Hi Michael,
-Original Message-
From: Michael Eager [mailto:ea...@eagerm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2014 11:12 AM
To: David Holsgrove; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Edgar Iglesias; John Williams; Vidhumouli Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala; Ajit
Kumar Agarwal
Subject: Re: [Patch,
Hi!
When writing this code, I've been assuming __builtin_ffs* argument
is unsigned, which is the case of popcount also handled there, and
many other builtins (clz, ctz, ...), except that clrsb has signed argument.
But in reality for some reason ffs has signed argument and some time ago
Marek has
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Bin Cheng bin.ch...@arm.com wrote:
Hi Ramana,
This is the rebased patch, there is no conflict against latest trunk. I am
still doing some tests. Is it OK if tests are fine?
Also, it depends on patch at
We have reverted the patch for now but I note that at least the piece
below is a step backward from doing the compare in the on-disk
format.
Why it is step backward from compare in the on-dist format? All the information
is still streamed, just not duplicated. Since we explicitly stream
On Tue, 8 Jul 2014, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi,
I had to revert change to ipa-prop.c that made stmt_may_be_vtbl_ptr_store
to know that clobbers can not be such stores.
This triggered byg in detect_type_change_from_memory_writes. This function
does
two things. First is that it tries to prove
Hi Samuel,
This seems like a good idea to me.
On 07/08/2014 02:35 AM, Samuel Bronson wrote:
Ping? If nobody has anything else to say, I'm going to assume that such
a change is unobjectionable, and should not be listed in the ChangeLog.
When in doubt, look for precedence.
grep will show
On Tue, 8 Jul 2014, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
When writing this code, I've been assuming __builtin_ffs* argument
is unsigned, which is the case of popcount also handled there, and
many other builtins (clz, ctz, ...), except that clrsb has signed argument.
But in reality for some reason ffs
Hi Ramana,
This is the rebased patch, there is no conflict against latest trunk. I am
still doing some tests. Is it OK if tests are fine?
Also, it depends on patch at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01923.html, I will update that
patch two.
Thanks,
bin
Index:
As promised and analyzed in the DOM thread the following patch
removes restriction on copy propagating through PHIs on loop
exits (when we don't have to preserve loop-closed SSA form).
Fallout in out-of-SSA coalescing has been dealt with there.
Bootstrapped and tested on
Cesar Philippidis wrote:
Thomas, is this OK for gomp-4_0-branch?
...
* gcc/fortran/scanner.c (gfc_next_char_literal): Fix the scan for
*$acc.
This changes looks good to me.
* parse.c (next_fixed): Don't handle openmp pragmas when scanning
for openacc pragmas.
No regressions on arm-none-eabi or armeb-none-eabi; also FAIL-PASS on local
copies of the execution-result tests in gcc.target/arm/simd tests (taken from
mainline, these are not present in 4.9).
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR target/61062
Backport r211369 from mainline.
2014-06-09
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
bilbotheelffri...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This patch adds few test-cases for gimple match-and-simplfiy and
removes match-2.c
[gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa]
* match-2.c: Remove.
* match-plusminus.c: New test-case.
* match-bitwise.c:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 4:21 AM, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
I'll admitt I'm not actually sure if the spec requires this, or if gcc 4.5 was
too picky, but this fixes the build with gcc 4.5, and it doesn't really hurt
anything.
bootstrapped
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 5:01 AM, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
Hi,
just $subject
bootstrapped + regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, ok?
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
Trev
gcc/
* graphite-htab.h: Use hash_map instead of hash_table.
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 2:25 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Index: stor-layout.c
===
--- stor-layout.c (revision 212098)
+++ stor-layout.c (working copy)
@@ -2065,7 +2065,7 @@ void
finish_builtin_struct
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 09:28:55PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On July 7, 2014 9:06:17 PM CEST, Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 11:46:27AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon,
Hello Marc.
On 04 Jul 21:11, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jul 2014, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
like combining 2 shuffles unless the result is the identity. And
expanding shuffles that can be done in a single instruction works
well.
