Hi!
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:58:54 +0100, I wrote:
Hi Casar!
Can you please help me trying to understand the following change, that
you've done a long time ago:
On Tue, 8 Jul 2014 07:28:24 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
cesar_philippi...@mentor.com wrote:
On 07/07/2014 02:55 AM, Thomas
Hi Cesar!
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 21:34:49 -0800, Cesar Philippidis ce...@codesourcery.com
wrote:
debug_tree was throwing an ICE when I was debugging scan_sharing_clauses
in omp-low.c. The problem turned out to be a missing comma. I've applied
this fix to gomp-4_0-branch.
--- gcc/tree.c
2014-11-13 2:03 GMT+03:00 Joseph Myers jos...@codesourcery.com:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
It's hard to decide which of runtime functionality should be
considered as basic and how it should be used. We may say that the
only basic thing is hardware enabling which is enable_mpx
Hi!
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:11:08AM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Actually I think you want to do this for can_throw, too.
We probably do not have throwing internal calls, but it is better to be safe.
I'll leave that change to you ;), as I said in my last mail, it isn't
immediately clear to me
The following fixes PR61559 by implementing the bswap cancellation
patters required for gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-8.c in match.pd.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2014-12-13 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
PR middle-end/61559
* match.pd:
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014, Ilya Verbin wrote:
On 12 Nov 15:34, Richard Biener wrote:
Seems like Vlad introduced the conflicting type with
Okay, we're going to test our changes with patch in the bottom applied
both to kyukhin/gomp4-offload and trunk.
* gcc/lra-lives.c (struct
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014, Marek Polacek wrote:
This patch introduces TYPE_OVERFLOW_SANITIZED predicate to
consolidate a common check.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
Hmm, I'd have expected to test !TYPE_OVERFLOW_SANITIZED (),
that is, have the predicate inverted. At least
From: Joseph Myers [mailto:jos...@codesourcery.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 10:11 PM
This patch modifies the C parser to give an error if:
- any variable or function parameter is declared with a float type or
a type containing a float (prototype are ignored)
But if you
Hi Guys,
I am applying the patch below to add support for G10 versions of the
RL78 assembler multiply and divide functions to the libgcc library.
Cheers
Nick
libgcc/ChangeLog
2014-11-13 Nick Clifton ni...@redhat.com
* config/rl78/divmodhi.S: Add support for the G10
This merges simplifications of conditionals from tree-ssa-forwprop.c.
Slight complication arises from having to also implement
0 ? A : B because otherwise X ? A : A may trigger which
may trigger an overflow warning during bootstrap if A and A
are not equal but 0 and 0(OVF) but we selected the
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 12-11-14 15:17, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014, Tom de Vries wrote:
[ moved from gcc@ to gcc-patches@ ]
[ subject was: Re: [gomp4] openacc kernels directive support ]
On 30-09-14 15:37, Tom de Vries wrote:
I would be
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014, Alan Lawrence wrote:
In response to https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg01803.html, this
series removes the VEC_RSHIFT_EXPR, instead using a VEC_PERM_EXPR (with a
second argument full of constant zeroes) to represent the shift.
I've kept the use of vec_shr
Ping? I hope this patch can catch up with stage 1 of GCC-5.0. Thanks.
Hi Felix,
Sorry for the delay responding, I've been out of the office recently
and I'm only just catching up on a backlog of GCC related emails.
I'm in two minds about this; I can potentially see the need for
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 05:35:48PM -0800, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:
Here is one more merge of libsanitizer (last one was in Sept).
Tested on x86_64 Ubuntu 14.04 like this:
rm -rf */{*/,}libsanitizer make -j 50
make -j 40 -C gcc check-g{cc,++}
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 01:53:49PM +, Julian Brown wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 19:19:55 +0100
Julian Brown jul...@codesourcery.com wrote:
The patches implementing __builtin_acc_on_device are still in
processing. For the time being this patch removes the dependency on
that builtin in
Some time ago there was an attempt to add the DWARF DW_AT_APPLE_*
extensions to the file include/dwarf2.def.
