Jerry DeLisle wrote:
The attached patch fixes namelist read/write and list directed read/write to
support UTF-8. I have attached a preliminary test case to use to experiment
with this. I will
need to set it up for the testsuite still.
Regression tested on x86-64-linux-gnu.
OK for trunk or
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
(Adding an i386 maintainer in Cc)
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00620.html
On Sun, 13 Apr 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
some people like having a macro to test if a type is available
Ping ...
BR,
Terry
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Terry Guo
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 3:36 PM
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Richard Earnshaw; Ramana Radhakrishnan
Subject: [Patch, GCC/Thumb1] Improve
On 23-04-14 17:10, Richard Sandiford wrote:
FWIW I think this should be a plain bool rather than a function,
like delay_sched2 etc.
Vladimir,
I've reimplemented the hook using DEFHOOKPOD instead of DEFHOOK, to make it a
plain bool.
OK for trunk?
Thanks,
- Tom
2013-04-29 Radovan
There is a minor typo in zh_CN.po, should change '-pic' to '-fpic'.
Best wishes,
Jincheng Miao
Index: gcc/po/zh_CN.po
===
--- gcc/po/zh_CN.po (revision 209734)
+++ gcc/po/zh_CN.po (working copy)
@@ -24308,7 +24308,7 @@ msgstr
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Terry Guo flame...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
I find the GCC function simplify_subreg fails to simplify rtx (subreg:SI
(and:DI (reg/v:DI 115 [ a ]) (const_int 4294967295 [0x])) 4) to zero
On 16 April 2014 09:12, Kyrill Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com wrote:
On 15/04/14 18:45, Eric Christopher wrote:
Testcase weirdness?
for (i 0; i N; ++i)
{
arr[i] = i;
expect[i] = __builtin_bswap64 (i);
if (y) /* Avoid vectorisation. */
abort ();
}
i
Hi all,
I'd like to ping the two patches at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00490.html
and
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00315.html
They fix a bug in aarch64 and I think they should go into the release branches.
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 28 March 2014 15:31, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
This adds DejaGNU tests of the existing AArch64 vuzp_* intrinsics, both
checking
the assembler output and the runtime results. Test bodies are in separate
files
ready to reuse for ARM in the third patch.
Putting these in a
On 28 March 2014 15:36, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
This patch replaces the temporary inline assembler for vtrn[q]_* in
arm_neon.h with equivalent calls to __builtin_shuffle. These are matched by
existing patterns in aarch64.c (aarch64_expand_vec_perm_const_1), outputting
the
On 7 April 2014 14:46, Kyrill Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com wrote:
2014-04-04 Kyrylo Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com
* config/aarch64/aarch64.h (TARGET_CPU_CPP_BUILTINS): Check
TARGET_SIMD rather than TARGET_GENERAL_REGS_ONLY.
(TARGET_SIMD): Take AARCH64_ISA_SIMD
The GMP people complained that we advertise outdated versions
in our install instructions. I tried to address that by not
explicitely listing a good version but only mention the version
that is the minimum requirement. I also added a reference to
contrib/download_prerequesites as the
On 10 April 2014 12:05, Kyrill Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com wrote:
Hi all,
This is the 4.8 version of the patch posted at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00315.html
TARGET_CRYPTO was not defined in 4.8 therefore that hunk is removed.
Ok for the 4.8 branch?
Thanks,
Kyrill
Hi all,
Pinging this:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg01276.html
Thanks,
Kyrill
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:15:31AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
We probably should try to bump the versions used by that script
to something more recent though (should we do that for the 4.9
branch even?). Any idea what to choose here? I'd say mpc
1.0.2 is fine, so is mpfr 3.1.2, but should
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 8:01 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
The more aggressive threading across loop backedges requires invalidating
equivalences that do not hold across all iterations of a loop.