But I am happy not doing them yet. To be very specific, could you
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 03:14:04PM +0400, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
On the over hand, updated in such a way intrinsic
may actually generate different instruction then intended (e.g. FMA case).
It is the same with scalars, we have -ffp-contract for that.
Agreed.
I don't think we actually
This corrects name-mangling of float64x1_t and makes it a distinct type from
float64_t, as per ACLE - the error mentioned in the Caveats section at
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/changes.html.
(Only) Changes from the original patch are to remove references to
__builtin_aarch64_im_lane_boundsi
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
No regressions on arm-none-eabi or armeb-none-eabi; also FAIL-PASS on local
copies of the execution-result tests in gcc.target/arm/simd tests (taken
from mainline, these are not present in 4.9).
Ok unless an RM
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
As for 4.8, I'm intending to backport the ZIP/UZP/TRN fix for ARM big-endian
in r211369 of mainline. That patches arm_neon.h, so again we need to remove
the OCAML code by which that file is autogenerated...ok?
Ok
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
Moving into own thread from
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg01895.html
This fixes the compilation failures of gcc.target/arm/simd/vexts64_1.c and
gcc.target/arm/simd/vextu64_1.c that I introduced in r by
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 12:28:54PM +0100, Alan Lawrence wrote:
This corrects name-mangling of float64x1_t and makes it a distinct type from
float64_t, as per ACLE - the error mentioned in the Caveats section at
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/changes.html.
(Only) Changes from the original patch
Hello,
We recently checked into gomp4-offload branch fix allowing bootstrap to pass
as well as fix for disabling multilib for liboffloadmic (64-bit only).
--
Thanks, K
On 8 July 2014 12:39, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 12:28:54PM +0100, Alan Lawrence wrote:
This corrects name-mangling of float64x1_t and makes it a distinct type from
float64_t, as per ACLE - the error mentioned in the Caveats section at
Ping^2
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg02399.html
Kyrill
On 20/06/14 15:17, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
Now that Alan fixed the float64x1_t machinery, this patch implements
some low-hanging intrinsics
in arm_neon.h.
Tested aarch64-none-elf and bootstrapped on aarch64-linux.
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 01:08:27PM +0100, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
float64_t, as per ACLE - the error mentioned in the Caveats section at
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/changes.html.
... along with a statement that this would be fixed
Clearly the ABI change between 4.9.0 and 4.9.1 is not
Surprising. Is the symbol defined in libisl.so? You could use objdump to
check?
If I am not mistaken, objdump shows that libisl.so contains it.
objdump -d libisl.so.10.2.2 | grep isl_ast_expr_get_val
00060380 isl_ast_expr_get_val:
60383: 74 4b je 603d0
Hi!
This is an attempt to move the warning about transposed memset arguments
from the glibc headers to gcc FEs. The problem with the warning in glibc
is that it uses __builtin_constant_p and e.g. jump threading very often
makes the warning trigger even on code where it is very unlikely a user
The ChangeLog should be per-function. Otherwise LGTM.
I've fixed this.
--
Cheers, Roman Gareev
2014-07-04 Roman Gareev gareevro...@gmail.com
gcc/
* graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c (generate_isl_context):
Add __isl_give to the
On 08/07/2014 14:52, Roman Gareev wrote:
The ChangeLog should be per-function. Otherwise LGTM.
I've fixed this.
OK, LGTM then.
Tobias
On 07/07/14 12:01, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
This patch adds the rtx costs table for the Cortex-A5 core.
Tested arm-none-eabi and looked at the codegen for various codebases to
make sure there's no regression in code quality.
Ok for trunk?
Thanks,
Kyrill
2014-07-07 Kyrylo
On 08/07/2014 14:47, Roman Gareev wrote:
Surprising. Is the symbol defined in libisl.so? You could use objdump to
check?
If I am not mistaken, objdump shows that libisl.so contains it.
objdump -d libisl.so.10.2.2 | grep isl_ast_expr_get_val
00060380 isl_ast_expr_get_val:
60383: 74
A fix and some minor tweaks. Tested x86_64-linux, committed to trunk.
commit 7f2475d59cc4ca4729341021e8b418ca77f7ccb2
Author: Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jul 8 13:33:02 2014 +0100
* include/bits/allocated_ptr.h (__allocated_ptr::operator=): Add
missing return.