The original patch email is here:
https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2012-09/msg00282.html
the patch committed mail is here:
https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2012-10/msg00424.html
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 01:54:08PM +, Julian Brown wrote:
From 1f17beb70b5607d1884fad1cb4734857f0e7846f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Julian Brown jul...@codesourcery.com
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 02:45:29 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] OpenACC documentation.
-xx-xx Thomas Schwinge
Hi all,
Following the trend in i386 and alpha, this patch uses std::swap to
perform swapping of values in the aarch64 backend instead of declaring
temporaries.
Tested and bootstrapped on aarch64-linux.
Ok for trunk?
Thanks,
Kyrill
2014-11-13 Kyrylo Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com
*
Hi all,
Following the trend in i386 and alpha, this patch uses std::swap to
perform swapping of values in the arm backend instead of declaring
temporaries.
Tested and bootstrapped on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf.
Ok for trunk?
Thanks,
Kyrill
2014-11-13 Kyrylo Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com
The following patch
[libcc1, build] Enable libcc1 on Solaris
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg00079.html
has remained unreviewed for more than a week. In the absence of libcc1
maintainer, it needs a global reviewer.
Thanks.
Rainer
--
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:35:28AM +0100, Andrew Burgess wrote:
Am I correct to think that the include/* files are owned by GCC, and
so the mistake here was not propagating the change to the GCC
repository?
Yes.
2014-11-13 Shinichiro Hamaji shinichiro.ham...@gmail.com
* dwarf2.h
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:44:56AM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
The following patch
[libcc1, build] Enable libcc1 on Solaris
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg00079.html
has remained unreviewed for more than a week. In the absence of libcc1
maintainer, it needs a
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
-* libgomp: (libgomp).GNU OpenMP runtime library
+* libgomp: (libgomp).GNU OpenACC and OpenMP runtime
library
@end direntry
See Dave Malcolm's patch, please integrate it into your patchset.
Namely,
Hi All,
I have successfully rebased this and tested in conjunction with a patch from
Alan Hayward ([AArch64] [BE] Fix vector load/stores to not use ld1/st1), who
should be submitting a new version shortly. Built and tested on:
aarch64-none-elf
aarch64_be-none-elf
x86_64-linux-gnu
Regards,
David
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 09:45:50AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
Hmm, I'd have expected to test !TYPE_OVERFLOW_SANITIZED (),
that is, have the predicate inverted. At least that's how
I understand the name - an overflow is to be preserved for
sanitization.
I guess that macro name is a little
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, Rainer Orth wrote:
The following patch
[libcc1, build] Enable libcc1 on Solaris
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg00079.html
has remained unreviewed for more than a week. In the absence of libcc1
maintainer, it needs a global reviewer.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 01:54:42PM +, Julian Brown wrote:
@@ -169,6 +192,57 @@ proc libgomp_init { args } {
# Disable color diagnostics
lappend ALWAYS_CFLAGS additional_flags=-fdiagnostics-color=never
+
+# TODO. Evil hack. DejaGnu doesn't have a mechanism for setting
+
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 01:55:18PM +, Julian Brown wrote:
Hi,
As mentioned in the previous mail in this series, testing the OpenACC
runtime support in libgomp is going to be awkward until the associated
middle-end pieces are ready. This stop-gap patch helps to allow tests
(that don't
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:11:41AM +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 09:45:50AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
Hmm, I'd have expected to test !TYPE_OVERFLOW_SANITIZED (),
that is, have the predicate inverted. At least that's how
I understand the name - an overflow is to be
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:04 PM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 13:16 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
We make assumptions in the codebase about when the GC can run, and when
it can't (e.g. within numerous passes) but these aren't captured in a way
that's
Hi,
in the spirit of PR 60324 and 61035, here's a patch that gets rid of
the remaining potentially unbounded stack allocations in libgfortran.
All uses of __builtin_alloca() and VLA's are replaced either straight
with heap allocated memory, or with a fixed size stack buffer,
potentially switching
Hi,
gcc/config/aarch64/iterators.md contains numerous duplicates - not always
obvious as they are not always sorted the same. Sometimes, one copy is used is
aarch64-simd-builtins.def and another in aarch64-simd.md; othertimes there is no
obvious pattern ;).