At first glance, invaliding at PHI nodes should be sufficient as any
statement which
-Original Message-
From: Mike Stump [mailto:mikest...@comcast.net]
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 11:39 PM
To: Joey Ye
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [patch, testsuite] Fix fragile case nsdmi-union5
On Apr 17, 2014, at 10:28 PM, Joey Ye joey...@arm.com wrote:
Resulting
Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de writes:
The GMP people complained that we advertise outdated versions
in our install instructions. I tried to address that by not
explicitely listing a good version but only mention the version
that is the minimum requirement. I also added a reference to
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/23/14 15:13, David Malcolm wrote:
On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 15:04 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 04/21/14 10:56, David Malcolm wrote:
This updates all of the gimple_bind_* accessors in gimple.h from taking
a
plain gimple to
Recent versions of the Solaris/x86 assembler are gaining support for cfi
directives. gcc/configure failed to detect this since it used a
gas-only option for 64-bit code generation. This patch fixes it.
Tested on a wide range of assembler/linker configurations on
i386-pc-solaris2.1[01],
On Fri, 2014-04-18 at 10:03 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Samuel Thibault, le Thu 17 Apr 2014 00:03:45 +0200, a écrit :
Thomas Schwinge, le Wed 09 Apr 2014 09:36:42 +0200, a écrit :
Well, the first step is to verify that TARGET_THREAD_SPLIT_STACK_OFFSET
and similar configury is correct
Bootstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu with no testsuite regression. Also did a
arm-none-eabi cross build with no regression after running testsuite via
qemu
Forgot to ask if it's ok for trunk. Same question for part 1 and 3.
Best regards,
Thomas
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, Rainer Orth wrote:
Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de writes:
The GMP people complained that we advertise outdated versions
in our install instructions. I tried to address that by not
explicitely listing a good version but only mention the version
that is the
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:15:31AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
We probably should try to bump the versions used by that script
to something more recent though (should we do that for the 4.9
branch even?). Any idea what to choose here? I'd say
On 23/04/14 21:35, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 04/23/2014 12:43 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
Any c++ compilation aborts at
That's surprising, the code I touched is only ever supposed to run while
compiling one file in libsupc++, if I understand correctly.
Ah, well, perhaps it's one of the first
Currently, Solaris/x86 uses a private version of
ASM_PREFERRED_EH_DATA_FORMAT since older versions of the Solaris
assembler couldn't calculate the difference between labels in different
sections. This restriction has been lifted in Solaris 10 patch
119961-07 from May 2010. Since the redefinition
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:38:38AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
Is there a reason why you have lowered the minimum versions (4.3.2 - 4.2.3,
2.4.2 - 2.4.0, 0.8.1 - 0.8.0)?
As I say will not work I checked what we reject at configure time
(for the oldest versions that work we'll complain
Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de writes:
I'd strongly advise against it: in the past we've had serious problems
with versions newer than advertised in install.texi on some platforms.
Until we have positive evidence that specific newer versions work on a
wide range of platforms, we shouldn't
Meanwhile is does the patch look ok?
No, the current wording is just fine and yours doesn't bring anything (even
the contrary, since you're listing known problematic versions). This will
also break http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#sparc-x-x
I don't see why we should special case GMP,
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Meanwhile is does the patch look ok?
No, the current wording is just fine and yours doesn't bring anything (even
the contrary, since you're listing known problematic versions). This will
also break
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Meanwhile is does the patch look ok?
No, the current wording is just fine and yours doesn't bring anything (even
the contrary, since you're listing known problematic versions). This will
also
On 23 April 2014 20:17, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
This adds DejaGNU tests of the existing AArch64 vrev_* intrinsics, both
checking the assembler output and the runtime results. Test bodies are in
separate files ready to reuse for ARM in the third patch.
