zadeck zad...@naturalbridge.com writes:
On 10/30/2013 07:01 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Kenneth Zadeck zad...@naturalbridge.com writes:
On 10/29/2013 06:37 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
This patch tries to update the main wide_int comment to reflect the current
implementation.
-
2013/10/30 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
On 10/30/13 04:34, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
On 30 Oct 10:26, Richard Biener wrote:
Ick - you enlarge all return statements? But you don't set the
actual value? So why allocate it with 2 ops in the first place??
When return does not return bounds it has
+/* Return whether DECL, a method of a C++ TYPE, is trivial, that is to
say + doesn't do anything for the objects of TYPE. */
+
+static bool
+is_trivial_method (const_tree decl, const_tree type)
+{
+ if (cpp_check (decl, IS_CONSTRUCTOR) !TYPE_NEEDS_CONSTRUCTING
(type)) +
Hi,
to resolve this simple ICE we only have to check the return value of
mark_used, like we do in a number of other places. Tested x86_64-linux.
Thanks!
Paolo.
/
/cp
2013-10-30 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
PR c++/58581
* call.c
On 10/18/13 14:17, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
Thanks Mikael. My only concern is the lack of adjustment when the value
found was already a SUBREG.
ie, let's assume rld[r].in_reg was something like
(subreg:XF (reg:DF) 0)
and our target is (reg:DF)
In this case it seems to
Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
What I ideally wanted to do with my testsuite files was that I want
all the Cilk keywords test to compile no matter what the architecture
is, but it should only run in certain architectures where the runtime
is enabled (this is known statically and thus the testsuite
* * *
Actually, I was wondering whether -fcilkplus should always automatically link
libcilkrts - akin to -fopenmp which links libgomp. Currently, one has to
specify it
manually.*
Yes, I would like that to happen. Do you have any pointers about how to do that?
OK.
Jason
Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
* * *
Actually, I was wondering whether -fcilkplus should always automatically link
libcilkrts - akin to -fopenmp which links libgomp. Currently, one has to
specify it
manually.*
Yes, I would like that to happen. Do you have any pointers about how to do that?
Well, if
On 10/30/13 13:27, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
* * *
Actually, I was wondering whether -fcilkplus should always automatically link
libcilkrts - akin to -fopenmp which links libgomp. Currently, one has to
specify it
manually.*
Yes, I would like that to happen. Do you have any pointers about how to
On 10/30/13 04:34, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Without that patch, which I have copied from asan-dg.exp, I get tons of
failures because ld cannot find libcilkrts.
OK for committal?
Tobias
cilk.diff
2013-10-30 Tobias Burnusbur...@net-b.de
* gcc.dg/cilk-plus/cilk-plus.exp: Add the
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