This patch just removes all the
On 11/12/2014 11:01 AM, Yangfei (Felix) wrote:
+(define_expand doloop_end
+ [(use (match_operand 0 )) ; loop pseudo
+ (use (match_operand 1 ))] ; label
+
+
+{
Drop the surrounding the { }.
r~
Hello,
I updated the patch with the redundant removed. Is
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 2:41 AM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 11:43 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 05:27:50PM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 14:56
Hi,
shall we do something like the below? Safety checked x86_64-linux.
Thanks,
Paolo.
///
2014-11-13 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
* constexpr.c (maybe_constant_folded_value): Add.
* cp-tree.h (maybe_constant_folded_value): Declare it.
*
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi,
this patch adds infrastructure for proper streaming and merging of
TREE_TARGET_OPTION. The catch is that TREE_TARGET_OPTION is autogenerated
structure. For x86_64 it looks as follows:
/* Structure to save/restore selected target specific
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 08:24:15AM -0800, Ian Taylor wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Dominik Vogt v...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 09:06:18AM -0800, Ian Taylor wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 4:04 AM, Dominik Vogt v...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
On Tue, Nov
On 13 November 2014 10:45, Richard Biener wrote:
Hmm.
struct assign;
struct base {
operator assign *() const { return (assign *)this; }
};
struct assign : base {
};
void foo (assign *);
void bar (base *b)
{
foo (b);
}
doesn't work, but
void bar (base b)
{
foo (b);
}
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi!
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:11:08AM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Actually I think you want to do this for can_throw, too.
We probably do not have throwing internal calls, but it is better to be safe.
I'll leave that
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 04:46:39PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
I don't mind changing the language hook to return the actual DW_LANG_*
constant directly, that seems like a nice cleanup.
But I don't think we can just replace
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 6:18 PM, H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com wrote:
Hi,
possible_placement_new checks if the structure is at least big enough to
hold the VPTR pointer. But it uses BITS_PER_WORD for pointer size,
which is incorrect for many ILP32 targets. This patch replaces it with
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
This is a preliminary to patch 2, which wants functionality equivalent to
vect_gen_perm_mask (converting a char* to an RTL const_vector) but without
the check of can_vec_perm_p.
All existing calls to
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:08:01PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
Btw, I have nothing against changing TRANSLATION_UNIT_LANGUAGE
to DW_LANG_* directly - we only use it for choosing the language
of the dwarf unit. This would of course mean to change its initialization
from
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
This makes the vectorizer use VEC_PERM_EXPRs when doing reductions via
shifts, rather than VEC_RSHIFT_EXPR.
VEC_RSHIFT_EXPR presently has an endianness-dependent meaning (paralleling
vec_shr_optab). While the overall
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
Tested (with patches 1+2):
Bootstrap + check-gcc on x64-none-linux-gnu
cross-tested check-gcc on aarch64-none-elf and aarch64_be-none-elf as these
platforms stand (i.e. without vec_shr_optab).
also cross-tested
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
This redefines vec_shr optab to be the same (in terms of gcc vectors)
regardless of target endianness. The vectorizer uses this to do reductions
via shifts, so also change the vectorizer to shift things always the same
Regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, Ok for trunk?
OK two me, with three comments:
* intrinsics/chmod.c (chmod_internal): New function, move logic
here.
(chmod_func): Call chmod_internal.
Not sure what’s the need / benefit from this, given the function is only called
once.
The architecture used as an example for the MODE_CC Condition Codes in the doc
is the SPARC, but it turns out the quoted macros are either wrong or outdated:
e.g. SELECT_CC_MODE mentions CCFPEmode and CCFPmode, but REVERSIBLE_CC_MODE
says that the only mode for FP inequality comparisons is
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 09:39:42AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
What about the:
I wonder if the nonfreeing_call_p function shouldn't be moved elsewhere
though (suggestion where), so that gimple.c doesn't need the cgraph
includes.
question though (maybe it is more on Richard)?