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 05:23:28PM +0100, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 03:45:10PM +0100, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
On 24 June 2014 09:45, James Greenhalgh james.greenha...@arm.com wrote:
2014-06-20 James Greenhalgh james.greenha...@arm.com
*
Hi,
the defect
(http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#1584) is
Ready and both clang and SolarisStudio already implement it. The below
very simple tweak seems enough, testing is fine on x86_64-linux.
Thanks!
Paolo.
/
/cp
2014-07-08 Paolo Carlini
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014, Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/06/14 08:23, Marc Glisse wrote:
What is the lifetime of an SSA_NAME with a default definition? The way
we handle it now, we start from the uses and go back to all blocks that
can reach one of the uses, since there is no defining statement where we
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 08:35:14AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, i686-linux and s390{,x}-linux. Ok
for trunk/4.9?
I'd like to see this in 4.9.1, it is a wrong-code regression from 4.8.x,
so I'm pinging this now:
2014-07-03 Jakub Jelinek
On 07/02/2014 01:18 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
We propagate types from places we know instances are created across pointers
passed to functions. Once non-POD type is created at a given memory
location,
one can not change its type by placement_new into something else.
Hmm. If the memory
On 8 July 2014 13:31, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Many people are using different patch levels interchangeably and expect
them to be compatible. If X1 vectors are relatively rare, the better,
fewer people will be affected when switching from 4.9.x to 4.10.x.
But IMHO changing ABI
So the issue seems to be:
gcov_info_type = lang_hooks.types.make_type (RECORD_TYPE);
gcov_fn_info_type = lang_hooks.types.make_type (RECORD_TYPE);
gcov_fn_info_ptr_type = build_pointer_type
(build_qualified_type (gcov_fn_info_type, TYPE_QUAL_CONST));
build_fn_info_type
On 07/08/2014 02:21 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Cesar Philippidis wrote:
Thomas, is this OK for gomp-4_0-branch?
...
* gcc/fortran/scanner.c (gfc_next_char_literal): Fix the scan for
*$acc.
This changes looks good to me.
* parse.c (next_fixed): Don't handle openmp
On 07/07/2014 02:55 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jul 2014 16:10:56 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
cesar_philippi...@mentor.com wrote:
This patch is the first step to enabling parallel reductions in openacc.
Thanks!
As mentioned earlier, this patch isn't complete yet. For starters,
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
On 07/02/2014 01:18 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
We propagate types from places we know instances are created across pointers
passed to functions. Once non-POD type is created at a given memory
location,
one can not change its type
On July 8, 2014 4:03:05 PM CEST, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
So the issue seems to be:
gcov_info_type = lang_hooks.types.make_type (RECORD_TYPE);
gcov_fn_info_type = lang_hooks.types.make_type (RECORD_TYPE);
gcov_fn_info_ptr_type = build_pointer_type
(build_qualified_type
I just checked. It doesn't work on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 due to following
statement:
.type myBindC, @function
So can we settle for
--- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bind_c_array_params_2.f90
2014-05-24 16:17:53.0 +0200
+++
On Tue, 8 Jul 2014, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 08:35:14AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, i686-linux and s390{,x}-linux. Ok
for trunk/4.9?
I'd like to see this in 4.9.1, it is a wrong-code regression from 4.8.x,
so I'm pinging this
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 4:20 AM, Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/02/2014 06:30 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
But this is one of things that was not quite clear to me. I know that
polymorphic type A
was created at a give memory location. THis means that accesses to that
location in one
I've spotted another couple of issues (inline below) that I see when
trying to bootstrap an AArch64 compiler with this patch applied.
(sorry for any duplicate mails sent and received, my mailer was upset by
some of the characters in the error messages).
Thanks,
James
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at
On Jul 8, 2014, at 4:17 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 03:14:04PM +0400, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
On the over hand, updated in such a way intrinsic
may actually generate different instruction then intended (e.g. FMA case).
It is the same with scalars, we have
gcc/ChangeLog
PR debug/59051
* dwarf2out.h (enum dw_mod_flag): Add dw_mod_restrict.