All tests passing on
On 23 April 2014 20:44, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
This patch (borrowing heavily from the ARM backend) makes
aarch64_expand_vec_perm_const output REV instructions when appropriate,
and then implements the vrev_XXX intrinsics in terms of __builtin_shuffle
(which
now produces
On 23 April 2014 21:01, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
This adds DejaGNU tests of the existing AArch64 vext* intrinsics, both
checking the assembler output and the runtime results. Test bodies are in
separate files ready to reuse for ARM in the third patch.
All passing on
Ping! Does anybody know the current record of longest ping? I'd like
to at least break it before giving up.
On 04/03/2014 06:32 PM, Dimitris Papavasiliou wrote:
Still pinging.
On 03/28/2014 11:58 AM, Dimitris Papavasiliou wrote:
Ping!
On 03/23/2014 03:20 AM, Dimitris Papavasiliou wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2014, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 04/13/2014 01:41 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
this patch generates typeinfo for target types. On x86_64, it adds these
6
lines to nm -C libsupc++.a. A follow-up patch
Tested on ia64-suse-linux and installed as obvious.
Andreas.
* config/abi/post/ia64-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt: Update for
new CXXABI_1.3.9 symbols.
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/config/abi/post/ia64-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt
On 24 April 2014 04:47, Tim Shen wrote:
Booted and tested with -m32 and -m64.
I should give an explanation:
When traversing a graph in _M_clone(), it should stop at a node with
id _M_end. However, if _M_end has other outgoing edge (_M_alt), the
edge should be concerned too. So this patch
The following fixes PR60912 - a bug with IPA PTA computing
the use/clobber sets for direct calls where it optimized
walking using the cgraph nodes caller list. But that can
be incomplete in the face of aliases. Luckily that
optimization is no longer necessary because we now cache
the outcome of
Simple IPA passes are supposed to see function bodies with IPA transforms
applied - this is what the code in execute_one_pass tries to ensure.
But that doesn't work anymore with on-demand function-body loading.
The following addresses this in the least intrusive way - inlining
do_per_function
Jeff Law l...@redhat.com writes:
On 04/22/14 02:03, Richard Sandiford wrote:
First of all, thanks a lot for doing this. Maybe one day we'll have
the same in rtl :-)
Funny you should mention that. I blocked off a hunk of time for David
to investigate doing some work on that this year.
On Wed, 23 Apr 2014, Cong Hou wrote:
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60896 for bug report.
The cause of PR60896 is that those statements in PATTERN_DEF_SEQ in
pre-recognized widen-mult pattern are not forwarded to later
recognized dot-product pattern.
Another issue is
gcc/ChangeLog:
2014-04-11 Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com
* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_evpc_tbl): enable for bigendian.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2014-04-11 Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com
* lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_vect_perm):
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Kugan
kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org wrote:
Value range propagation simplifies convergence in vrp_visit_phi_node by
setting minimum to TYPE_MIN when the computed minimum is smaller than
the previous minimum. This can however result in pessimistic value
On 04/24/2014 04:33 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/23/14 15:13, David Malcolm wrote:
On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 15:04 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 04/21/14 10:56, David Malcolm wrote:
This updates all of the gimple_bind_* accessors
On 04/23/2014 10:42 AM, Michael Matz wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 21 Apr 2014, David Malcolm wrote:
case GIMPLE_SWITCH:
dump_gimple_switch (buffer, gs-as_a_gimple_switch (), spc, flags);
break;
where the -as_a_gimple_switch is a no-op cast from gimple to the more
concrete
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2014, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 04/13/2014 01:41 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
this patch generates typeinfo for target types. On x86_64, it adds
On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 13:58 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 04/21/14 10:56, David Malcolm wrote:
[...]
So, generally I like it. It looks pretty much like what I'd expect from
this kind of work.
So it sounds like Richi really prefers the explicit casting rather than
member functions. It seems
Well some of these scalar types are not really user visible which is
where I believe the problem is coming from and prima-facie I don't
think we should be inventing mangling for some of these internal
types.