Tried
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/20/2013 04:49 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Jeff Law l...@redhat.com writes:
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times Replaced 8 forwprop1} } */
$ grep -c Replaced forwprop-28.c.022t.forwprop1
16
;; Function test (test,
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 1:31 PM, FX fxcoud...@gmail.com wrote:
Regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, Ok for trunk?
OK two me, with three comments:
* intrinsics/chmod.c (chmod_internal): New function, move logic
here.
(chmod_func): Call chmod_internal.
Not sure what’s the need /
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:08:01PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
Btw, I have nothing against changing TRANSLATION_UNIT_LANGUAGE
to DW_LANG_* directly - we only use it for choosing the language
of the dwarf unit. This would
Hi!
On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 16:10:05 +0100, I wrote:
--- gcc/gimplify.c
+++ gcc/gimplify.c
@@ -69,7 +69,13 @@ enum gimplify_omp_var_data
+ /* Force a specific behavior (or else, a run-time error). */
+ GOVD_MAP_FORCE = 16384,
@@ -86,7 +92,11 @@ enum omp_region_type
+ /* Default to
* Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com [2014-11-13 10:55:34 +0100]:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:35:28AM +0100, Andrew Burgess wrote:
Am I correct to think that the include/* files are owned by GCC, and
so the mistake here was not propagating the change to the GCC
repository?
Yes.
2014-11-13
Hi,
This patch converts vcls(q?) vcnt(q?) and vld1(q?)_dup intrinsics to use
builtin functions instead of the previous inline assembly syntax.
Regtested with aarch64-linux-gnu on QEMU. Also passed the glorious
testsuite of Christophe Lyon.
OK for the trunk?
Index:
Hello All,
In https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg01393.html
I posted a bad patch (to generate a plugin-version.c for gcc_version
outside of plugin-version.h) but I can't find out what is wrong?
Could any person much more familiar with autoconf that I am take a few seconds
to look at
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 03:37:08PM -0600, James Norris wrote:
2014-11-05 James Norris jnor...@codesourcery.com
Cesar Philippidis ce...@codesourcery.com
Thomas Schwinge tho...@codesourcery.com
Ilmir Usmanov i.usma...@samsung.com
...
Please check formatting.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:08:44PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:08:01PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
Btw, I have nothing against changing TRANSLATION_UNIT_LANGUAGE
to DW_LANG_* directly - we
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:19:55PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
--- include/gomp-constants.h
+++ include/gomp-constants.h
@@ -28,6 +28,9 @@
/* Enumerated variable mapping types used to communicate between GCC and
libgomp. These values are used for both OpenMP and OpenACC. */
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:21:21PM +0100, Andrew Burgess wrote:
I had a look around and couldn't find anything helpful. The best I
can offer would be the current path within the llvm source code where
these are defined. Would that be sufficient?
That is not useful. The point is not to
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 7:17 AM, Zamyatin, Igor igor.zamya...@intel.com wrote:
Hi!
Following patch (moving initialization of pic_offset_table_rtx
earlier) fixes failures for asan tests on 32 bits in PIC mode mentioned here
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63534#c48
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:08:44PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:08:01PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
Btw, I have nothing
Hi!
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 17:11:42 +0100, Julian Brown jul...@codesourcery.com
wrote:
--- /dev/null
+++ b/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.oacc-c/context-2.c
+float *h_X, [...]
+h_X = (float *) malloc (N * sizeof (float));
+d_X = (float *) acc_copyin (h_X[0], N * sizeof (float));
This fixes an error I introduced by
2014-11-09 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
* match.pd: Add patterns convering two conversions in a row
from fold-const.c.
* fold-const.c (fold_unary_loc): Remove them here.
* tree-ssa-forwprop.c (combine_conversions):
A small modification of the patch + extended comment for the
mapping used for computing the separating class. The code didn't
contained an adjustment of the stride with 1 (but the comment yes),
that was temporary removed and forget to insert it back.
The code generated now is:
ISL AST generated
Hi Jakub!