* dwarf2out.c (dw_mod_decl_flags): Handle TYPE_RESTRICT.
(dw_mod_type_flags): Likewise.
(dw_mods_to_quals): New function.
(dw_mod_qualified_type): Likewise.
Hi,
In my original patch I introduced a new enum to keep track of the qualifiers
that we might want to output. But that seems silly in retrospect. We already
have the tree cv_qualifier enum to encode all possible cv-qualifier
combinations, so this variant of the patch just reuses those and uses
On 07/08/2014 07:28 AM, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
Thanks for catching those problems! I've committed this updated version
of the patch.
I forgot to remove the support for the collapse clause in from the loop
construct in the c frontend. I did so upstream, but not internally. I've
checked in
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hello,
I apologize for taking so long to get into this patch. I ad busy time
(wedding
and teaching), should be back in regular schedule now.
Sri, can you provide examples to show why putting thunks into the same
section as
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hello,
I apologize for taking so long to get into this patch. I ad busy time
(wedding
and teaching), should be back in regular schedule now.
Sri,
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
AIX as' .set pseudoop has somewhat unexpected behaviour. It seems to be
implemented by syntactically replacin all appereances of the alias by
its target (that can be an expressoin) but it is still possible to globalize
the
On 7/8/2014 11:36 AM, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
So can we settle for
--- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bind_c_array_params_2.f90
2014-05-24 16:17:53.0 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bind_c_array_params_2.f90 2014-07-07
19:15:47.0 +0200
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
Forgot to rebase my ChangeLog, sorry.
Here is the version with the correct one:
gcc/ChangeLog
PR debug/59051
* dwarf2out.h (modified_type_die): Handle TYPE_QUAL_RESTRICT.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
PR debug/59051
* gcc.dg/guality/restrict.c: New test.
---
I don't think we want to warn about e.g. 1-1, only about literal 0.
Original Message
From: Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
Sent: Tue, Jul 8, 2014 05:50 AM
To: Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com; Jason Merrill
ja...@redhat.com; Carlos O'Donell car...@redhat.com; Siddhesh
On 07/08/2014 08:50 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
This is an attempt to move the warning about transposed memset arguments
from the glibc headers to gcc FEs. The problem with the warning in glibc
is that it uses __builtin_constant_p and e.g. jump threading very often
makes the warning
On 07/08/2014 03:24 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
I don't think we want to warn about e.g. 1-1, only about literal 0.
What rationale would you give for not warning on 1-1?
Cheers,
Carlos.
On 01-07-14 19:26, Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/01/14 09:51, Yufeng Zhang wrote:
Hi,
This patch resolves a conflict between the aapcs64 test framework for
func-ret tests and the optimization option -fuse-caller-save, which was
enabled by default at -O1 or above recently.
Minor detail: it's enabled
The java frontend is one of the only places where build_type_variant is
still used. New code should use build_qualified_type. See gcc/tree.h.
Build and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
gcc/java/ChangeLog
* builtins.c (putVolatile_builtin): Use build_qualified_type
instead of
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 03:24:52PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
I don't think we want to warn about e.g. 1-1, only about literal 0.
Well, at least literal 0 and '\0'. In any case, it seems both the C and C++
FEs fold the arguments too early, already during the parsing of the argument
list. In
You probably can't. But check what the C frontend ends up producing with
Struct x { const struct x *p; };
Doesn't it use an incomplete copy during the definition of x?
I was poking around this last week with the type identification. C frontend
seems
always make the type complete by
PR 61746 and gofrontend issue 35 point out a bug in C-style comment
parsing in the Go frontend. The sequence /*/ was interpreted as a
complete C-style comment. This patch fixes the bug. Bootstrapped and
ran Go testsuite on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Committed to mainline and
4.9 branch.
Ian
As mentioned before, I would prefer that you change hppa*-*-hpux* to
hppa*-*-*.
Done in my tree so I won't forget. Now someone has to approve the patch!
