> Here is a patch implementing what I think has been discussed in this thread. > > OK?
Looks good to me. Uli, do you agree with that change for S/390 or would you rather see us fixing the float_t type definition in Glibc? -Andreas-
> Here is a patch implementing what I think has been discussed in this thread. > > OK?
Looks good to me. Uli, do you agree with that change for S/390 or would you rather see us fixing the float_t type definition in Glibc? -Andreas-