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 14:10:10 +0100, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:19:55PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
--- include/gomp-constants.h
+++ include/gomp-constants.h
@@ -28,6 +28,9 @@
/* Enumerated variable mapping types used to communicate
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, Alan Lawrence wrote:
Hmmm, I see. Yes, that would be another way. It has me wondering however
exactly where to draw the line, as to what permutations
TARGET_VECTORIZE_VEC_PERM_CONST_OK should allow / how much effort it should
go to. For example, should said hook return
On 11/12/2014 06:11 PM, Andrew Sutton wrote:
Agreed. I'll probably start looking at this on Friday morning.
Note that end of stage 1 is Saturday, as I just realized today. So the
sooner the better. :)
Ouch. Good thing my merge with trunk broke in unexpected ways this
morning -- minimally,
On 12 November 2014 14:46, Ramana Radhakrishnan
ramana.radhakrish...@arm.com wrote:
On 12/11/14 13:06, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 12 November 2014 04:50, Yangfei (Felix) felix.y...@huawei.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Michael Collison
michael.colli...@linaro.org
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 02:38:06PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hi Jakub!
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 14:10:10 +0100, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:19:55PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
--- include/gomp-constants.h
+++ include/gomp-constants.h
@@ -28,6
This implements what forward_propagate_comparison does (and fold for
a part). This leaves the first loop backwards over stmts in a BB
in forwprop doing only address forward propagation (just in case
we want to separate that from the folding transforms).
It also makes the two conflicting
On 12/11/14 23:18, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/12/14 09:23, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
I noticed that the check for modified_in_p in sched-deps is not needed
and needlessly restricts the insn pairs that we can check for macro
fusion in the backend hooks.
This patch removes the check. Currently
2014-11-13 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
Merge from trunk r217417 through r217496.
Brings back next merge piece.
Here is the new patch. Bootstrapped and tested on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Teresa
2014-11-13tejohn...@google.com
gcc:
PR tree-optimization/63841
* tree.c (initializer_zerop): A constructor with no elements
does not zero initialize.
On 13 November 2014 11:09, David Sherwood david.sherw...@arm.com wrote:
Hi All,
I have successfully rebased this and tested in conjunction with a patch from
Alan Hayward ([AArch64] [BE] Fix vector load/stores to not use ld1/st1), who
should be submitting a new version shortly. Built and
gcc/ChangeLog:
2014-11-12 Martin Liska mli...@suse.cz
* Makefile.in: New object file is added.
* cgraph.h (symbol_table::allocate_cgraph_symbol): Summary UID
is filled up.
* cgraph_summary.c: New file.
* cgraph_summary.h: New file.
* gengtype.c
Following patchset introduces cgraph_summary template class that
should replace custom implementation of cgraph related summaries.
Idea behind the patch is to provide a generic interface one can use
to register custom summary related to a cgraph_node. As you know,
symbol_table provides hooks for
gcc/ChangeLog:
2014-11-12 Martin Liska mli...@suse.cz
* cgraphunit.c (symbol_table::process_new_functions):
inline_summary_vec is replaced with inline_summary_summary.
* ipa-cp.c (ipcp_cloning_candidate_p): Usage of get_inline_summary.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2014-11-12 Martin Liska mli...@suse.cz
* auto-profile.c: Include cgraph_summary.h.
* cgraph.c: Likewise.
* cgraphbuild.c: Likewise.
* cgraphclones.c: Likewise.
* cgraphunit.c: Likewise.
* ipa-cp.c: Likewise.
* ipa-devirt.c:
On 11/13/2014 05:45 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 2:41 AM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 11:43 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 05:27:50PM -0500,
Committed.
Richard.
2014-11-13 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
* match.pd: Remove redundant pattern. Inline remaining
stuff from match-rotate.pd and match-conversions.pd.
* match-rotate.pd: Remove.
* match-conversions.pd: Likewise.
Index: gcc/match.pd
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
Here is the new patch. Bootstrapped and tested on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?
Ok for trunk and branches.
Thanks,
Richard.