If the types are not user-visible, it is not clear to me why they need to be
On 14-04-23 11:38 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg00934.html
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg01634.html)
This patch breaks building arm-eabi with a 32bit host gcc.
e.g
../../gcc/config/arm/aarch-common.c
On 24/04/14 14:44, Ryan Mansfield wrote:
On 14-04-23 11:38 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg00934.html
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg01634.html)
This patch breaks building arm-eabi with a 32bit host gcc.
e.g
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Kyrill Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com wrote:
On 24/04/14 14:44, Ryan Mansfield wrote:
On 14-04-23 11:38 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg00934.html
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg01634.html)
This patch
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
Well some of these scalar types are not really user visible which is
where I believe the problem is coming from and prima-facie I don't
think we should be inventing mangling for some of these internal
types.
If the types are not user-visible,
Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2014-04-11 Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com
* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_evpc_tbl): enable for bigendian.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2014-04-11 Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com
* lib/target-supports.exp
This PR is about not very clear error message when one tries to
add attributes *after* the declarator in a function definition.
cc1plus already handles this well, so I used the same message.
Regtested/bootstrapped on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
2014-04-24 Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com
For signed min / -1 we set the overflow flag (good) but also returned a
quotient of 0. It should be 0x80...0 instead. Since that's also the
value of the original dividend, we can just copy the representation over.
The value for division by 0 is probably pretty arbitrary. double-int.c
seems to
Simple IPA passes are supposed to see function bodies with IPA transforms
applied - this is what the code in execute_one_pass tries to ensure.
But that doesn't work anymore with on-demand function-body loading.
The following addresses this in the least intrusive way - inlining
This is fine with me.
kenny
On 04/24/2014 10:34 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
For signed min / -1 we set the overflow flag (good) but also returned a
quotient of 0. It should be 0x80...0 instead. Since that's also the
value of the original dividend, we can just copy the representation over.
Hi,
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
Well, we ought to settle on one... either use the is_a, as_a, and
dyn_cast paradigm as they exist today, or we use the cast_as_method
approach everywhere. I'm not fond of each potential project having a
different approach... I'd like to see
On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 09:09 -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 04/24/2014 04:33 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/23/14 15:13, David Malcolm wrote:
On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 15:04 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 04/21/14 10:56, David
Richard Sandiford mentioned here (
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00870.html ):
...
Although we really should have a utility function like use_reg, but for
clobbers, so that the above would become:
clobber_reg (CALL_INSN_FUNCTION_USAGE (insn), gen_rtx_REG (word_mode,
The hook is called right after expansion of calls, and allows a target to do
additional processing, such as f.i. adding clobbers to
CALL_INSN_FUNCTION_USAGE.
Instead of using the hook, we could add code to the preparation statements
operand of the different call expands, but that requires
Marc Glisse wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2014, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 04/13/2014 01:41 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
this patch generates typeinfo for target types. On
On 04/24/14 02:22, Richard Biener wrote:
+
+ if (backedge_seen)
+ FOR_EACH_SSA_TREE_OPERAND (op, stmt, iter, SSA_OP_ALL_DEFS)
You only need SSA_OP_DEF here, no need to process virtual
operands.
I went back and forth on this. I couldn't come up with a case where
we'd do the
On 04/24/14 01:23, Jincheng Miao wrote:
There is a minor typo in zh_CN.po, should change '-pic' to '-fpic'.
Best wishes,
Jincheng Miao
Thanks. Applied to the trunk.
jeff
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com wrote:
Unless I'm doing something wrong the new tests you added already give
the right results, do you have a testcase that fails with the current
code?
This testcase fails before the patch. Sorry for that.
--
Regards,
On Feb 6, 2014, at 1:25 AM, Dimitris Papavasiliou dpapa...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a patch regarding a couple of Objective-C related dialect options and
warning switches.
Ok.
Committed revision 209753.
If you could, please add documentation and a test case.
Hi,
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, David Malcolm wrote:
Implicit naming
===
Several people have suggested that the gimple_ prefix is redundant.