Dominique
This patch from Chris Manghane fixes an ICE-on-invalid in the gccgo
frontend, reported as PR 61308. The fix is to convert an array start
index to int before doing a bounds check on the type. Bootstrapped and
ran Go testsuite on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Committed to mainline.
Ian
diff -r
...
diff --git gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr60226.c
gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr60226.c
...
The test fails on x86_64-apple-darwin13 with
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr60226.c -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/opt/gcc/work/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr60226.c:6:7: error:
I'd rather handle this in check_cv_quals_for_unify.
Jason
Java guys,
-- do you still need this script or can it be removed?
For now I went ahead and applied the patch below which converts
the reference to the style sheet from http to https.
Gerald
Index: bin/gen-classpath-compare
===
On 07/08/2014 12:38 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
What rationale would you give for not warning on 1-1?
Because it's not likely to be a case of argument transposition; it's
more likely to be an expression that just happens to evaluate to 0,
which is fine as a length argument to memset.
On
On 07/07/2014 11:15 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+ error (only declarations can be marked %explicit%);
That's pretty unclear, since a definition is a declaration.
Let's split this into three error messages: If the problem is that we're
outside the class, we should say that. If the problem
On 07/07/2014 07:20 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
OK?
And for 4.9?
Yes.
Jason
The problem with devirt-10 and devirt-15 is the excellent kludge for
aliases on AIX can produce multiple symbols.
ipa-prop: Discovered a virtual call to a known target (void
wxBufferedDC::InitCommon(wxDCBase*)/3 - virtual void
wxDCBase::_ZN8wxDCBase18SetLayoutDirectionEi.localalias.6(int)/36),
...and convert one from cvsweb to SVN.
Applied.
Gerald
Index: bugs/reghunt.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/bugs/reghunt.html,v
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -r1.19 reghunt.html
--- bugs/reghunt.html 29 Jun 2014
On Jul 8, 2014, at 2:07 PM, Dominique Dhumieres domi...@lps.ens.fr wrote:
As mentioned before, I would prefer that you change hppa*-*-hpux* to
hppa*-*-*.
Done in my tree so I won't forget. Now someone has to approve the patch!
Ok.
:-) I usually just expect people to check in such minor
On Jul 8, 2014, at 3:12 PM, Dominique Dhumieres domi...@lps.ens.fr wrote:
diff --git gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr60226.c
gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/pr60226.c
The test fails on x86_64-apple-darwin13 with
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr60226.c -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
OK.
Jason
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 1:24 AM, Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com wrote:
Bah... too bad we have to resort to this. Then please summarize the
discussion at the beginning of the file: what the file is *exactly* for (an
accidental contributor should be able to understand if and what should go
Hello,
As discussed in
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-07/msg00145.html, I'd like
to put the patch for texi2pod.pl here. The patch is necessary to
output the gdb man manual correctly for such cases,
G@{++}
and
@dfn{@sc{gdb/mi} interface}
contrib/ChangeLog
2014-07-09 Mingjie
Cong, can you ping this patch again? There does not seem to be
pending comments left.
David
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Cong Hou co...@google.com wrote:
Ping?
thanks,
Cong
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Cong Hou co...@google.com wrote:
Any comment on this patch?
thanks,
Cong
[I couldn't find a patch submission address for ICL, so I'm sending this
here]
With ICL enabled and an LTO boot strap the ICL build always errors
out due to -Werror=maybe-undefined. The following patch fixes
the LTO build for me by initializing the variables in question.
All warnings were
The problem with devirt-10 and devirt-15 is the excellent kludge for
aliases on AIX can produce multiple symbols.
ipa-prop: Discovered a virtual call to a known target (void
wxBufferedDC::InitCommon(wxDCBase*)/3 - virtual void
With the patch, GCC on AIX now responds that ifunc is supported.
The C and C++ attr-ifunc testcases now run and fail.
This is unexpected. I am testing version of the patch with
if (lookup_attribute (ifunc, DECL_ATTRIBUTES (n-decl)))
return false;
added to beggining of
PING!
-Original Message-
From: Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2014 2:12 AM
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: marcus.shawcr...@arm.com; richard.earns...@arm.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH, aarch64] Add prefetch support
PING!
From:
86 matches
Mail list logo