Thanks,
Teresa
2014-11-13tejohn...@google.com
gcc:
PR
Hi,
I think that's because Alan Hayward's original patch had a bug in it, which he
has fixed and should be submitting to gcc patches fairly soon. So it's probably
best waiting until he gets a new patch up I think.
Regards,
David.
-Original Message-
From: Christophe Lyon
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
Here is the new patch. Bootstrapped and tested on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?
Ok for trunk and branches.
Err - please fix
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 3:10 PM, mliska mli...@suse.cz wrote:
Following patchset introduces cgraph_summary template class that
should replace custom implementation of cgraph related summaries.
Idea behind the patch is to provide a generic interface one can use
to register custom summary
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
Here is the new patch. Bootstrapped and tested on
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Andrew MacLeod amacl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/13/2014 05:45 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 2:41 AM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 11:43 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Jakub
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 06:20:16AM -0800, Teresa Johnson wrote:
Here is the new patch. Bootstrapped and tested on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Teresa
2014-11-13tejohn...@google.com
gcc:
PR tree-optimization/63841
* tree.c (initializer_zerop): A
A problem is detected with building Linux kernel on MIPS platform when
both -fuse-caller-save and -pg options are present. The reason for this
is that -fuse-caller-save relies on the analysis of RTL code, but when
profiling is active (with -pg option) the code is instrumented
by adding a call to
Konstantin,
Applying the libsanitizer-221802.patch merge to r217456 with
the proposed patch at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63534#c50, produces the
following new regressions on x86_64-apple-darwin14 for asan.exp at
-m32/-m64...
FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/global-overflow-1.c
On 11/13/2014 03:33 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 3:10 PM, mliska mli...@suse.cz wrote:
Following patchset introduces cgraph_summary template class that
should replace custom implementation of cgraph related summaries.
Idea behind the patch is to provide a generic interface
Ping.
Kyrill
On 04/11/14 10:56, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Phew,
This one slipped through the cracks. Ping?
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg01981.html
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 23/09/14 16:25, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 23/09/14 16:07, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
Some intrinsics had the
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 06:20:16AM -0800, Teresa Johnson wrote:
Here is the new patch. Bootstrapped and tested on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Teresa
2014-11-13tejohn...@google.com
gcc:
On 2014.11.13 at 15:11 +0100, mliska wrote:
Just two remarks:
+template class T
+class GTY((user)) cgraph_summary T *
+{
+public:
+ /* Default construction takes SYMTAB as an argument. */
+ cgraph_summary (symbol_table *symtab, bool ggc = false): m_ggc (ggc),
+m_insertion_enabled
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 06:20:16AM -0800, Teresa Johnson wrote:
Here is the new patch. Bootstrapped and tested on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. OK for
On 11/13/2014 03:48 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2014.11.13 at 15:11 +0100, mliska wrote:
Just two remarks:
+template class T
+class GTY((user)) cgraph_summary T *
+{
+public:
+ /* Default construction takes SYMTAB as an argument. */
+ cgraph_summary (symbol_table *symtab, bool ggc =
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 03:39:44PM -0600, James Norris wrote:
* c-typeck.c (c_finish_oacc_parallel, c_finish_oacc_kernels,
c_finish_oacc_data): New functions.
(handle_omp_array_sections, c_finish_omp_clauses):
Handle should be on the above line, no need to wrap too early.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 06:46:23AM -0800, Teresa Johnson wrote:
--- tree.c (revision 217190)
+++ tree.c (working copy)
@@ -10330,6 +10330,8 @@ initializer_zerop (const_tree init)
{
unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT idx;
+if (TREE_CLOBBER_P (init))
+
The patch also makes us allow to iterate over things in the predicate
position like
(for op (INTEGER_CST REAL_CST)
(simplify
(plus @0 op)
...
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied to the
branch.
Richard.
2014-11-13 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
*
On 11/13/2014 09:34 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Andrew MacLeod amacl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/13/2014 05:45 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 2:41 AM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 11:43 +0100, Richard Biener
1 - 100 of 258 matches
Mail list logo