Not generally though (for instance I find it redundant in the
cast-method names, but _not_ in the global types).
Andrew MacLeod suggested in:
On 24/04/14 14:44, Ryan Mansfield wrote:
On 14-04-23 11:38 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg00934.html
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg01634.html)
This patch breaks building arm-eabi with a 32bit host gcc.
Hi Ryan,
Does this patch fix it
Hi,
PR60930 exposes an SLSR problem with a fold. When multiplying two
constants to create a new stride, the result must fit in the stride type
for the computation or the fold is invalid.
Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu with no
regressions. The same patch applies
On 24/04/14 11:49 -0400, Tim Shen wrote:
This testcase fails before the patch. Sorry for that.
Great, thanks - OK for trunk.
Assuming no problems on the trunk we might want to backport it for
4.9.1 in a few weeks.
On 14-04-24 12:12 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 24/04/14 14:44, Ryan Mansfield wrote:
On 14-04-23 11:38 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg00934.html
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg01634.html)
This patch breaks building arm-eabi with a 32bit
On 24/04/14 17:46, Ryan Mansfield wrote:
On 14-04-24 12:12 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 24/04/14 14:44, Ryan Mansfield wrote:
On 14-04-23 11:38 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg00934.html
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg01634.html)
This
Even though gengtype patches needing review are quite rare, I am
unable to review quickly enough those few that do come. Thus stepping
down, the patch below is committed.
Index: ChangeLog
===
--- ChangeLog (revision 209731)
+++
I sent an earlier patch to change how GCC configure was setting default
values of caddr_t and ssize_t. That patch fixed a build problem I had
when building GCC for Windows using the mingw tools but only because my
patch was wrong. Here is a new patch to fix the problem.
The problem was that
Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr writes:
this is a follow-up for this patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00618.html
once committed, g++ will generate typeinfo for __float128, and it needs
versioning. While there, I noticed that __int128 has typeinfo but not
typeinfo name,
On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 10:23 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
+AC_CHECK_TYPES([ssize_t])
+AC_CHECK_TYPES([caddr_t])
But I am not sure what header file this code would go in.
In system.h.
Steve Ellcey
FYI: I ran into problems defining ssize_t and caddr_t in system.h
because it was
Hi,
On 28 January 2014 13:10, Ramana Radhakrishnan
ramana@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Ian Bolton ian.bol...@arm.com
wrote:
Hi there!
An existing optimisation for Thumb-2 converts t32 encodings to
t16 encodings to reduce codesize, at the expense of
Given the following loop:
int a[N];
short b[N*2];
for (int i = 0; i N; ++i)
a[i] = b[i*2];
After being vectorized, the access to b[i*2] will be compiled into
several packing statements, while the type promotion from short to int
will be compiled into several unpacking statements. With this
Steve Ellcey sell...@mips.com writes:
diff --git a/libgcc/crtstuff.c b/libgcc/crtstuff.c
index 12bed4b..d09455f 100644
--- a/libgcc/crtstuff.c
+++ b/libgcc/crtstuff.c
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ see the files COPYING3 and COPYING.RUNTIME respectively.
If not, see
#include auto-host.h
#undef
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, Rainer Orth wrote:
Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr writes:
this is a follow-up for this patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00618.html
once committed, g++ will generate typeinfo for __float128, and it needs
versioning. While there, I noticed that
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, Marek Polacek wrote:
This PR is about not very clear error message when one tries to
add attributes *after* the declarator in a function definition.
cc1plus already handles this well, so I used the same message.
I thought you had an earlier version of the patch where,
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com wrote:
Great, thanks - OK for trunk.
Assuming no problems on the trunk we might want to backport it for
4.9.1 in a few weeks.
Committed. Thanks.
--
Regards,
Tim Shen
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Michael Meissner
meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
This patch adds the last set of instructions in the ISA 2.05 (power6), ISA
2.06
(power7), and ISA 2.07 (power8) specifications as builtins. As far as I know,
this completes the set of user space instructions
On Nov 25, 2013, at 12:46 AM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
Richi has asked the we break the wide-int patch so that the individual port
and front end maintainers can review their parts without have to go through
the entire patch.This patch covers the ada front-end.
I don't
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 08:25:52PM +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, Marek Polacek wrote:
This PR is about not very clear error message when one tries to
add attributes *after* the declarator in a function definition.
cc1plus already handles this well, so I used the same
On Nov 25, 2013, at 2:57 AM, Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
Richi has asked the we break the wide-int patch so that the individual port
and front end maintainers can review their parts without have to go
Jeff Law wrote:
On 04/24/14 01:23, Jincheng Miao wrote:
There is a minor typo in zh_CN.po, should change '-pic' to '-fpic'.
Thanks for the patch
Thanks. Applied to the trunk.
Jeff, are you sure that this will not be overridden? I think the
translations are always synced from
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 01:12:02PM +0300, Dimitris Papavasiliou wrote:
Ping! Does anybody know the current record of longest ping? I'd
like to at least break it before giving up.
How has this been tested?
I'm seeing:
+FAIL: obj-c++.dg/local-decl-1.mm -fgnu-runtime (test for warnings, line
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 6:23 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:59 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/19/13 19:33, David Malcolm wrote:
FWIW, it looks like you attached the whitespace
On 04/16/14 18:20, seg...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 02:45:28PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
Isn't the problem that operands 1 is a MEM which use the same register
as operands 3 in the memory address?
Yes, exactly.
ISTM either removing the memory constraint entirely, or
On 04/17/14 04:07, Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/18/14 04:13, bin.cheng wrote:
Hi,
After control flow graph change made by
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-02/msg01492.html, case
gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-thread-4.c is broken on
On 04/18/14 02:28, Marc Glisse wrote:
Ping
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg01480.html
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
although setting CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET before compiling gcc works fine,
CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET is ignored. I don't see any good reason for that.
I
On 01/02/14 10:21, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi,
While looking for -Winline messages I noticed that sched-int.h has self
recursive
function declared inline. The recursion is tail recursion but we fail to
recognize
it as such. The problem ist hat there is a local variable link whose address
is passed
On 01/02/14 10:30, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi,
those functions are not inlined since they are too large anyway.
I do not think it is disaster. get_attr_length_1 takes a callback
that may make it more interesting inlining candidate than others,
perhaps.
Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, OK?
Honza
On 02/12/14 02:51, Marek Polacek wrote:
I figured it might be a good idea to warn about variadic main decl
(well, not in freestanding environment where it's
implementation-defined).
Regtested/bootstrapped on x86_64-linux, ok for 5.0?
2014-02-12 Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com
PR
Hi!
As the testcase shows, this patch fixes some issues with lastprivate/linear
iteration vars of OpenMP loops (for/simd).
One issue was that we were disallowing explicit linear or lastprivate
clause for the iteration var, but in the final 4.0 standard while it
is predetermined linear (collapse
On 02/24/14 12:28, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:01:25AM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
Replaced tab by 4 spaces before error_at.
* c-parser.c (c_parser_sizeof_expression): Remove goto sizeof_expr.
Looks good now, but I can't approve it. Thanks,
Applied to the trunk.
Hi!
I've apparently missed a paragraph that made into OpenMP 4.0
on page 131:
In all atomic construct forms, the seq_cst clause and the clause that denotes
the
type of the atomic construct can appear in any order. In addition, an optional
comma
may be used to separate the clauses.
While the
I committed this patch as obvious to fix the s390 build.
Thanks,
Richard
Index: gcc/config/s390/s390.c
===
--- gcc/config/s390/s390.c 2014-04-24 22:42:21.799411496 +0100
+++ gcc/config/s390/s390.c 2014-04-24
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
